EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2011-06-14 10:00
  • First Forum Visit: 2012-05-02 12:02
  • Number of Posts: 27
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 16

Artimis kraw

Security Status -7.4
  • Caldari Provisions Member since
  • Caldari State Faction

Last 20 Posts

  • EVE_NT London - Saturday, November 5th 2016 in EVE Gameplay Center

    x'ing up!

  • #EVE_NT - EVE MEET IN NOTTINGHAM UK - SEPTEMBER 13 in EVE Gameplay Center

    Yeah, so MoldenHeath will represent it seems.

    I'm there.

  • Veto Corp Presents - EVE London - Saturday, July 5th 2014 in EVE Gameplay Center

    I'm there. Will try and get peeps in too.

  • Sugar Kyle for CSM9 in Council of Stellar Management

    I support Sug all the way. Being around Sugar for the last year of EVE and seeing what she is capable of, CSM would prosper greatly with her company.

    o/

  • Veto Corp Presents - EVE London - Saturday, February 1st 2014 in EVE Gameplay Center

    I will be there for sure.

  • [Odyssey 1.1] Dominix bonus change in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Altaen wrote:
    I don't think this is a needed change. It's not soul crushing, and I'm not going to rage about it, but clearly you are targeting how powerful sentry drones are with their massive tracking and range.

    Thing is, I strongly believe this massive power is well-balanced by the fact that sentry drones are stationary.

    If you need to move about the battlefield to tackle things, mitigate damage, provide RR, leave grid and return, etc, you are making the decision to leave the vast majority of your DPS behind if the battle suddenly moves to another grid, or forcing yourself/your fleet to have to slowboat to your sentries and pick them up before you can participate at the battle's new location.

    Considering this weakness of a Dominix-based fleet comp, it's okay that their damage projection and tracking are a little OP.

    I would understand reducing the range and tracking if there are plans to make sentry drones move at even half the speed of heavies, but assuming they will remain stationary, at least in regards to their use on battleships (carriers are a different story entirely) I think it's perfectly okay for them to be extremely powerful on a single battleship platform.

    And in regards to the AT... the very fact that the entire engagement is forced to take place on a single grid is why the Dominix was a bit overpowered. This isn't how fights on TQ work, so I disagree with the nerf. Just make it more expensive on points for future tournaments, nbd.


    ^ man speaks the truth.

  • CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase in EVE Information Center

    Artimis Kraw, 53, 12, 02, 15, 36, 16, 08, 05, 14, 19, 27, 45

  • Calamitous-Intent [7-2] Is Recruiting in EVE Corporations, Alliances and Organizations Center

    We now have an ex US President who can moonwalk among us.

    Need I say more?

    ~

  • Veto Corp Presents - EVE London - Saturday, September 28th 2013 in EVE Gameplay Center

    Have all my X's

  • 27th April: LONDON Fanfest Absentee Meet-up! in EVE Gameplay Center

    I am now coming to this after finding out about it last night. Will get there this later this afternoon.

  • HELM liars and now threats lol! in EVE Gameplay Center

    Tauren Tom wrote:


    ... enjoy the rest of 7-2 (with the exception of silent fart who...



    That is taking it way too far man!!!

    You just don't know when to stop do you...bully.

    Edited for editorial reasons.

  • KwarK for CSM in Council of Stellar Management

    KwarK uK wrote:
    Hmm... Special ship needed for hunting them? Maybe made out of wood with harpoon based weapon system that keeps them from flying away into space and smashing stuff.


    O Captain! My Captain!

  • Inactive account in EVE Communication Center

    DeMichael Crimson wrote:
    Ryuichi wrote:
    CraftyCroc wrote:
    Hi

    If i let an account go inactive whilst I have no permanent/reliable internet supply - (the storms have really hit us hard down here in the south + the fires ....) - do I lose anything? sp? stuff? *loot* ... ships?
    Talk time frames if you please e.g. 6 months no penalty ... 5 years your char is biomassed and account is FUBAR'd?

    Also ... on another note... (slightly related to eve)... at what stage does it become acceptable to go caveman in RL?

    Regards

    CC


    The only way to ensure retention of possessions is to trade them all to an active player. For a small fee I'd be happy to undertake this onerous task for you. Simply trade me all your ISK and stuff along with a small retainer, and I shall make sure they are all safe from deletion.

    HOPE THIS HELPS MEIGHT


    lol, it would definitely help if you were a trusted secure 3rd party service with a ton of referrals.


    DMC


    My referral counts for many...

    Ryuichi is safer than Chribba.

    Give him all your stuff to look after. It will be safe, mate.

  • Inactive account in EVE Communication Center

    What hte hell Crafty?

    I thought you died celebrating New Years!

  • Veto Corp Presents - EVE London - Saturday, February 9th 2013 in EVE Gameplay Center

    Vincent R'lyeh wrote:
    I will be in attendance again as a REAL representative of R1FTA as Artimis has sloped off to be a Bounty Hunter with a positive sec-status Shocked


    Hey, I wanted to see what the middle section of the EVE Universe looked like....pretty boring tbh.

  • Dont change the 2/10 plexes! in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Kane Rizzel wrote:
    CCP Fozzie wrote:
    Our metrics made clear that they were not living up to their primary purpose as interesting pve content


    "Hey guys, instead of making our lowsec/anysec PvE content more interesting as it seems people would rather fight at these sites than run them, how about we just remove them? That way we don't have to do any work..."

    Is what this sounds like.

    Like someone already mentioned, to eliminate all farming and some of the biggest culprits, remove mining and missions... And moon minerals... Or, create PvE content that's not easily farmed by using suggestions from players, some quite good ones in this here thread.

    Now I understand y'all have a tough job and everything, and we are a bunch of whiny players, but really, it didn't even get mentioned other than in the patch notes, so how come it was such a big issue if y'all didn't even care enough to mention it, even in passing?

    Meh.





    ^this

  • Dont change the 2/10 plexes! in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Laktos wrote:
    Vincent R'lyeh wrote:
    Robinton Jax wrote:


    So who in MH is running in next CSM?


    Dirty Protagonist for CSM!



    No, Crafty Croc.


    Has my vote.

    Safe

  • Veto Corp Presents - EVE London - Saturday, February 9th 2013 in EVE Gameplay Center

    I will be there once again. Will drag down some Rebels too.

    (hopefully will get a name badge this time and I'm writing here)

  • Dont change the 2/10 plexes! in EVE Technology and Research Center

    I support this. Heild wont be the same with this change

  • Weekend One Contest: Predict the Winner for Razer Gaming Peripherals in EVE Communication Center

    Expendables