EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2008-03-13 20:40
  • First Forum Visit: 2011-04-08 13:59
  • Number of Posts: 23
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 32

El Liptonez

Security Status -2.0
  • AQUILA INC Member since
  • Verge of Collapse Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • Eve online oder WoW in Deutsches Forum

    Vivien Meally wrote:
    Ich glaube es ist Falsch EVE mit WOW oder irgend einem anderem Spiel zu vergleichen.
    Mir ist keine ähnliches Spiel wie EVE bekannt. Die Komplexität und die Ausarbeitung ist einfach phänomenal.
    Ich merke immer wieder, das dieses Spiel mit verdammt viel leibe zum Detail von Geeks und für Geeks gemacht wurde.
    Und das schlimme ist, es wird nie wieder so ein Spiel mehr geben.


    Theorycrafting in EVE ist ein Witz gegen das von WoW. Selbst die meisten WoW-Spieler wissen das nicht.

    In WoW wird um Nachkommastellen optimiert. Da kommt es drauf an, ob man 0,1% mehr DPS macht oder nicht. Dafür werden Programme geschrieben, die simulieren wie ein Spieler optimal zu spielen hat. Simcraft ist dabei die erste Anlaufstelle. Einfach mal auf den Link gehen, etwas runterscrollen und einen von den Links anklicken. Wo hat EVE etwas ähnliches? Das ist Komplexität.

    Und weil das Simulieren zum Optimieren nicht genug ist, werden auch nach dem Spielen die Kampflogs noch ausgewertet. Das sieht dann so aus. Einfach mal auf "Buffs" klicken. (rip langsame PCs). Locker 100MB+ an Daten, die 20 Mann in 3-4 Stunden generieren.

    EVE dagegen? EFT-warrioring, bei dem unendliche Diskussionen um das optimale Fitting gibt, weil es keine objektive Bemessungsgrundlage gibt. Nutzlose Combat Logs.

  • EvE und die Frauen... in Deutsches Forum

    Wie andere schon gesagt haben, EVE und WoW sind fast komplett verschieden (nicht nur quietsch-bunt-grafisch). Imo ist EVE von Grund auf ein kompetetives Spiel, während WoW das nur ist, wenn man es so spielen möchte.

    Ich hab selbst gute zwei Jahre lang EVE für relativ kompetetives WoW an den Nagel gehängt. Und es fällt schon sehr auf wie viele Frauen WoW spielen, nicht nur im Vergleich mit EVE. Gerade wenn man erst mit WoW anfängt und sich in den Casual-Gilden umher treibt, findet man locker allein in deren Raids gute ~30% Frauen. In den zwei Jahren hab ich dort locker 100+ Frauen im TS gehört. Ich spiele seit 7+ Jahren EVE, und die Menge an Frauen die ich seither im TS/Vent gehört habe, kann ich an einer Hand abzählen. Eine einzige davon hat in einer der Top-Allianzen von EVE gespielt (TRI). Der Rest nur in Renter-/Petallianzen.

    Nach oben hin allerdings sieht es in WoW nicht anders aus als in EVE. Ich bin selbst nach ca einem halben Jahr in meine erste Top-1000-Gilde, dort hatten wir in unserem eigenen Roster keine Frau, von zwei rivalisierenden Gilden wusste ich, dass sie jeweils 1-2 Frauen dabei hatten. Ein Jahr später gings dann in meine aktuelle, zu der Zeit Top-100-Gilde, und wenig überraschend gibt es dort keine Frauen. Wenn ich mal die Gelegenheit hatte, mit Leuten von ähnlichem/höheren Skilllevel zu raiden (inklusive Top 10 world), ebenfalls keine Frauen. Das hält sich dort auch locker im einstelligen Prozentbereich.

