EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2007-08-25 00:07
  • First Forum Visit: 2012-04-03 18:05
  • Number of Posts: 423
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 840

EvilweaselFinance

Security Status 0.0
  • DJ's Retirement Fund Member since
  • Goonswarm Federation Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • [118.6] Capital Balancing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    I mean generally, there's no reason to restore the ECM immunity to siege or bastion mode either. That was a good change that made the game more interesting and stopped people from entirely shutting down an important aspect of combat. I don't understand why you would instantly revert that change without letting it play out, while leaving in things that are obviously unbalanced for years that PL and other ~elite~ groups aren't complaining about.

    Capitals were rebalanced to be better at killing subcaps, and part of that change was they became more vulnerable to subcaps. Now, suddenly, they're losing that downside and keeping the upside. That seems like a dumb design decision, and if you want to go that direction then HAWs and light fighters should get nerfed into the ground as well.

    Listrentite wrote:

    For a smaller group to fight a larger entity in a wormhole, triage is almost essential. A group such as HK can field more than enough guardians while you doing the same would restrict the numbers for the rest your fleet. With no ECM immunity, the larger entity simply fields jams for your triage and you've instantly lost. This allows smaller entities to take more engagements.


    Triage gave you a significant boost to ECM resistance. It wasn't like a single falcon could jam a FAX: you need a LOT of ecm to do it. If you have that much ECM, then you have sacrificed a lot of dps. If you've forced the hostile fleet to bring enough ECM you can't effectively triage then you're already significantly ahead.

  • [118.6] Capital Balancing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    look we all realize tishu is terrible you don't need a foot and a half long quote every time you want to say it

  • [118.6] Capital Balancing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    seriously the ECM change to triage is dumb as hell, they were in a good place for everyone except the pl guys who were whining up a storm that they could get ecmed in triage if we brought 200 ecm ships

  • [118.6] Capital Balancing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    What was the problem with being able to ECM force auxiliaries, besides that they couldn't be completely invulnerable entosis platforms?

  • Dev Blog: CSM 11 Election Results in EVE Information Center

    Huang Mo wrote:
    Frostys Virpio wrote:

    What if people didn't vote because they think it's the best way to show you they don't think the CSM represent them anyway?


    I voted but am discouraged from doing it in the future as _none_ of my candidates made it. Block voting is killing the election but I don't have any idea what to do about it :-(

    bloc voting has no particular power in stv besides 'fill out all of your ballot, morons' expanding the voting power of bloc voters slightly compared to people who effort out at three

    you can't blame this on the big bad blocs, we won fair and square because the overwhelming majority of people support us

    well, support one of us, we sure don't support each other :v:

  • Dev Blog: CSM 11 Election Results in EVE Information Center

    When did it change from top 2 to top 4 were perma-seats? I thought only two were announced at fanfest.

  • Congratulations Xenuria and other new CSM members in EVE Communication Center

    thanks for convincing yourselves that your vote didn't matter, highsec

  • Recurring Opportunities coming soon in EVE Technology and Research Center

    please count highsec miners as npcs as there are no meaningful differences between the two

  • [WTS] 34M Metal Scraps in EVE Marketplace

    kernel69 wrote:
    http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Reprocessing

    in Null in a proper station, you yield about 20% more of Trit.
    the rest is my markup for the 'mineral compression convenience'.

    This is not true. As metal scraps are "scrapmetal" nullsec outposts are not bonused for reprocessing them. They reprocess the same anywhere.

  • Dev blog: Overlays, ISK Buyer Amnesty and Account Security in EVE Information Center

    I don't have any questions but I do really appreciate the clarity in that mega-response to questions.

  • First Maxed Eve account. in EVE Communication Center

    Deck Cadelanne wrote:
    Lan Wang wrote:
    PsiMin wrote:
    Lathael wrote:
    This destroys a lot for me. Ouch.

    Can someone do the math for me and tell me how much that costs?

