EVE Forums

Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2008-05-09 04:10
  • First Forum Visit: 2011-10-12 12:40
  • Number of Posts: 104
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 0


Security Status -0.3
  • Collapsed Out Member since
  • Pandemic Legion Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Projectors in EVE Technology and Research Center

    I still don't feel that changes to Shadows are good after testing them some more. Their F3 tooltip also doesn't tell you any information. On top of the fact why would anyone suicide 2.4b worth of fighters each time just to kill something. They either need a better F3... or maybe long range fighters, or something. They're just worthless.

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Projectors in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Just went on sisi to test it all out. The sig radius' are pretty cool, can definitely hit them alot easier. But the Shadow still feels out of place. ALSO the tool tip is broken for it, it says it only deals thermal damage when it's loaded in your bay, not thermal/EM.

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Projectors in EVE Technology and Research Center

    I still don't see why anyone would use shadows over the ability to just use the F3 of regular heavies. Just make Shadows LR fibos.

  • [March] Rorqual and Mining changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    WTF I hate CCP now.

  • Nullification and Interdiction in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Poision Kevin wrote:
    +1 on timer on anchorable bubbles. Make it costly and non one time effort-less.

    10x Large T2 bubbles takes forever to kill in a 10 man cruiser roam and effectively makes even retards safe in ratting space.

    T3 cruisers with their subsystems serves a role. Interceptors kind of does too but with fozzie sov that being a thing... Sucks.

    Bloackde Runners Maybe, but tbh no I guess.

    Yachts Definetly yes.

    Shuttles, sure, a medium smartbomb will kill it or a sneeze.

    This pretty much... also all deployables give a killmail/lossmail. Make bubbles do the same. People will spam them less willy nilly if they get lossmails for them.

  • ♛♛ Bobmon for CSM 12 ♛♛ in Council of Stellar Management

    He's a good man. He'll listen to your problems and make you feel important even if it's the smallest issue. He is always a CSM member that I feel has all of our best interests at heart.

    ++ from me

  • Capri Sun KraftFoods - CSM XII in Council of Stellar Management

    Capri Sun KraftFoods wrote:

    I joined up again with my old friends from TISHU in AVRSE. My main character there is Capri Sun SUPERFOODS.

    If that's really your main in AVRSE, why wouldn't you post this with your main. Instead of your HK (alt?)?

  • ★★★ Tara Read Third Party Service ★★★ in EVE Marketplace

    Tara is a good man.

  • [Price Check] Moderately famous char/140m combat focused PVP goddess in EVE Marketplace

    Worth about 96,153,739,572.00 because all someone would do is strip your toon for SP.

  • ATXIV Match 123C Statement in EVE Communication Center


  • Citadel name/location endpoint? in EVE Technology and Research Center

    CCP Bartender wrote:
    It's not been forgotten about, but Tech Co is currently working flat out on the mobile app backend. We'll have some pretty exciting news for third party devs on that front ready some time Soon™, but until that's done the work on integrating ACL's into CREST will need to be on hold.

    For citadels to be successful and sustainable for alliances to live in them, the endpoints are probably the most important part. The mobile app, should be a much lower priority than making what we have already work. Rather than adding more stuff with bells and whistles, we just want what we already have polished.

  • Avatar fitting / HAW gun fitting requirements in EVE Gameplay Center

    elitatwo wrote:
    Are you using the t2 ones or the CONCORD ones? The CONCORD ones have better fitting and more ammo and can use t2 ammo.
    I found it difficult to fit t2 guns on a dread. The CONCORD ones cost more but on a 100b boat that should not be a problem.

    That's not the point of this conversation. It's that with the capital changes, the Avatar AND the Aeon suffer alot with CPU. Now Amarr generally suffer with CPU issues, but never this badly. It's to do with the fact that supers/titans weren't made with CPU balance ever being an issue, because before Citadel it wasn't.


  • [February] Force Auxiliary Skills in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Azahar Ortenegro wrote:
    Mane Frehm wrote:
    If not, then I recommend that at the time you release the Force Auxiliary ships, you refund all the SPs trained in both Carriers and Force Auxiliaries, AND you refund the 500 million ISK per skillbook for Carriers and Skillbooks. Players can then choose which they want with the necessary information at their disposal.

    Do get your act together; we've seen you do much better.

    This. Reimburse, and let the players choose what they want to do.

    I don't want to be refunded. I was a perfect DPS carrier AND triage carrier PRE-Citadel. I want to be a perfect DPS carrier and Triage carrier POST-Citadel. I shouldn't have to choose, I shouldn't have to spend more isk on something I already can do. I fail to see what people don't get about this.

    Ignoring the fact that we need to spend isk on 2 rank 12 fighter books, and the FAX machine book. IGNORING that it's at least 3 months of training to get back to the same square I'm at now. PLUS another month for every other racial carrier that I previously trained. Despite what some of you choose to believe some of us have characters that performed a DPS role AND a logi role with triage. I shouldn't have to choose to **** myself just because CCP want my money.

  • Steve Ronuken for CSM XI in Council of Stellar Management

    What's your take on passive income sources such as moon mining?

  • Noobman for CSM XI. W-space Candidate in Council of Stellar Management

    Noob is a good man for a wormholer... he has my vote.

  • SOLD in EVE Marketplace

    RoCkEt X wrote:
    3Better wrote:
    Aldjor Dayman wrote:
    Will you deliver to 1-SMEB?


    What about Faspera?


  • [Citadels] Capital Q&A in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Crtl + F: "Rorqual": 0 results found. RIP Rorqual

  • New Camera Controls in EVE Technology and Research Center

    You really should have a 4th option to allow us to keep the old camera at all times. Most times for smaller gang pvp you don't want the camera detached from yourself, I can't see ever wanting first person mode and the orbit camera feels more for people that are making videos vs. looking for optimal knowledge of their surroundings.

    When I pvp I'm always fully zoomed out with the tacitcal overlay on, I don't want to be zoomed in at any point looking at my ship as it doesn't help with positioning. And I don't want the camera to ever uncenter from my ship so I lose perspective in a fight.

  • [Focus Group] Capital Ships Signup in EVE Technology and Research Center

    I'll toss my hat into the ring. I've use capitals for years. I lived in wormholes both as a resident and as a person just looking to farm anomalies. I've also been the CEO of a mid-size alliance in lowsec utilizing capitals and supers at times. I've seen the complications of trying to use them in small groups and the different complications from using them in big groups now that I'm in PL.

    I got this!

  • Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading in EVE Information Center

    ISK for SP, this is what happens when we let people that haven't played EVE for greater than 2 years onto the CSM. How can this even be remotely considered a good idea?

    Not once have vets ever seriously thought this was a good idea. This is just bad. Just 100% bad.