    Die Grundeinstellung Frauen gegenüber ist meiner Erfahrung nach im kompetetiven WoW generell alles andere als positiv. Viele fangen an simple statistische Fakten über die Geschlechterverteilung mit Vorurteilen zu mischen und am Ende kommen dabei teilweise ziemlich miese Kommentare zu Tage. Je weiter es ranking-mäßig nach oben geht, desto dünner wird die Menge an Frauen. Einige der Leute, mit denen ich raide, haben sicherlich seit Jahren keine Frau mehr im TS gehabt. Und das merkt man, wenn sie dann doch mal auf eine Treffen, sei es bei nem Twinkraid oder einer Bewerbung. Da werden sich die Logs angeschaut... Festgestellt, dass sie scheiße spielt - und am Ende heißt es: "Ist doch klar, ist ja auch ne Frau." Dass 9/10 Bewerbern scheiße spielen, spielt dabei keine Rolle.

  • [Aegis] Missile balance package in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Any chance of a m³ reduction on heavy missiles as well? 4 damage types x 3 ammo types (faction, precision, fury) makes for 12 sets of missiles that one should carry in PVP. Especially in a RHML boat the amount of cargo required for heavy missiles is extraordinary compared to the other ammo types.

  • Phoebe Issues in EVE Information Center

    edit: posted in issue thread instaed.

  • Phoebe Feedback in EVE Information Center

    http://i.imgur.com/wvoVNel.png

    Sell order form is only 8 digits long. Would also love if the contents were pre-selected for easy overwriting/copypasting.

    Edit: As you can see the percentage is also unreadable on 90% UI.

  • Looking for 0.0 PVE home for two ratting alts in EVE Corporations, Alliances and Organizations Center

    Hi!

    I'm looking for a nullsec-based PVE corp for my two ratting alts. I haven't actively been playing in over a year and am just looking to make some ISK every now and then when I'm bored to pay for plex.

    I'll provide full API to both characters if required. The character I'm posting with is my main and not going to join your corp. If that's an issue to you, please don't bother replying.

  • The new launcher in EVE Communication Center

    Except the launcher seems to remove all my client settings. So **** that.

    I'm not going through countless whine threads until I find the solution to the launcher being useless,

  • Hi Resolution Texture Pack - Show Your Support!!! in EVE Communication Center

    As someone who is disappointed with the quality not being much better than the previous ones, yes, please.

  • [Video] Campigenus (verge movie) in EVE Communication Center

    taylor04 wrote:
    Fantastic vid m8,

    I don't like hearing my voice but 10/10 for me

    But you have the voice of an angel?

  • Ayeson for CSM8 - Laying the framework of the future in Council of Stellar Management

    But what about wormhole mass stabilizers? Straight

    Also, tl;dr.

  • WTS Sanity in EVE Marketplace

    Friendly bump

  • WH Should be Nerfed! in EVE Gameplay Center

    OP is 100% right.

    More k-space exits so we can gank more idiots like him (especially when they try to enter w-space).

  • AHARM failscade? in EVE Gameplay Center

    My god that was the biggest amount of butthurt I have read in a long time. The consistency of nonsense, stupidity and random facts in your posts are striking.

    To your appreciation here's the Aquila member list that proves we don't RMT:

    7actical Assassin - main
    Aeryn Nocturna - tay alt
    Aeth Gemulus - tay alt
    andy jinx - tay alt
    Anny Boudy - tay alt
    Azbogah - tay alt
    Baldrick Fish - tay alt
    Battousai Uta - tay alt
    Billy Beans - tay alt
    Bothius - tay alt
    brutal cupcake - tay alt
    Captain Longstreet - tay alt
    Captain S04p - tay alt
    Cho Wong - tay alt
    Civian - tay alt
    Coota Ali - tay alt
    Cralen - tay alt
    crazyfists - tay alt
    Crime time - tay alt
    Cutter John - tay alt
    Dackan - tay alt
    Destrukter - tay alt
    Diego Sarmoti - tay alt
    Diemetri - tay alt
    Ecaterina Andro - tay altnescu
    El Liptonez - tay alt
    Ellatan Deruimte - tay alt
    Enguerrand DeCoucy - tay alt
    Erebus Gale - tay alt
    Estrella Oscura - tay alt

  • NATWO vs W-arsaw Pact in EVE Gameplay Center

    Nuadaa wrote:
    The gods of rollin' must have been on your side.
    I wonder though... with access to an awesome wormhole mapping tool and its juicy Intel...
    Could I resist?


