EVE General Discussion

 
^ Back to top

Topic is locked indefinitely.

4 Pages123Next pageLast page
 

Implications of forum "likes" and perceptions of those with lots of them

Author
#1 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:16  |  Edited by: Petrus Blackshell
One of the things that has baffled me to no end about these new forums is the "like" system. I'm not sure what purpose it serves. I have been more of a forum warrior/troll lately than I have in the past, and that has apparently garnered me a bunch of these "likes". They were at times used as tacit "I agree with you", or as "your post is funny", or simply "I am an ******* who uses a script to like a whole page of posters". Upon reaching "big round numbers" of "likes" (10, 50, 100, and now almost 500) I get weird vague feelings of accomplishment or affirmation... but I also feel bad for having them. In short, I am confused.

The confusion is only compounded by the fact that the thread listing shows a thread's "likes" as a total of all "likes" on all posts, even if they are all "liking" the second comment about how terrible the OP and the whole thread is.

What does "liking" a post mean to you? When do you "like" as opposed to posting a "+1" post, or similar? What, if anything, do you think upon seeing a person with a lot of "likes"? Do you even care?

Edit: added more airquotes around the word "like" everywhere.
Rifterlings - newbie-friendly swashbuckling corp ("weflyrifters" in-game channel). Join today! www.rifterlings.com

Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com
That Escalated Quickly.
#2 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:20
Evebook.

Simple as that.
"Sings me a dances of wolfs, who smells fear and slays the coward. Sings me a dances of mans, who smells gold and slays his brother."
#3 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:21
I just liked your post, what does that mean to you? anything ?

YOU MUST THINK FIRST....

"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion

The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar
#4 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:24
I like this system for the prevention of arsehat posts. Also, it can be funny to read how someone hands somebody else's arse to them in a much liked comment no. 2
With great power comes great electricity bill.
#5 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:25
Professor Alphane wrote:
I just liked your post, what does that mean to you? anything ?

I was asking you!

I am seriously not trolling, but trying to ask people what it means to them. From the start I have viewed it as a pointless endeavor to "Web2.0" the forums, but what with the CSM election requiring "likes" for their candidacy post, I am thinking that either I have it wrong (or am in the minority), or CCP has a disconnect going on between them and their players on what "likes" are.
Rifterlings - newbie-friendly swashbuckling corp ("weflyrifters" in-game channel). Join today! www.rifterlings.com

Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com
#6 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:25
Encouragement to post more nonsense!
Dust 514's CPM 0 Iron Wolf Saber
Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues. 
#7 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:25
As far as my opinion of likes go I'd refer you to the third paragrapgh of This post I made during the Destination Skillqueue incident.

YOU MUST THINK FIRST....

"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion

The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar
#8 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:27
Professor Alphane wrote:
As far as my opinion of likes go I'd refer you to the third paragrapgh of This post I made during the Destination Skillqueue incident.

I "liked" it. Edit: forgot the airquotes.

Aerethir El-Kharisti wrote:
I like this system for the prevention of arsehat posts. Also, it can be funny to read how someone hands somebody else's arse to them in a much liked comment no. 2


I see no way in which this prevents arsehat posts.
Rifterlings - newbie-friendly swashbuckling corp ("weflyrifters" in-game channel). Join today! www.rifterlings.com

Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com
#9 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:35
It's a barrier to the democratic process which needs to be stomped into the ground.

Give CSM candidates your likes people, it costs you only a click!
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.

Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
#10 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:40
Alavaria Fera wrote:
It's a barrier to the democratic process which needs to be stomped into the ground.

Give CSM candidates your likes people, it costs you only a click!


I dont like any of them and I think they're more dillusional about illusions of grandure than I am. Either way isnt the candidacy process over?
Dust 514's CPM 0 Iron Wolf Saber
Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues. 
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#11 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:41
About 300-500 likes is in my opinion the best score someone could have and makes me think of an actual good poster.
People with more likes are usually either trolls or attention whores or both.
I'm just going to walk the Earth. You know, like Caine in Kung Fu: walk from place to place, meet people, get into adventures and die of autoerotic asphyxation in a sleazy Thai hotel room.
#12 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:42
Zimmy Zeta wrote:
About 300-500 likes is in my opinion the best score someone could have and makes me think of an actual good poster.
People with more likes are usually either trolls or attention whores or both.

Quote:
Likes received: 841


So, should I not believe you, not pay attention to you, or both?
Rifterlings - newbie-friendly swashbuckling corp ("weflyrifters" in-game channel). Join today! www.rifterlings.com

Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#13 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:45
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
Zimmy Zeta wrote:
About 300-500 likes is in my opinion the best score someone could have and makes me think of an actual good poster.
People with more likes are usually either trolls or attention whores or both.

