EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2011-12-24 22:18
  • First Forum Visit: 2014-04-08 18:47
  • Number of Posts: 32
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 29

Michael Oskold

Security Status -0.7
  • BURN EDEN Member since
  • Northern Coalition. Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • [March] Rorqual and Mining changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    good changes, godbless

  • [March] Structure, Drone & Fighter improvements from Team Five 0 in EVE Technology and Research Center

    looks gucci,

    godbless

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Suitonia wrote:
    Timm3h wrote:
    *tips orthrus*
    M' gameplay


    Unironically HIC scrams just made Orthrus' much more prolific, because it's one of the few kiting ships that can project outside HIC Scram range while also tackling ships outside HIC scram range. What HICs killed was solo brawling with MJDs entirely, cheap, affordable or accessible kiting ships (RIP anyone trying to just take out a nano thorax, cane or stabber etc.).

    Flying 100mn stuff + needing a Keres to even undock if you want to do non Orthrus stuff is getting boring.


    pretty much this. 36k scrams made plenty of things auto trash worthy. On ships that boast huge tanks and almost always run sebos to counter ecm, it was very frustrating to deal with. There was no counter gameplay, it was just "ggwp"

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    godbless

  • Medium AC rebalancing and the Stabber in EVE Gameplay Center

    reduce the fitting requirements on autos/arty might help. similar to the small arty buff. fitting is brutal on auto ships as is.

    in an era of hics, things that cant project outside of 30+km are dumpster tier (unless you ab/100mn) having functional artys on a fast ship that is lightly tanked would be amusing. takes skill to use without a tracking bonus.

    a slight damage buff might be required but i havent checked numbers. you have the advantage of damage choice(mostly) but to kite with autos you want barrage which negates that choice. feelsbadman

  • Zkill guide to Running for CSM 12 by rhiload in Council of Stellar Management

    Omega Crendraven wrote:
    [

    "I am noob solo pvper who hit f1 and scram with marauder or tank bonused ship and make dank meme video/stream, now im famous, now I am CSM "



    I SUPPORT RHILOAD IN THE CSM WARS


    I SUPPORT THE DAWA ON HYDE. REMOVE REMOVE

  • [December] Excavator Mining Drone yield rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Jean-Luc II wrote:
    nm Kain wrote:
    It's pretty clear that everyone is against the kind of nerf you are planning... CCP at it's finest. This is absolutely disgusting. 32% is far too much.

    My drones currently mine 1340m3, with the nerf that's 911m3, times that by 5, thats 6700m3 to 4555m3. Way to go to kill the mining community. We spend billions, are sitting ducks for 5 minutes and this isn't good enough?

    I swear. I feel like quitting.

    That's how angry I am. And they announce this days after I plex my accounts. Seriously considering not plexing my accounts after christmas.

    Yeah. Me and a load of people are not happy.


    I'm with you man and so are other miners I've spoken to who have invested big time into this. It baffles me why folks would insult you for saying how you feel about this. People have every right to feel angry about this. We are being asked to become a sitting duck for 5 mins and this is the result:

    https://zkillboard.com/ship/28352/losses/



    ive seen a rorq tank 15 blops and then panic when supers came in. He was solo so he died quietly and lost everything after we sat there for 5 mins waiting for him to come out. like unironically if he had a scram fit and punched a cyno for 4-5 dreads those supes/blops would have eaten ****. but no. you insist you are a helpless little miner in a belt just trying to make a living, but I dont buy it.

  • [December] Excavator Mining Drone yield rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    nm Kain wrote:
    "Oh please leave and don't come back. PLEASE. "

    How about you grow a brain and troll something more witty? Oh.. Wait... Growing a brain requires a brain. So your kinda screwed.

    "its okay we can help you with that )))"

    Adversity couldn't find themselves out of a paper bag.



    can't seem to find your rorquals anymore either, think we killed all of them :^)

    also i hear buying maze locations is a good investment, especially when there are baddies in local. can you c/d this?

  • [December] Excavator Mining Drone yield rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    nm Kain wrote:
    It's pretty clear that everyone is against the kind of nerf you are planning... CCP at it's finest. This is absolutely disgusting. 32% is far too much.