    Thx in advance *sigh*



    CCP has destroyed this game as its now P2W


    yawn so ironbank is officiallly the strongest and most elite character in the game, undefeatable because he paid to win and nobody is as high ranked as him because thats what pay2win is right?

    its not winning its just epeen, nothing more, showing off how he has so much isk to be able to do pointless things


    He is not undefeatable. No one is.

    You should try PVP more before making such stupid statements.

    you are, by far, the best person at recognizing sarcasm in the entire universe

  • First Maxed Eve account. in EVE Communication Center

    we have truly lost something with the demise of the ability of 2003 players to always have more SP than new players

  • First Maxed Eve account. in EVE Communication Center

    Good for him. Too bad he beat Aryth to it.

  • Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion in EVE Information Center

    SurrenderMonkey wrote:
    Querns wrote:

    People were saying the same thing about Liquid Ozone last time, too. Yet, here we are, with LO3 barely affected.




    Before: Fully mining out a high sec belt provides fuel for a single large tower for 436 hours.
    After: Fully mining out a high sec belt would provide enough stront to fuel a single large tower for <10 hours.


    Before: Fully mining out a deep null belt provides enough fuel to run a single large tower for 3670 hours.
    After: Fully mining out a deep null sec belt would provide enough stront to fuel a single large tower for 699 hours.


    Not exactly the same thing as liquid O, which is basically the bottleneck that gives the "before" values.

    The overwhelming majority of deep null belts are not cycled. There is plenty of room here.

  • Dev blog: Structure fitting in the EVE: Citadel Expansion in EVE Information Center

    Stront use in citidels has to be higher than current use because currently it is a garbage byproduct ice, rather than the King Of Ices like it was supposed to be.

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: Skills, Modules and Refitting in EVE Information Center

    Skia Aumer wrote:
    Rowells wrote:
    Skia Aumer wrote:
    Capital Emergency Hull Energizer
    Doomsday immunity. Did I read that correct?

    Also, I can refit a new one after 20 sec cycle is over, and start a new cycle - is that legit? It makes my ship almost invulnerable if I click fast enough. Which makes me think I've got something wrong.

    I think once a module is burnt out, you need to refit it with services. And if you have a weapons timer, you can't do that. If you're job is to literally DD troll Titans, then maybe.

    Alright, it makes my ship invulnerable if I manage to de-agress.
    Still sounds like BS.

    Edit: Last time my supercarrier died, it lasted a lot longer than 60 second under focus fire. And its loss I could predict maybe 15 minutes (!) in advance. So de-agressing is not that hard.

    i don't know about your titan, but MY TITAN would not last long being in hull only even if it was invulnerable for 20 of every 60 seconds without crazy amounts of on-field reps

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: Skills, Modules and Refitting in EVE Information Center

    Custos Stratos wrote:
    EvilweaselFinance wrote:
    Custos Stratos wrote:
    What if we already have all the Fighter skills? Do we have to skill the new skills as well or do we also get Light and Support Fighters?

    you have to train the new skills for the new fighters, why would you expect anything else



    Because the Fighter Bomber skill also becomes the new Heavy Fighter skill.

    I would expect players to get the Light and Support Fighter skill at the lvl they have Fighter skill now tbh.

    that skill is changing name and still applying to the exact same thing

    jesus, the entitlement mentality of people where every little change must be accompanied with gift-wrapped SP that newbies will not get is insane

  • Changes in CSM Managment in Council of Stellar Management

    Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
    CCP Guard wrote:
    Don't forget to vote in the coming election!


    I'd love to, if there was any point. Nullsec voting blocks determine the CSM, as always.

    that's right, if you're not part of a nullsec bloc don't bother to vote

    do bother to tell your friends not to vote though

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: Skills, Modules and Refitting in EVE Information Center

    Custos Stratos wrote:
    What if we already have all the Fighter skills? Do we have to skill the new skills as well or do we also get Light and Support Fighters?

    you have to train the new skills for the new fighters, why would you expect anything else

  • Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: Skills, Modules and Refitting in EVE Information Center

    Is there more coming on remote capital reps? The bonuses a force aux gets to those don't seem like the remote capital reps are going to be nerfed much, which suggests that supercarrier spidertanking won't go away.