Quote:
Likes received: 841


So, should I not believe you, not pay attention to you, or both?


Oh...that was quick....I knew that someone would react....and I must say, I really appreciate the attention you gave me...thank you very much Big smile
I'm just going to walk the Earth. You know, like Caine in Kung Fu: walk from place to place, meet people, get into adventures and die of autoerotic asphyxation in a sleazy Thai hotel room.
Fatal Ascension
#14 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:46
more likes = bigger epeen?


my epeen is small atm :/ but rub on it somemore and it might get bigger Lol
http://www.soundboard.com/sb/Very%20best%20of%20Makalu%20Zarya

The best advice I can give any Eve player, new or old, is to never ever ever read the general discussion subforum. It is a cancer on this game and should just be deleted.
#15 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:51
Zimmy Zeta wrote:
About 300-500 likes is in my opinion the best score someone could have and makes me think of an actual good poster.
People with more likes are usually either trolls or attention whores or both.



Intersting idea but surely the fact everyone has been posting on the forums for diffrent lengths of time rather distorts that metric.

Also further to the topic, it's also a silent form of communiication on the forums and a way to build relationships.

2 examples come to mind

Say you are in a hotly debated thread, there may be a couple of people following the thread and while not commenting publicly are supporting your posting by liking what you say.

I spend a bit of time in Science and Industry now there a couple of posters down there, that despite never having spoke to directly there use of the 'likes' feature leads me to believe there is a mutual respect there without anything actually having to be said.

I'm sure there are downsides to the system but I think it works quite well.

YOU MUST THINK FIRST....

"I sit with the broken angels clutching at straws and nursing our scars.." - Marillion

The wise man watches the rise and fall of fools from afar
Triumvirate.
#16 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:54
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
One of the things that has baffled me to no end about these new forums is the "like" system. I'm not sure what purpose it serves. I have been more of a forum warrior/troll lately than I have in the past, and that has apparently garnered me a bunch of these "likes". They were at times used as tacit "I agree with you", or as "your post is funny", or simply "I am an ******* who uses a script to like a whole page of posters". Upon reaching "big round numbers" of "likes" (10, 50, 100, and now almost 500) I get weird vague feelings of accomplishment or affirmation... but I also feel bad for having them. In short, I am confused.

The confusion is only compounded by the fact that the thread listing shows a thread's "likes" as a total of all "likes" on all posts, even if they are all "liking" the second comment about how terrible the OP and the whole thread is.

What does "liking" a post mean to you? When do you "like" as opposed to posting a "+1" post, or similar? What, if anything, do you think upon seeing a person with a lot of "likes"? Do you even care?

Edit: added more airquotes around the word "like" everywhere.

This is pretty much the reason why I disabled the entire "total likes" counter from classic forum style by default.
Likes to single post can be used to indicate many things, but total count has no real use.
Get
Play with the best - Die like the rest
Gallente Federation
#17 Posted: 2012.02.17 17:59
I like a post becasue

1. I agree with what you said
2. I thought what you said was funny
3. What was said was very wity

Thats pretty much it
"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#18 Posted: 2012.02.17 18:00  |  Edited by: Zimmy Zeta
Grey Stormshadow wrote:

This is pretty much the reason why I disabled the entire "total likes" counter from classic forum style by default.
Likes to single post can be used to indicate many things, but total count has no real use.


100% Supported. The argument should matter, not the poster.

edit: @ Prof Alphane: So you have disvovered the beauty of social engineering...that's how I got about 90% of my likes Big smile
I'm just going to walk the Earth. You know, like Caine in Kung Fu: walk from place to place, meet people, get into adventures and die of autoerotic asphyxation in a sleazy Thai hotel room.
#19 Posted: 2012.02.17 18:00
Grey Stormshadow wrote:
This is pretty much the reason why I disabled the entire "total likes" counter from classic forum style by default.
Likes to single post can be used to indicate many things, but total count has no real use.


That's a pretty cool idea. However, total "likes" can also indicate forum alts, or new characters -- and I have found myself responding differently to those posters as opposed to "forum vets" with a few hundred likes.
Rifterlings - newbie-friendly swashbuckling corp ("weflyrifters" in-game channel). Join today! www.rifterlings.com

Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com
#20 Posted: 2012.02.17 18:03
Grey Stormshadow wrote:

This is pretty much the reason why I disabled the entire "total likes" counter from classic forum style by default.
Likes to single post can be used to indicate many things, but total count has no real use.



Hmm, seems like something someone who doesn't have a lot of likes would say.

----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.
4 Pages123Next pageLast page
Forum Jump