EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2009-11-21 20:39
  • First Forum Visit: 2012-08-20 00:39
  • Number of Posts: 779
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 0

Kenneth Feld

Security Status -1.8
  • Habitual Euthanasia Member since
  • Pandemic Legion Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Fighters, Supercarriers & Burst Projectors in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Burst Projectors

    That time should be quadrupled at least.

    40 sec warp bubble - LOL - no thanks

    The rest are just as laughable and they will get used no more than they do now, which is probably about zero

  • [March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    James Zealot wrote:
    Literally 45 seconds of work

    https://zkillboard.com/kill/49662844/

    To be fair, you'd have to split that 37 times :P Still can't get that for 45 seconds of work in PvE :P



    Nah, I supplied all the ships and ran the operation, I gave out some door prizes along the way

  • [March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Orca Platypus wrote:
    Kenneth Feld wrote:
    Orca Platypus wrote:
    Bronson Hughes wrote:
    Orca Platypus wrote:
    Either you never ratted yourself, or think that 6 million ticks the aforementioned abomination produced is "still ratting".

    Low tick rates are better than the zero tick rates you get when you dock up your T3 in fear of a Thrasher, or paying to replace a high-tick T3 because you shitfit it.

    Your call.


    Having low tick rates for hour is beaten by having proper tick for 20 minutes and spinning ship for the rest of the hour.

    PvE T3 has no chance against Thrasher. PvP T3 has no chance against rats. Pick your poison.



    If you gave up PvE and focused on PvP, you might make more isk

    Then you could afford more bubbles


    If you make more in PvP than in PvE, god, you suck at PvE so badly.



    Literally 45 seconds of work

    https://zkillboard.com/kill/49662844/

  • [March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Orca Platypus wrote:
    Bronson Hughes wrote:
    Orca Platypus wrote:
    Either you never ratted yourself, or think that 6 million ticks the aforementioned abomination produced is "still ratting".

    Low tick rates are better than the zero tick rates you get when you dock up your T3 in fear of a Thrasher, or paying to replace a high-tick T3 because you shitfit it.

    Your call.


    Having low tick rates for hour is beaten by having proper tick for 20 minutes and spinning ship for the rest of the hour.

    PvE T3 has no chance against Thrasher. PvP T3 has no chance against rats. Pick your poison.



    If you gave up PvE and focused on PvP, you might make more isk

    Then you could afford more bubbles

  • [March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Siegfried Hilanen wrote:
    another isk sink introduced by ccp.


    and all the big slow miners, must join a big blob.. or put up new bubbles every few days.. Like doing PI, (getting burned out yet?) and why? so ****** mcgee gets to not use his mwd? all these small gangs are nanofit anyways.


    lets face it rorqual mining is a success.


    the fact that you guys wanna generate a killmail out of this bubble, just shows how elite pvp you guys are.. /sadface











    You know, you can SCOOP them

    Then re deploy

  • [March] Mobile Warp Disruptor changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    PATCH DAY -

    DELETE ALL BUBBLES

    Then start over with the "New" bubbles


    Flame suit on motherfuckers

  • [February] Insurance in Upwell Structures & more from Team Five 0 in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Thallius O'Quinn wrote:
    My most pressing issue: does this mean rookie ships provided on docking with an empty ship hangar like in stations?



    Not only no, but hell no.

    Here is a tidbit that I am sure base on your previous request that will draw delicious tears - CCP has said they want to stop noob ships from being able to fit a cyno.

  • Dev Blog: New Security Features With EVE Online: Ascension in EVE Information Center

    OK, this is now OFFICIALLY beyond stupid

    I had to RE VERIFY my email address for EVERY account when I tried to get on SISI on the same computer I am already logged into

    On top of that it did NOT ask me for an authenticator code once I verified my email account again.

    I mean it is the SAME freaking launcher, same launcher, same computer....................

  • Dev Blog: New Security Features With EVE Online: Ascension in EVE Information Center

    So, I asked before, but I know a bit more now.....

    I travel 200,000 miles a year worldwide for work. I travel with 2 laptops, both play eve.

    I have attached authenticator to all relevant accounts

    If i go from the US to France for work, will the fact that I have entered an authenticator code on my laptops at home and checked the box do not ask again for this computer, negate any and all further interrogation, or will i have to enter a code for each account?

    If I do have to enter a code in France, will I have to re enter a code when I get back to the USA?

    What if I am in an airport and connect via wifi or use my phone hotspot, or wifi on the plane during a transatlantic flight. Most of those places bandwidth is limited and extra time to login sometimes makes a difference.

    Is there a way to turn all this off?

    I KNOW I am an edge case, but you can appreciate the level of frustration I am experiencing at this point. But, if doesn't mean it is any less frustrating for me.

    KF

  • [ASCENSION] Jump Range Changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Skia Aumer wrote:
    I like how discussion ceased after my proposal. Means everyone agrees and as there are no objections whatsoever. Hopefully CCP will lock the gates for capships by Christmas.



