EVE Forums

Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2011-06-25 06:38
  • First Forum Visit: 2012-04-05 06:48
  • Number of Posts: 3,521
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 0

Anthar Thebess

Security Status 5.0

Last 20 Posts

  • Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! in EVE Information Center

    Takatii wrote:
    Do I smell the gateway to micro-transactions brewing? Why else would you want Plex in such small units?


    This change makes me so sad.

  • We Welcome Our New Microtransaction Overlords in EVE Communication Center

    Instant ship repair
    instant teleportation between systems
    apply 100 plex to reduce production time by 25%
    and other similar stuff.

  • Can we get rid of CSM after the recent PLEX insider trading fiasco? in EVE Communication Center

    CCP ban all involved people.
    Breach of NDA

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Projectors in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Signature change?
    It was ever an issue?

    People kill fighters easily using subcapitals.
    Superiority fighters chew other fast.
    Rats can easily alpha a T2 fighter on a max skilled thanathos.
    I lost wings while they where MWD back to the carrier but they got webs and died.

    There was an bug that made rats not aggro fighters?
    Constant management on fighters recalls to fix and replace lost fighters.

    Next thing support fighters - only sirens are good, there is no point in using any other.

    Shield Slaves and shield super balance - when? I know that there are plenty of other things but those are not small toys, people invested a lot of time and $
    Shield supers are very broken due to neuts - maybe introduce a passive adaptive lowslot thingy and balance this later instead of making people to wait 2 more years.

    I know that EVE is a game about patience - but do we really need to skill it so hard?

    Super fleet hangars - nice, but can support fighters have size reduced?.

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Scrams not affect afterburners ( propulsion module options ).

    Maybe what really needs to be taken into the consideration is why people prefer MWD? Why AB is less desired.
    Maybe real fix is in increasing cap usage of the MWD so you cannot perma run it without any cap related fit modifications.

    HIC offered good possibility to fight kite meta - why are you taking this away?
    HIC scram range was very important for the fighting the MJD and MJFG meta - now like every thing is jumping.

    I like current HIC for the ability to say - if you want to fight - fight not run.

    This will be bad change.

  • Nullification and Interdiction in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Ok then.

    Anchorable bubbles are ok.
    I hate them, but this is one way people protect their space, or do other crazy stuff.
    Only thing that need to change is KM generation, if we get KM from the anchorable bubbles we will get people who kill them.

    Interdiction nullification.
    Interceptors are just bad, they killed a lot of creative gameplay not introducing any thing positive. To cheap ship for this bonus, and sov mechanic.
    Nullified T3 yes, they are expensive and could be unique ships.
    Yachts, they are special edition ships and only because of this - yes.
    Blockade runners - no, they fly in cloack and hide cargo.
    Shuttles - no.

  • Nullification and Interdiction in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Why this discussion start now, before CSM campaign, and not like few months earlier?
    What happened in last week, that so many CSM people started to ask questions about obvious things that annoy players?

  • Questions for CSM 11 Live stream (Jan 29) in Council of Stellar Management

    Sovereignty :
    Citadels - longer anchor time in sovereignty is good, but if someone drop it outside alliance activity TZ in alliance capitol, it will exit anchoring in very bad TZ.
    Making anchoring time to exit during sov owning alliance TZ vulnerability could be good move.

    Rorqual, will it be fixed?
    I don't want jump hictor that cannot be killed for 7 minutes in the game.

    Structures :
    Cloning service - it is crucial.
    Fuel usage look good, but eventually someone will forget to fuel this damn thing. Can we get cloning to not use fuel blocks, but instead of it, onlining the structure could eat 50.000 blocks.

    Shutting down a service
    - can we get big warning, you can disable service by miss click.

    NPC Null space:
    Can we get some boost to living in this space. Nothing was changed since 2008.

  • (Former?) bittervets of EVE, how did you reignite your passion? in EVE Communication Center

    Gank some miners.

  • WTS eve (really?) in EVE Communication Center

    Remiel Pollard wrote:
    Sorry, but if any company other than CCP becomes this game's 'owner', they can count me 100% out. Especially if it's Chris Roberts.

    Like you have something to say about who will own EVE

    Eve is a product and it will never be any thing else.

