EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2008-05-05 20:28
  • First Forum Visit: 2012-06-03 18:58
  • Number of Posts: 889
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 0

Galaxy Pig

Security Status -10.0
  • New Order Logistics Member since
  • CODE. Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • ALIENS! in EVE Communication Center

    Nope.

  • Forum moderating in EVE Communication Center

    Alexander Bor wrote:
    Through some period of time I have been observing how wide ISD stuff use their rights on this forum. Especially blocking topics.
    The recent is https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=515474&find=unread.

    I voice dissent to such a policy. There wasn't harassment or EULA breaking. If there were post out of tread then ISD stuff should do it's job and remove them. If they are too lazy for this then this is not the reason to block topics.
    If such a practice continue I think every normal person should leave this forum and the game maybe too.


    Lol all the normal people already did leave.

  • If CODE owns highsec... in EVE Communication Center

    Salvos Rhoska wrote:
    Black Pedro wrote:
    It's all good friend. In fact most highsec content creators recommend a healthy balance of targets as part of their daily content-creation regimen. New players, just like older players should feel the danger and excitement of undocking into our shared Thunderdome and not be left out like the poor unwanted kid never picked to be on a team by the other children. Besides, they will never improve if never challenged.


    We've knocked heads on this before, but I still hold to leaving the obvious legit fresh off the boat noobs alone till they grow a bit.

    Or atleast reimburse their loss, even if they react with anger.

    I know noob tears are often extremely salty and delicious, but their ships arent worth crap for profit, but are all the noob has.

    Hell, Im not space-rich by any stretch, but if someone preys on a legit noob and doesnt want to reimburse them themselves, send me the killmail (+ tear log if possible :D) and I will reimburse them myself.

    More retention is good, and Ill put my money where my mouth is to ensure that.


    Yeah?

    Expect the referals to start coming in later today. Big smile

  • If CODE owns highsec... in EVE Communication Center

    Alever Minmatar wrote:
    Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
    Alessienne Ellecon wrote:
    If CCP frowns on you killing noobs


    Ah but CCP doesn't frown on our killing new players. We're only (and quite reasonably) prevented from killing them in certain systems.

    If CCP objected to our killing new players, they'd make them invulnerable for their first few weeks. Or simply forbid it as some kind of exploit. They do not do so, therefore our campaign marches forward. As James has said, it's really best to introduce new players to The Code quickly, before their minds can be poisoned with the carebear cyanide dispensed by well-meaning but misguided folks like your goodself.

    im am going to abuse this by sitting outside these certain systems and murder every one that leaves them


    Oh! Renyn is a good system for that. Always a ton of ventures in Renyn ;)

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    See guys, Drac views these discussions as mere forum PVP, meaning that his arguments don't actually have to be grounded in reality (as we've all observed). All he's trying to do is win the argument by claiming the same nonsense over and over ad nauseum.

    Oh, and he cries about that one Nerf.
    (He'll be along shortly to insist he's not crying)

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Salvos Rhoska wrote:

    CODE "members" have been screwed.
    Which makes the CODE concept twice as hilarious, successful, and eminently EVE.

    Did you idiots think CODE cares about you?
    CODE is cashing out, and you arent getting a single isk for it.


    -From when Salvos thought the Kusion heist was real

    That was great.

    You guys 'member that? Big smile

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Dracvlad wrote:


    Ha ha. blubbering, nope, maybe a bit salty that it was killed stone dead...


    Lmao, because everyone knows that AG CAN'T POSSIBLY muster more than a few ECM frigs for a fleet.

    So what you're saying is that CCP acknowledges the utter, hopeless incompetence of AG, and actually makes balance changes centered around that unalterable fact of reality?

    Well, I suppose if there's one thing in this crazy world you can count on, it's that AG fails.

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Dracvlad wrote:
    Galaxy Pig wrote:
    Dracvlad wrote:
    Dom Arkaral wrote:

    Tell me
    How many nerfs has AG had in the past years? I want to see that exhaustive AG Nerf list

    You sure as hell seem to forget that ganking has, despite all appearances, being nerfed in many more ways than the opposite... yet, you don't see any "ganking needs a buff" threads pop out everyday..
    That's what makes gankers better players... they adapt instead of taking to the forums and crying over and over Lol


    They cry to CCP on things that matter like wreck EHP... and they get things changed for their advantage, lol.


    So what you're saying is that, even when it comes to lobbying, we completely outclass you?


    Thanks for confirming it but it was already confirmed and admitted too. The lobbying by gankes that is...


    Seeing as how I first heard of this issue, and only ever hear about this issue from your blubbering, I'm not so sure I'm qualified to confirm it.

