EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2011-12-16 09:37
  • First Forum Visit: 2011-12-29 22:44
  • Number of Posts: 13,458
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 0

Alavaria Fera

Security Status 3.3
  • GoonWaffe Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • Sick of being a FC's Drone in EVE Communication Center

    That's the fun, remember in b-r where you pressed F1 (your doomsday) and returned after 1 hour?

    We had the doomsday primary just posted in jabber at some point I think.

  • World War Bee in EVE Communication Center

    I'm sure if you google for memes like "bend the knee" you'll find it.


    Geronimo McVain wrote:
    But some people don't play it for fun any longer but to boost their ego.

    Hey, don't be too rude to your elitePVP saviors, you're not the ones bringing the nondocking ships to remove the "literal cancer killing eve".

  • World War Bee in EVE Communication Center

    Dreiden Kisada wrote:
    So, basically, the only way to have fun in this game is the way you find fun? Everyone else is wrong?

    Or is it more that anything we find fun and entertaining is wrong?

    No, it's just we're wrong, that's all.

    Dreiden Kisada wrote:
    Because I'll tell you what, i'm having a good time kiting people to death with Asher,

    Asher, the 23rd best FC in the Imperium and the hero we need.

    Dreiden Kisada wrote:
    laugh at all the moral posts and VFK memes?

    Well we are immortal, horny white boy lifestyle that involves wallowing in pleasure, and all.

    I think VFK station is now freeported, so if you hurry you can get there in an interceptor and dock.

  • World War Bee in EVE Communication Center

    Hahaha, you'd like that huh.

  • Wow... nullsec is.. underwhelming. in EVE Communication Center

    Lee Maulerant wrote:
    PvP 5 years ago was more intense than it has been in the past year, and it make me a little sad.

    Don't worry now we are fighting a series of amazing interceptor-based (and t3 destroyer-based) fights

  • Wow... nullsec is.. underwhelming. in EVE Communication Center

    Good thing you didn't get dropped on.

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: Skills, Modules and Refitting in EVE Information Center

    Monasucks wrote:
    Alavaria Fera wrote:
    Memphis Baas wrote:
    CCP seems to be imagining carrier vs. carrier combat (well, squadron vs. squadron), but really the best way to take out squadrons seems to be with destroyers or cruisers, esp. with that 10% penalty.

    T3destroyer and T3cruiser online is the way to go.


    yeah just leave it as it is.. and remove spider tank and introduce those fax.. and all will better.. even better if you give us back jumprange and remove the space AIDS

    As long as humans have this uncontrollable desire to use teleporting mechanics there will be no way to totally defeat the timer menace.

  • Skill injectors: now age is no longer intel in EVE Communication Center

    Terminal Insanity wrote:
    now we have 3 day old titan pilots, and endgame sov is fought in interceptors.

    You should really just inject for Interceptors and small guns (or rocket/light missile). Confirmed.

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! in EVE Information Center

    Yes, the same response to that as before, as well.

  • Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security in EVE Information Center

    Buzz Orti wrote:
    Mishra San wrote:
    Cynthia Asanari wrote:
    I've recently been drawing eve ship commissions for PLEX . is this legit? I'm pretty sure it is, but I'm just double checking anyway.
    Something like this.
    http://imgur.com/gallery/EBcTNPa

    I figured i had to ask since it's not really an in-game item


    Late to the party and kinda off topic, but that is an amazing picture =).

    Likes!

    Is this like a 3rd party accounting system to keep track of brokers commissions on trades of services or products security?

    Ah yes, a value added tax on all transactions which have out-of-game components.

  • Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion in EVE Information Center

    Jinrai Tremaine wrote:
    Presumably that would come with some significant limitations beyond simply needing to be near the planet - possibly they'd have to be on-grid with the warpin, for example, plus maybe they'd require the citadel to allow public access - I can't imagine it'd be CCP's intent to completely lock out anyone but the citadel owners from doing PI on a planet for hisec at the very least, hopefully not for the rest of EVE either.

    Mmm, killing super citadels in highsec

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: Skills, Modules and Refitting in EVE Information Center

    Memphis Baas wrote:
    CCP seems to be imagining carrier vs. carrier combat (well, squadron vs. squadron), but really the best way to take out squadrons seems to be with destroyers or cruisers, esp. with that 10% penalty.

    T3destroyer and T3cruiser online is the way to go.

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! in EVE Information Center

    Arekanderia Hara wrote:
    If I have to multibox in battleships in order to get the isk required to pay for a capital

    I'm sure you can use a single battleship to get the isk to pay for a capital, it'll just take a bit longer.