    Yeah, your idea was so bizarre, no one ever though you were actually serious

  • What's with this validate your email garbage? What if its closed? in EVE Communication Center

    Captain Tardbar wrote:
    Kenneth Feld wrote:
    So, what overrides what?

    I fly approx 200,000 miles a year for work.

    I login from my cell phone (one att, one verizon, plus vodaphone when in europe) I login from free wifi in airports, various airport clubs, hotels, airlines etc

    So, every time I change IP, I have to re verify 43 ******* accounts, are you insane?

    I have 2FA on my main accounts, but not on all of them

    Will having the launcher with the blue tacks ticked keep me from having to do it, or will I have to sit there and re verify every account, every time I change IP?

    What about every time the ******* launcher loses my accounts? (when I lose signal for whatever reason and the red boxes appear in the launcher, it erases everything)

    Sometimes, I don't have decent internet, just getting email is a chore

    Somehow this plan is looking worse and worse the more i think about it, even if I agree with the premise of the plan.


    Maybe this is CCP's solution to people who take multi boxing too far beyond reason.



    For one: If i only had a few accounts, it would still be horrendous with my travel schedule. I could potentially have to re enter my email stuff 2-3 times a day sometimes. It would definitely limit my ability to login

    As far as number of accounts - I am not even remotely close to having a LOT, not even remotely close. That said, 28 of them are 3 builders, that is it and are only subbed when needed to build. Until CCP allows more than 11 build jobs per pilot and 33 per account, I am stuck making more accounts to build stuff.

  • What's with this validate your email garbage? What if its closed? in EVE Communication Center

    So, what overrides what?

    I fly approx 200,000 miles a year for work.

    I login from my cell phone (one att, one verizon, plus vodaphone when in europe) I login from free wifi in airports, various airport clubs, hotels, airlines etc

    So, every time I change IP, I have to re verify 43 ******* accounts, are you insane?

    I have 2FA on my main accounts, but not on all of them

    Will having the launcher with the blue tacks ticked keep me from having to do it, or will I have to sit there and re verify every account, every time I change IP?

    What about every time the ******* launcher loses my accounts? (when I lose signal for whatever reason and the red boxes appear in the launcher, it erases everything)

    Sometimes, I don't have decent internet, just getting email is a chore

    Somehow this plan is looking worse and worse the more i think about it, even if I agree with the premise of the plan.

  • [Ascension] Capital Ship and Upwell Structure Blueprint Adjustments in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Tasuku Furukawa wrote:
    I disagree about increasing BPO research time.
    Many players started EVE after Crius update are taken pains by overwhelming research time and cost, especially some of the largest blueprints.
    Please take care of new players.



    The bonuses afforded by science rigs means the time are reduced IMMENSELY, this just somewhat normalizes them to the max allowed as we are today with a T3 caldari outpost

  • [Ascension] Capital Ship and Upwell Structure Blueprint Adjustments in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Rowells wrote:
    Kenneth Feld wrote:
    Rowells wrote:
    I'm assuming the negative effect on jobs done in POS, NPC stations, and outposts is intended? And if so, why?


    Pos are going away and the rest can't be killed. The idea behind the new structures is to have stuff to shoot

    So what's the purpose of needing POSes if they won't be gone for at least another year, or that suddenly NPC stations need this size of a nerf?



    POS won't go away until cyno beacons, jammer and jump bridges are moved to other structures

    Outposts can't be planted or upgraded after ascension, i would suspect if EC go well, by next expansion anchoring or science and industry modules will either be restricted or bonuses removed by then as well

  • [Ascension] Capital Ship and Upwell Structure Blueprint Adjustments in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Caps should be 50%, maybe 75%

    This affects system index as well

  • [Ascension] Capital Ship and Upwell Structure Blueprint Adjustments in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Jackie Fisher wrote:
    What happens to already installed jobs?



    99.999999% Nothing

  • [Ascension] Capital Ship and Upwell Structure Blueprint Adjustments in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Rowells wrote:
    I'm assuming the negative effect on jobs done in POS, NPC stations, and outposts is intended? And if so, why?


    Pos are going away and the rest can't be killed. The idea behind the new structures is to have stuff to shoot

  • [ASCENSION] Jump Range Changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Rob Kaichin wrote:
    Quote:

    Reintroduce a natural path for capital combat to escalate.
    Differentiate the power projection of Capitals and Sub-Capitals.


    Do you mean Super-capitals?

    Anyway, what's the interesting gameplay in having differentiated jump ranges for S-Caps and Caps, as compared to a flat buff for both of them?



    I think he means bridging i.e. Sub-caps

  • [ASCENSION] Jump Range Changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Kenneth Feld wrote:
    As a member of a small alliance, i think there's changes are bad for the game. PL/NC need to have their jump range nerves not buffed.

    How am i supposed to rat in safety in my Nyx



    ****, logged in wrong pilot to forums

  • [ASCENSION] Jump Range Changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    As a member of a small alliance, i think there's changes are bad for the game. PL/NC need to have their jump range nerves not buffed.

    How am i supposed to rat in safety in my Nyx