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Dracvlad wrote:
    Galaxy Pig wrote:
    Dracvlad wrote:
    Dom Arkaral wrote:

    Tell me
    How many nerfs has AG had in the past years? I want to see that exhaustive AG Nerf list

    You sure as hell seem to forget that ganking has, despite all appearances, being nerfed in many more ways than the opposite... yet, you don't see any "ganking needs a buff" threads pop out everyday..
    That's what makes gankers better players... they adapt instead of taking to the forums and crying over and over Lol


    They cry to CCP on things that matter like wreck EHP... and they get things changed for their advantage, lol.


    So what you're saying is that, even when it comes to lobbying, we completely outclass you?


    Thanks for confirming it but it was already confirmed and admitted too. The lobbying by gankes that is...


    What's it like to fail at literally everything?

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Infinity Ziona wrote:

    There are no real consequences now. When Ovuer wrote that the consequences were very great today they're not. That's the crux of the issue.


    Wow. You are an amazingly full of crap individual.

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Dracvlad wrote:
    Dom Arkaral wrote:

    Tell me
    How many nerfs has AG had in the past years? I want to see that exhaustive AG Nerf list

    You sure as hell seem to forget that ganking has, despite all appearances, being nerfed in many more ways than the opposite... yet, you don't see any "ganking needs a buff" threads pop out everyday..
    That's what makes gankers better players... they adapt instead of taking to the forums and crying over and over Lol


    They cry to CCP on things that matter like wreck EHP... and they get things changed for their advantage, lol.


    So what you're saying is that, even when it comes to lobbying, we completely outclass you?

  • Alphas and F2P Have Failed in EVE Communication Center

    Is that turn of phrase taboo or something? You'll have to help me out here, I don't keep up with internet culture...

    Hey, you know your snarky little comments also count as tears, right? Yup. Clear and evident butthurt.

  • Alphas and F2P Have Failed in EVE Communication Center

    Look at the OP's corp name, dude. It's pretty obvious that his entire identity is defined by butthurt over the New Order.

  • Alphas and F2P Have Failed in EVE Communication Center

    Zarek Kree wrote:
    Galaxy Pig wrote:
    All glory be to James 315. This thread of tears over the New Order is still going.

    #mostrelevantallianceinthegame



    QuestionQuestionQuestionQuestion I don't think you actually read the thread. How is it that you think this thread is about "tears over the New Order"?


    Oh, believe me, I've read the thread. It's been entertaining me for days!

    You gotta read between the lines of this thread, it's pretty stealthy, but it's definitely a tear thread over the New Order.

    Post #291

    Galaxy Pig wrote:
    Arthur Aihaken wrote:
    Electronic Arts likes F2P models...


    And here we have it.

    This entire thread is tears.

    This whole topic is just designed to support the narrative of fail anti-gankers. The whole "CODE. is killing the game so CCP made alphas to fluff up the numbers so they can sell the game."

    It's tinfoil, but more than that, it's tears.

    Another threadnaught full of tears over the New Order. Lol


    All glory be to the Savior of Highsec, James 315. Peace and blessings be upon him.

  • If CODE owns highsec... in EVE Communication Center

    The tears in this thread are nectar.

  • If CODE owns highsec... in EVE Communication Center

    Alessienne Ellecon wrote:
    Tisiphone Dira wrote:
    So well done on revealing to us your until-now secret rebel organization?

    Well done lads, another CODE. sting operation was a success!


    Hardly. Roll I never said we were a secret organization, I said we work behind the scenes; that is, our work doesn't involve killboard whoring or flashy propaganda pieces, but simple outreach via private channels and in-chat discussions.


    So you guys don't do anything? Am I getting that right?

  • Alphas and F2P Have Failed in EVE Communication Center

    All glory be to James 315. This thread of tears over the New Order is still going.

    #mostrelevantallianceinthegame

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    So you're giving up at this too. Huge surprise.

    Just concede that AG is fail and try to distance yourself from them, good strategy bro.

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Dracvlad wrote:
    ...my biggest regret during the brief time that AG was able to operate on an equal footing to the gankers...



    That change just BROKE you guys, didn't it?

    I can't even imagine what it's like to be so easily defeated and demoralized.

    If I were you, I'd be trying to downplay this humiliation rather that bringing it up at every opportunity, reminding people just what a bunch of hopeless quitters you are.

  • How many more players must we lose to bullying in EVE Communication Center

    Dracvlad wrote:
    ...of course AG fails...


    Also, this I going in my sig.

Forum Signature

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com