    Do you mean our little siggy addon?

    http://i.imgur.com/zpBI7.png

    Yes, we had some good "luck".

  • A Closed Chain... "working as intended"? in EVE Gameplay Center

    Looking at how you've been in four class 4's, that's 50% of the systems that never have a k-space exit. I am not entirely sure about C5s and C6s, but most, if not all of those only come with w-space statics too.

    You only were in four systems that could in theory have k-space exits but aren't bound to, you didn't even get unlucky. Complaining about not finding a k-space exit in four wormholes is like complaining the droprate of nanoribbons has been nerfed when you didn't get a single one from two anoms.

  • The sad state of WH PvP in EVE Gameplay Center

    I fail to see the problem here. I share the opinion that Gnaw gave as first reply to this thread.

    It seems we got used to the fact that wormholes are a little playground where stalking and hiding come with better results than numbers. It used to be the same in EVE since forever. Five years ago or so every major alliance used to fly what they wanted to fly in PVP, so people with superior skill killed them to no end using sniper hacs. In recent history it was armor hacs, then it was abaddons, then nagas. The average alliance slowly catches up to those that invent and exploit new tactics.

    This is what is happening in wormholes just as it does in 0.0. People started flying flying T3 fleets ages ago, with the rise of dreads + triage carriers running anoms people switched from Guardians to Archons for RR, R&K showed us how Bhaalgorns worked, now everyone flies dreads + carriers + bhaalgorns, t3s, there's not much left to get an edge over anyone else other than numbers.

    I don't see how people are more risk-averse in wormholes than they are in 0.0. In contrast to 0.0, people in wormholes fly T3s as the "standard" ship instead of Drakes, they throw around now 2-4b capitals and 1b faction BS which you never see in 0.0.

    You don't get no PVP in wormholes because people don't want to fight, you get none because only a fraction of the inhabitated wormholes contain PVP corporations/alliances. There's 50 or so "notable" WH corporations/alliances in the ~300 high class wormholes we have, of those 50 only another fraction actually focus on PVP, they are spread out through different timezones and member sizes, which in the end results in a tiny possibility of somewhat "even" PVP happening in wormholes.

    Since you mentioned our alliance. We don't roam 0.0 because no one would fight us in wormholes (as in they're afraid of doing it). The chance to find something to shoot in wormholes (even just bearing people) is so small it's not worth wasting all our time for.
    We don't magically get a lot of good fights in 0.0. Literally no one fights us in 0.0 without at least at 2:1 numbers advantage, I'd say 3:1 to 5:1 are the average response rates to our gangs going around in 0.0. I don't like it either, but I have to live with it and got used to it instead of complaining much.

    All this is not a "problem" of wormholes, it's a problem in the concept of the game and holds true anywhere from wormholes to 0.0, to low and high sec.

    Learn to live with it or go do something else.

  • [Auction] Etana (Alliance Tournament X Logistics Cruiser Prize) in EVE Marketplace

    Tex Bloodhunter wrote:
    With those Energy Transfer bonuses you should sell them in packages of two. Otherwise they are only half as effective really ...


    notsureifserious.jpg

  • BEAST MODE ATX 10 : Verge of Collapse in EVE Communication Center

    ROSSLINDEN0 wrote:
    Nevets Estevan wrote:
    WarGod wrote:
    Rengas wrote:
    Love the prematch snippets lol.

    No faith!



    You appear to have something suck over your right eye. May i help by not repping you?


    i caught a germ on my right eye

    I have something wrong with my eye aswell, i think Rengas has been farting on our pillows again


    It's clawing its way into my eye. Cry

  • Self destructing in EVE Gameplay Center

    Vjorn Angannon wrote:
    Sad Ok, stupid question time.... Sad

    What do ya'll mean by "systemlocked assts"?

    Self destructing assets locked in a system.

  • Who was your MVP of Alliance Tournament X? in EVE Communication Center

    Fatyn.

    But you also have to consider Tay + WarGod for epic 1% structure tanking.