    My drones currently mine 1340m3, with the nerf that's 911m3, times that by 5, thats 6700m3 to 4555m3. Way to go to kill the mining community. We spend billions, are sitting ducks for 5 minutes and this isn't good enough?

    I swear. I feel like quitting.

    That's how angry I am. And they announce this days after I plex my accounts. Seriously considering not plexing my accounts after christmas.

    Yeah. Me and a load of people are not happy.


    its okay we can help you with that )))

  • [Citadels] Dreadnoughts in EVE Technology and Research Center

    S4ndman wrote:
    CCP Larrikin wrote:
    S4ndman wrote:
    Can someone explain to me why the nalgfar gets 2 turret slots while the other ones get 3 weapon slots?

    I'm not used to capital ships, but it made me curious.. Blink


    This is because of a limitation on the Nalgfar model. Long term, its something we want to fix :) For now the Nalgfar gets a bit of an advantage with ammo/modules required.


    So, comparing with the moros, that somehow shares the same kind of bonuses (damage/reps) there's a big gap between them? The moros looks much better then the nag.

    Thanks,

    o7


    nag is essentially capless post patch, making it extremely powerful. along with selectable damage and a utility high for a cap neut, they will be mean cap killing machines. the moros has the worst cap out of all the dreads currently and the rep bonus, while good on paper, isn't good functionally. moros will require nos + cap injects to be used(unless hull tank :D) but it is still a king of blap. and it also has void now B)

  • [Citadels] Dreadnoughts in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Panther X wrote:
    Well GG Amarr/Caldari your dreads have just been nerfed into uselessness.
    Why would anyone bother with them anymore when the Gallente Moros is vastly superior? The 3rd racial bonus for Rev/Phoenix is totally useless.

    Ugh


    you are in high flyers so i will assume you actually believe this. have fun dying to revs/phoenix post patch. B)

  • Recurring Opportunities coming soon in EVE Technology and Research Center

    the hysteria in this thread is hilarious. eve already has grind to skill with injectors. all ive seen from it is hilarious stories and people that are happy about having more control over what they need in a character.

    if there are daily activities that push you to get out (without being broken B) ) im all for it.

  • [Citadels] Titans in EVE Technology and Research Center

    i have to agree. i was expecting a change for the rag. What about a speed buff? B)

  • [Citadels] Titans in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Larus Raksha wrote:
    Why everyone gets 180% Damage and Caldari only 50%?


    it has a big rate of fire bonus. so less alpha but more damage over time.

  • [Citadels] Titans in EVE Technology and Research Center

    is the rag bonus a typo? (k wew im not crazy)

  • [Citadels] Carriers in EVE Technology and Research Center

    ive played with a bunch of these on the test server so far. im diggin the attention required. i think the thannys bonus is a bit lackluster in comparison to the rest. You shouldnt be afraid to make it the dps machine that it was meant to be. I would drop the hp bonus and buff the damage. I think the nid will see a fair bit of use in small gang and ratting because of the blessed speed bonus so im excited :3 also 2k+ nids are a thing on the test server B) (as well as nano archons :D)

  • Jin'taan for CSM XI in Council of Stellar Management

    have you ever flown a super? your prior comments seem to indicate otherwise.

    -1

  • [March] ECM Tiericide in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Mark Hadden wrote:
    keep dumbing down your game for idiots who cant remember which ECM module is against which race.
    Why dont you rename "radar" to "amarr", "ladar" to "minmatar" etc.. while you are at it, makes it even easier for rtards.

    Or go even one step further and get rid of race names and call them like red, green, yellow and blue maybe? For those who cant deal with race names and mix them together. This would make sure even the least intelligent moron would be able to safely apply right ewar modules onto enemy ships.


    says the guy in hoover. lmao

  • Noobman for CSM XI. W-space Candidate in Council of Stellar Management

    for real tho, noob is an active player and knowledgeable in wh going ons. if i had to pick someone who could give info and advice on the future of holes, it would be him.


    also he lent me a dread once which was nice. )

    +1

  • Noobman for CSM XI. W-space Candidate in Council of Stellar Management

    H ELLO AM 48 YEAR MAN FROM SOMALIA. SORRY FOR BAD ENGLAND. I SELLED MY WIFE FOR INTERNET CONNECTION FOR PLAY "e v e o n l i n e" AND I WANT TO BECOME THE GOODEST PLAYER LIKE YO U