EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2011-05-23 15:18
  • First Forum Visit: 2012-02-16 12:37
  • Number of Posts: 38
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 0

Herrin Asura

Security Status -4.5
  • Covert Operations Agency Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • The "Thera Public Intel" channel in EVE Communication Center

    No thx

  • Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation in EVE Communication Center

    This is great.
    Good decision CCP.

    You will lose subs but the game and the economy will get healthier and in my opinion that will help to get more real people into Eve Online.

    Today you showed us that you have the balls to make decisions against your income in favor of Eve and the Community. Thank you.

  • You decide in EVE Communication Center

    Texas Hold'em for ISK in stations.

    Jvpiter wrote:


    An impossible thing to ask for, but I would add the underpinnings of realistic physics: planets orbiting stars, gravity around planets and stars, orbiting stations.

    Such things don't make a huge difference in gameplay but would make the environment more dynamic to affect undock bookmarks, station camping, and so on.


    And this so much. You could create bookmarks relative to one or more celestials.

  • New Wormhole System Thera - The problem I see in EVE Communication Center

    Ka'Narlist wrote:
    Herrin Asura wrote:

    How do you create an instant undock bookmark in a crowded system where everyone will shoot everyone on sight?

    Take control of the undock area and let 1 guy create the bookmark


    Sounds like a plan. Lol

  • Breaking News: No more SP loss and clone grades in EVE Communication Center

    This change is great.

    The medical Clone was totally useless. I'm playing Eve since 2009 and never lost a single Skillpoint. Remembering to update the clone was just an annoyance.
    And I'm happy that more older players will go out and fight with cheap ships wich was punished before because of the high clone costs.
    Removing the medical clones leads to more fights and explosions wich is good.

  • New Wormhole System Thera - The problem I see in EVE Communication Center

    PotatoOverdose wrote:
    Not enough info on thera, although I think it will be awesome. Also interdiction nullifiers and instant undocks handle the whole station camp bit pretty well.


    How do you create an instant undock bookmark in a crowded system where everyone will shoot everyone on sight?

    The Thera idea is awesome nevertheless.

  • GFX updates, especially… DOMINIX in EVE Communication Center

    Baneken wrote:
    Herrin Asura wrote:

    Please update the Arazu. It's incredible ugly.


    Oh, go away, stop insulting my mutant banana. X


    Mutant banana? With this kind of imagination you should write a book.

    Seriously, I just needed a few more days to fly it and changed my training to Minmatar Cruiser because its just impossible for me to fly such an incredible ugly ship.

  • GFX updates, especially… DOMINIX in EVE Communication Center

    CCP Vertex wrote:
    It's still coming in a future update, don't worry!

    We have a few graphic updates in the coming releases that will more than make up for the wait!


    Please update the Arazu. It's incredible ugly.

  • So... About those Relic sites... in EVE Communication Center

    Lucrii Dei wrote:
    Abrazzar wrote:
    Reminder: If you don't hack all cans, the site won't despawn, which means no new site will spawn, which means on a roam you will find fewer sites, thus shooting yourself in your own foot.


    If I remember correctly, there was an update that despawns the sites if at least one container is hacked, after an hour I think it is?


    Thats correct.

  • (suggestion) Moar Data/Relic sites in low and null in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Dex Cordell wrote:
    more sites in absolutely uncrowded systems means more money, and if there would be a crowd to do the scavenging, my profit would be the same as now, less money to make, but with a much bigger chance, as the crowd moves on from one empty local to another...:)


    More sites mean less money because all the items you get from those sites wont be as rare as now, so the price falls.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Kat Ayclism wrote:

    You don't see it because people stopped flying BS doctrines due to bombers. Kinda ******* simple point there.


    Ah yes, and all the killmails from back then vanished too.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    So a single bomb would make ~3% dmg on a BS. I call that useless.
    I guess we have different mind sets on how to fix problematic PVP constelations. I would like to see a buff for fleets wich helps them to handle Stealth Bombers, you would like to see a nerf of bombs. Both would fix the problem but I honestly think that my way of thinking keeps the expierience for everyone more interesting.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Apothne wrote:


    Lockbreaker & Void bombs already exist. Void bombs are super cool!


    Yes, and if they add your bomb idea thats ok for me, but part of your idea was to make normal bombs useless against everything bigger than a frigate. That would change the Stealth Bomber to a debuff ship. Noone goes out on a bomb run to kill a frigate.

    In my opinion the only good solution would be a real good counter to bomb fleets. There is no point in making bomb runs less effective bc. its an awesome playstyle many people love. But a fleet whos aware of the existence of bomb squads should be able to take initiative of some kind to stop them. Something like a heavy cooldown pulse wich decloaks everything on grid for example.

    I don't know but I'm not a developer so I am happy that someone else has to find solutions and make such decisions.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Apothne wrote:

    Apoth ♥


    I don't like this idea tbh.
    Stealth Bombers are supposed to bomb and destroy stuff not to apply mass debuffs. I like your mass debuff idea for some kind of EWAR ship but not for Bombers.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    punch monke wrote:


    Why would they not decloak eachother? Been in fleets where literally 100bombers decloak and bomb in intervals. They are op and you got rid of the one change to address it. I meean you get in a fleet cloak, the squad commander warps them around, all they do is hit decloak, bomb, and warp off. Regroup and do it again. Doesn't take much effort, can do it afk.


    That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Guys, please stop being ridiculous.

    Nearly all bomber pilots I know would accept a bomber nerf bc. we know that we're kind of OP atm.
    But the cloak change was not the right way. CCP makes the life of all players better by implementing quality of life changes and this change would have been completley contrary to the way CCP is going the last few months.

    This change wouldn't even be a nerf, we would have been able to handle this changes and still bomb like before. Bombing would have been more annoying, yes but not less effective.

    We all know that a bomb nerf is incoming and I am happy that CCP changed their mind and thinks about better solutions to handle this problem.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    JoveBishop wrote:
    What a lame move.
    ******* crybabies win.


    Not really.
    Crybabies where the reason CCP came up with this ridiculous changes in the first place.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Thank you Fozzie!

  • Low Sec bubbles (not anchored ones) in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Please no.

  • [Phoebe] Stealth Bombers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    CCP Fozzie wrote:
    Hey everyone. Just wanted to let you know that I'm back from Vegas and all caught up on the thread.

    I want to remind people that any debates around isboxer are a separate issue from the changes listed in this thread. I completely understand that many of you have passionate opinions on that topic, but I should be clear that none of the people who are involved with CCP's policy towards isboxer are reading this particular thread.

    We received a lot of great feedback so far in this thread and at EVE Vegas, and we're currently taking another look over the changes to make sure they hit all the marks we are aiming for.

    Thanks again
    -Fozzie


    Good to hear. I hope you'll come up with a better solution. There are many better suggestions in this thread already.