    If you must use multiple accounts at once though, make sure you aren't getting some sort of unfair advantage.

    Arekanderia Hara wrote:
    Oh good, so another reason to not bother using my caps ever again. Can't get enough isk to replace it, so might as well not use it. That's a brilliant plan to have us risk our capitals more often; just force only those that aren't in a blob alliance to be unable to buy carriers, thus making it only the blob alliances holding tons of moons able to field capitals.

    Yeah I wouldn't want you to keep your capital docked or anything. I did hear that losing them doesn't count if you insured though. Or so say some of the best players in eve (after losing caps)


    Arekanderia Hara wrote:
    it's time to relieve my subscription.

    Ah, an unsubber. Again.

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! in EVE Information Center

    Cptn Manu wrote:
    Arekanderia Hara wrote:
    >

    Can you expand on how carriers are supposed to rat if the heavy fighters can't hit the rats and the light fighters can't do enough damage?.........


    This is honestly my biggest question.

    Maybe they don't...

  • Dev blog: The second CSM X summit - meeting minutes included in EVE Information Center

    Shalmon Aliatus wrote:
    Quote:
    "Endie added that the thing that drives people away the most is when they have a
    huge goal and they aim for it and they achieve, but it horrendous cost."

    I guess there is also the people that just can't have huge goals anymore, because they already did everything.
    EVE is an old game with old players that have done everything and at the moment there is no endgame content except "more of it"

    Multiboxing your 2nd, 3rd and 4th titan *huge goals each, very rare expensive and powerful* just got a little harder too, huh.

  • Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security in EVE Information Center

    Mnemosyne Ab aeterno wrote:
    So dev dudes,

    You say in a mail. Using Pirates little helper is ok. But in the ban able offence is any program or application that gives an unfair advantage to another player.

    So are you going to let other players know about every other mod that is out there?

    How are new players going to know the right tools or the wrong tools to use?

    For me knowing a player and who he /she is before they have chance to de-cloak is unfair... so is this now double standards?

    Maybe after you own someone (or warp off just before they light their cyno) you should put a link to PLH in local just to be sure they can also take advantage of it.

  • This Week in EVE #110 - Week 7+8/2016 in EVE Information Center

    Taylor MacNinch wrote:
    "Team Security brings clarification on our rules and policies regarding overlays and other third party applications in this latest dev blog" in other words, ccp explane there rules and policies in the most vague way possible.

    Seems they are quite satisfied with it though huh

  • Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security in EVE Information Center

    Som Boty wrote:
    Tiberian Deci wrote:

    If you can only have fun in this MMO by playing with yourself 16 times over its probably better that you unsub your extra accounts bro

    or, maybe you should try playing my way before you give advice? I don't clown the way you play.

    Maybe you should try clowning the way they play

  • Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security in EVE Information Center

    Alundil wrote:
    So about those updates....or that clarity.....

    Should've just named this thread like the other one in general.

    "Update regarding Overlays"

    Kinete Jenius wrote:
    Here I am running 12 on two machines with three total monitors.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZ4LByLY5T4

    My current setup has 10 of the clients tiled on one machine.

    OTA ticks are now around 6 minutes (5:50-6:10)
    NMC ticks are now around 7 minutes
    NCO ticks are also around 7 minutes

    I cannot see the algos link but I think I know who you're talking about and he just uses drone assist with a primary DDD. It's almost trivial to do.


    I could get fancy and use the OS features that focus on hover and other things to prevent even having to click through the clients. Windows 10 itself has some nifty features for doing such things. I don't have to arrange the cap bar to be visible as watchlist does that well enough for my activities.

    Mmm drone assist. Definitely the way to go when coordinating DPS of several ships.

  • Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security in EVE Information Center

    Spcius Patrouette wrote:
    Neuntausend wrote:
    Spcius Patrouette wrote:
    15 pages. still no response from CCP. cool.


    Have you ever dealt with CCPs support?

    This is Eve, dude. Have patience! They will respond eventually. Maybe. In a few weeks, or so.

    Oh no doubt, its just that they specifically said they would be responding is all.

    I think most of these posts says they will respond, and then you see 300+ pages with nothing.

    Not news.

    Proxay wrote:
    Why are we all sitting here trying to reinterpret the bible when the author can just write a quick post going "Yes", "No", "Whatever, quit". Seriously CCP, where the hell are your community liaisons.

    Because they're not going to. What're people here going to do about it?

    Post a lot, probably.

Forum Signature

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?