EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2007-04-16 17:16
  • First Forum Visit: 2011-04-08 13:14
  • Number of Posts: 102
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 0

MissBolyai

Security Status -1.0
  • ElitistOps Member since
  • Pandemic Legion Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • Alliance Tournament XV: Seeding in EVE Communication Center

    Pretty sure Hydra should be ranked 37th

  • Questions for CSM 11 Live stream (Jan 29) in Council of Stellar Management

    Questions for the CSM:

    1. Do you know you don't do anything worthwhile?
    2. Have you ever thought about doing something worthwhile?
    3. Did you know that liquid ozone is not considered a charge?
    4. If the CSM has failed at impacting something as minor as #3, how can anyone expect you to have a positive impact on anything else in the game?

    regard

  • Dev Blog: EULA Changes Coming With EVE Online: Ascension in EVE Information Center

    DaOpa wrote:
    Grath Telkin wrote:
    CCP Falcon wrote:
    Good afternoon capsuleers!

    Today we're here to announce some changes to the EVE Online EULA that are coming with the launch of EVE Online: Ascension.

    You can read all about them in this Dev Blog, which includes a handy red-lined version of the new EULA that will come into effect on Tuesday, November 8th, 2016.


    Updates & Clarifications:

    The 90 day clause:

    Our policy on inactive accounts has not changed, we have simply shortened the notice period from six months to three months due to a potentially higher volume of account creation.


    So your own media is sparse, who do you suggest pays the writers that generate interest in your game now? Who pays the streamers that give newer players a glimpse of a game they might get hooked on?



    Longest EVE Online streamer, long time fansite / guide creator for EVE. I never needed nor took ISK from any gambling 3rd party to do what I do.

    never heard of you

  • WTS Erebus in EVE Marketplace

    91 bil and we can close tonight

    I'll cover the 3rd party fee

  • WTS 93b Erebus and Nyx 20b in EVE Marketplace

    91bil ready

  • [February] Wreck Hitpoint Rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    If there's nothing to stop this change, can you at least give us killmails for wrecks now?

  • [February] Wreck Hitpoint Rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Lucas Quaan wrote:
    MissBolyai wrote:
    Stupid change

    -1

    It just became a group task instead. ;)

    #AMT

    Do we have a artymach fleet comp? or do I just bring it as a flagship wreck dunker?

  • [February] Wreck Hitpoint Rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Stupid change

    -1

  • Manfred Sideous removal from CSM10 in Council of Stellar Management

    lmao csm is a joke anyway

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    Captain Thunk wrote:
    Hydra heads


    golfclapping the heck outta that wit

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    Bad Bobby wrote:
    You're entirely welcome to take everything I say out of context if you wish, but it's not going to lead to any meaningful debate on the issues.

    And as I have already said, I wasn't present when the alleged events took place, so I can't attest either way.

    If you've got any actual evidence, feel free to share it with the rest of us.

    We will continue to leave that to CCP. The court of public opinion has already spoken, as little sway as that might hold.

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    Bad Bobby wrote:
    MissBolyai wrote:
    Practice against? or Collude with?

    You told me they didn't need to collude to win. But I'm pretty sure everyone can do with some practice before a tournament.

    To make a sports analogy at the risk of you not getting it: The New England Patriots didn't need to cheat to get to the Super Bowl last year, but they did. That doesn't mean it is ok/legal.

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    Bad Bobby wrote:
    MissBolyai wrote:
    Practice against? or Collude with?

    You told me they didn't need to collude to win. But I'm pretty sure everyone can do with some practice before a tournament.

    C'mon man.

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    Bad Bobby wrote:
    MissBolyai wrote:
    if Camel had their own independent tournament pedigree, why did they need to share setups/ships/tactics with Warlords?
    Because they needed to practice against a top tier team in order to prepare themselves for the AT.

    Practice against? or Collude with?

    We'll leave the decision on that to CCP, but those logs and the information that's come out since DHB's post are pretty damning.

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    Bad Bobby wrote:
    MissBolyai wrote:
    Hydra doesn't have an AT team.
    If you say so.


