Jenn aSide wrote: Gimme Sake wrote:
In Frosty's words "There's no risk for the scammer other than messing up a contract". That's just one sided gameplay.
". That is just one sided gameplay". Which is the other thing you are doing that is like the anti-gankers.
People that hate something ALWAYS focus on the 'lack of cost and one sided unfairness" of the thing they dislike.You and I both
have been telling the anti-gankers "it doesn't matter what it 'cost' the ganker, your job is to not get ganked in the 1st -place, USE THE TOOLS YOU HAVE instead of running to CCP for help" for several years now, which is why I'm shocked to see you using the anti-gankers playbook about an issue/game mechanics you don't like.
It smacks of hypocrisy TBH.
"There is no risk for the ganker, the catalyst getting CONCORDED is insignifigant"
You just mentioned a loss. Insignifiant YOU SAY, but a LOSS none the less.
SO it is YOU the one who considers losing a catalyst insignifiant. Not me.
All your preconceptions about my posts come from comparing my arguments with antigankers' and that is all the demeanor of your posting. You want to divert an eventual debate about game mechanic exploits towards a certain zone oozing of subjectivity.
I can do that too you know. I can compare you with the people in the T3c rebalance thread where the supreme argument is CCPlease dun nurf mah pwnmobile.
Because basically that's what you, your alts and other two or three players are trying to do in this thread:
Crying CCPlease dont nerf my scam mobile.