EVE General Discussion

 
3 PagesPrevious page123
 

It's against the Eve ToS

First post
Author
ChaosTheory.
#41 - 2017-05-16 17:45:30 UTC
As I suspected.
#42 - 2017-05-16 18:33:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
RainbowDashC22 Shiratori wrote:
That's kinda funny you know. Concord protecting the stations and gates, but will happily let Criminals and those with low standing use the gates and dock at stations. Wish they would fix that. Criminals should be shot on sight by Concord and barred from any stations in High and Low sec. Let them run around in Null and WH space. And Negative Standing should bar you from being able to use Concord's gates to get into the High Sec areas, not just be a little slap on the wrist.
Criminal flag and outlaw status, know the difference before posting on this subject further.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Gallente Federation
#43 - 2017-05-16 19:29:04 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:


For years, when we said that things in high sec were too good (not for high sec residents, but for null sec alts), we were told by many a high sec poster "LEAVE HIGH SEC ALONE, JUST BUFF NULL". CCP (directly and indirectly) did this, and now here you are complaining about null sec's affect on high sec.


The ore issue is transient anyway, ie its difficult for a balancing pass on rorquals because (a) the buff was done against a rise in mineral consumption for citadels and ecs, and (b) ultimately mining capacity will have to be divided between mining moons. asteroids and ice, where it is only currently divided amongst the latter 2, towers automatically do the first task at the moment.

You'd also hope that the sane highsec miner has to recognize that there will be opportunity to day trip lowsec and null, quite possibly with organized protection, ie there is a massive buff coming for all miners ahead.
Amarr Empire
#44 - 2017-05-16 21:08:21 UTC  |  Edited by: virm pasuul
As the OP I'd just like to state that I wholeheartedly support what Code stands for and how they go about putting it into practice. Their results speak for themselves. That they generate so many unceasing tears is a testamnet to their effectiveness. Long may they continue.

This thread wasn't about Code. Code play within the rules and accept the consequeces of their actions like adults not children. Drunken adults maybe :)
I was just highlighting what seems to be a discrepancy in how the rules are enforced.

I wouldn't mind the trade hub scamming so much if it was not such a mire of unoriginal copy and paste.
It's not that's it's scamming or spam, it's that it's boring spam I object to.
Amarr Empire
#45 - 2017-05-16 21:12:58 UTC
Vokan Narkar wrote:
virm pasuul wrote:
It's against the Eve ToS to biomass ganking alts to avoid the negative consequence of security status.
Fair enough.

Why is it OK to biomass trade hub spammer bots to avoid the negative consequence of being blocked by everyone?
Seems to be inconsistent with point one.

wait really? link to any official post which states this?


First part or second part?
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2017-05-16 21:17:46 UTC
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:
[img]https://media3.giphy.com/media/zfuOq2rFBE7Kg/giphy.gif[/img]


I would just like to compliment ISD Dorrin Barstorlode on the lightness of his moderate touch :)
I assume I am allowed to say that?
Warped Intentions
#47 - 2017-05-16 21:27:03 UTC
virm pasuul wrote:
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:
[img]https://media3.giphy.com/media/zfuOq2rFBE7Kg/giphy.gif[/img]


I would just like to compliment ISD Dorrin Barstorlode on the lightness of his moderate touch :)
I assume I am allowed to say that?


Nope, can't do it. Discussing forum moderation is a violation of the forum TOS.

Topic Locked!!

LOL Sorry, just kidding. Honest!! Couldn't help myself.Big smile

"The world ain't fair, there is no Santa Claus, and not everyone gets a F'n trophy just for showing up. Welcome to the real world. Welcome to Eve."

Brave Collective
#48 - 2017-05-17 00:22:48 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

And to answer your question, yes they did ask for this. Just a few examples of what I had to read over and over again since 2011:
You didn't have to read anything.

You like reading it. It gives you something to rant about and validates your own bizarre worldview.

Mr Epeen Cool


You mean more bizarre than yours? Impossible!
#49 - 2017-05-17 00:42:44 UTC
virm pasuul wrote:

I wouldn't mind the trade hub scamming so much if it was not such a mire of unoriginal copy and paste.
It's not that's it's scamming or spam, it's that it's boring spam I object to.


I'm still left wondering what is so magical about the range of numbers from 9.1 to 9.8 billion that the hangar clearances are priced at.
Sometimes it is fun to jest in local about the silly scams.
3 PagesPrevious page123
Forum Jump