  • The goals you can set for yourself in EvE in EVE Communication Center

    I currently want to lose a carrier on some stupid hot drop.
    Only because i never lost a carrier before.
    For last 2 weeks, gate traveling, burning thru 100km of gate bubbles - no luck yet.

  • Festive Holiday Box in EVE Technology and Research Center

    You mean like blockade runners that you unlock with the tornados?

  • Buy orders for blueprint copies in EVE Technology and Research Center

    I can sell you over 3000 capital / bc BPC's.
    Various ME/TE and runs.
    Imagine yourself list on the market that include all of those.

  • Collision damage in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Please do, i will put hell tanked battleship on autopilot route to jita, and loot all what will fall off from all this evil people who will try to ram me.

  • [December] Excavator Mining Drone yield rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    God hate miners.
    Kids hate miners.
    CODE hate miners.
    CCP (finally) hate miners.


    Please work on this 7min invul super point thingy - it is broken as hell.
    Instead of increasing drop rates of this drone materials - increase spawn rate of signatures that them drop all around eve.
    It is always better when more things are moving.

  • Looking for a Definitive answer on Docking in for Eng Complex in EVE Technology and Research Center

    CCP Masterplan wrote:
    TrippyHippy wrote:
    Dev Blogs say one thing, Sisi descriptions say another, what actually works is a 3d thing.

    Looking for a Dev answer here.

    Raitaru - no capitals, freighter/JR ok, Rorq ??

    Azbel - blog says no caps, sis description says allows caps, regardless of combat capitals, rorquals ???

    This is what we've got in the current design doc regarding docking abilities. If anything behaves differently from on Singularity, that should be considered a defect. (We've already got an open defect on the Azbel description not matching this list)

    Medium (Raitaru)
    * Small ships
    * Large ships (Battleship, Freighter, Industrial, Orca)

    Large (Azbel)
    * Small ships
    * Large ships
    * One-way undock only: Capital ships (Including Rorqual)

    XLarge (Sotiyo)
    * Small ships
    * Large ships
    * Capital ships (Including Rorqual)
    * One-way undock only: Supercapital ships

    The one-way undocks are to support ships that can end up in the structure (typically because they were built there) and so can be launched but cannot re-dock once in space.

    I am not a miner, but excluding ability to dock on L version rorqual is bad.
    People in nullsec don't use orcas, and will not use orcas.
    If they mine minerals and store them on rorqual how they cannot dock this rorqual to L version of industrial complex to use them for production?

    Maybe from balance perspective this don't look good for you - but forcing people to have alt that will move minerals from a rorqual to citadel in indy ship is much worst - it is simply annoying.

  • Balancing the Faction Ship BPC drop rates in Council of Stellar Management

    Never forget!

  • [November] Rorqual Changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    With the influx of all this ore, capitals will be so cheap.
    I like it!

  • The ahole, the troll and the scammer – an Eve phenomenon? in EVE Communication Center

    Posted by Big Lynx.

  • Shield Capital Modules - Changes required in design. in EVE Technology and Research Center

    With the recent changes to capital ships and modules, all shield capitals are heavily underpowered against armor versions.
    Some can say that shield capitals have more EHP and can rep at beginning of the cycle thus getting huge advance against armor versions.
    This is correct, until you get into serious combat situation - at this point shield is in very bad position - simply because you are out of cap, and i without cap you lose all your EHP.

    Above this with the new patch we got new capital modules that shifted capital meta, and introduced multiple basic modules that are required at modern eve battlefield.
    Most of this modules can be only mounted into the med slots of the ship - making shield capital situation even worse.
    What i am proposing (please remember that changes will apply only to capital sized modules) :
    1. Moving the Capital Size cap booster from medium slot to high slot.
    This will change meta of the battlefield and will have same effect on all capital ships
    2. Introduce Passive Shield Resistance amplifier that will provide resist for 2 selected resistances.
    To make it balanced Cap Recharge will be affected, and it will have huge power grid usage.
    3. Introduce lowslot module that will provide resistance against neuts - if point 2 is impossible to achieve.
    Again to keep it balanced it will have big power grid requirements.

    What about Slave Implants?
    There are 2 answers
    - shield will be nerfed to compensate it, and you will need to use Shield Slaves and nothing else.
    - even if ccp will not nerf shield, you simply need to cap out shield capital to remove all his EHP

Forum Signature