    Am I wrong? http://community.eveonline.com/community/alliance-tournament/ I just crtl + f'd the snot out of that page for "hydra" and got 0 results.

    And if Camel had their own independent tournament pedigree, why did they need to share setups/ships/tactics with Warlords? Again, no one from PL (sans Rive) is saying that PL should have won, and the official stance of PL is that Warlords and Camel out-executed us on the last day. Trust me, I am the official spokesman for PL.

    But you're a dumbojet if you think that dhb's claims aren't significant and against the rules.

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    Bad Bobby wrote:
    HYDRA has always been more than just an AT team. Obviously the high profile of the AT team has a tendency to eclipse everything else.


    You mean Warlords of the Deep, right? Or are you talking about mother Hydra and her offspring Camel and Warlords?

    Hydra doesn't have an AT team. I understand the confusion though, and I think that's at the heart of CCP's inquiry.

  • Notice: Investgation and Prize Item Freeze for Teams in ATXIII in EVE Communication Center

    I guess I should sell my fiend now while they're worth about 100x what they were earlier today.

    WTS Fiend. PM me on the PL forums for details.

  • The Moment you realize you're the bad guy in EVE Communication Center

    Joe Public... I like your style.

  • The Moment you realize you're the bad guy in EVE Communication Center

    Sarah xCalibre wrote:
    Find it funny how so many people outside Camel and Hydra know what was going on, exactly what was said and how it was done but in all honest truth you know jack ****, you can guess but that doesnt make it true. Just cause someone post a snippet of a log (that can be fake) doesnt make anything true, how about we let ccp judge this at their best, hearsayin isnt proof in any case.
    However if it is true ccp it should be dealt with accordingly, everyone knew the rules when entering.

    Now lets take our sticky fingers out of this messs and let ccp do their job since its not ours but theirs to do. We got a year almost to discuss improvements for next AT and it should/need to be discussed. If this is true you forget about the 90% of the pilots DHB think was legit as well stop diminishing their hard work in this.

    I really like the CSM person for the AT idea but I think its hard for a single person to be totally objective if not near impossible.

    " I was spying on nulli this year, watching their undock ect (no hard feelings lawl), and they are a perfect example of how a good team does it. They saw hydra's setups, and instead of spending thousands of hours making their own meta chain, they skipped a lot of steps, borrowed all of hydra's teams, and flew the hell out of them to improve them as much as possible."

    Oh oh, so Nulli and other corps are allowed to copy Warlord setups but Camel isnt as sparring partners? Think that statement is really weird. Have any other teams that practiced against eachother been looked into about this? Hardly think so, but since its the winning team they arent allowed to, I see. Or is Nulli in the collusion as well now?! Everything you say and do here is just so PL could have a better chance next year and thats about it, you are so undermining everything, well played.


    lmao what? I think you've missed something. We never claimed to know exactly what they were doing (OK, Rive did, but in fairness he claims that he had a better idea for the wheel, so take his comments with a silo of salt). The reason that we (and I can say 'we' as I'm the official voice of the PL Tournament team) have said from the outset that they colluded is because we knew enough of the meta to recognize how small variations of a team would impact the matches, and when we saw it, it was obvious. Much like the trained weatherman that sees a thunderstorm in Africa and knows that it will become a hurricane in the Atlantic, our expert team could see the minor tweaks Hydra and Camel used as the true indicators that they were colluding. Sorry if you don't get it, it takes a trained eye.

    The Official Stance of PL on this is that we got outplayed by both Hydra and Camel, and that they out-performed us on the final day. However, if you think that they didn't have an advantage because they had to beat us in 50% of their matches against us or that we had to beat them in 66% of our matches against them, then... well, I've got some land I'd like to sell you.

  • The Moment you realize you're the bad guy in EVE Communication Center

    Grath Telkin wrote:
    I feel like you're all being trolled really hard.

    Spoken like a man that had nothing to do with the tourney other than being convinced by Hendrick to be in a commercial featuring a 3-year old joke.