EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2011-03-25 15:11
  • First Forum Visit: 2011-10-16 12:32
  • Number of Posts: 63
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 36

Shenra Twrin

Security Status -0.1
  • Republic Military School Member since
  • Minmatar Republic Faction

Last 20 Posts

  • C1 BC (non-drake) in EVE Gameplay Center

    Wolf/Jaguar

  • Why we need auto probing and more in EVE Communication Center

    Roi Hurutara wrote:
    Firstly please forgive my spelling and grammar as English is my second language. I have been playing EVE for about one month. Initially I was very interested in exploration but I gave up after tried it for some time. Here are my thoughts about probing:

    1. From gameplay perspective, probing is extremely boring. As a newbie explorer, i used spend hours probing for dozens of signals. Sometimes I find a good site or two, but most of time i am just repeating the same routine again and again for hours. It's even more boring than any thing i have done at work. Basically I feel like working rather than playing a game.

    2. Exploration can be fun, it's always exicting to find something random and new, knowing I am the only/first person who have found it. In this sense, WH is a great content for explorer, but it's too harsh for new players like me. Maybe CCP want to create some content that's available to everyone while don't want to make it too easy. But for me the probe draging and zooming has ruined the fun.

    3. On the PVP side, lack of quick probing is probably the main reason why we rely so much on local and star gate in finding a fight. D-scan is fine for me, it's meant to be a simple but crude method of space pinpointing. However, in a world where everyone flies shinny space ships, we are still finding targets by manually draging probes? That just feels weird.

    _____________________________________
    EDIT: if you feel it's too long, just read below:
    _____________________________________

    4. In a spaceship era, rather than some magical new technology, we still need 4 probes to find a target in 3d space--I can live with that, but it has to be done in a more intelligent way to be convicing. To avoid too much uncontrollable change to the game, why can't we just add an "auto probing" option, similar with "auto pilot" vs. "warp to 0m". "Auto probing" can use the exact same mechanism, but sightly slower or maybe with other restrictions. Everything applies to current probing still apply during auto probing except i can do something esle while it's scanning or just lay back and wait. Manual probing will still be an option, in case you are a real pro, or you want to use some tricks to make it much faster.

    5. Combat probing is not as useful as it should be. It's ok if your target isn't moving, but in real pvp no one's gonna sit there and wait for you to catch. We need a mechanism which can track and follow a target to indicate its approximate location once it is 100% pinpointed, so that you can probe it out again with minimal effort. It could be a new type of probe, a module that could be fitted to a dedicated ship. Deploying such tracker to cover possible target locations will make the vast space of EVE more meaningful strategically.

    In short, adding auto probing and "signal tracking" to current probing mechanism could make probing a lot easier and useful, and may solve the local problem.



    yeah dude great id... oh w8 NO! get ur ass up you lazy bum

  • Manufacturing in WH's. in EVE Gameplay Center

    i can you give somethhing to consider.


    Manuf... in a WH is ofc possible but why would u want do it?

    Your Pos can easy be reinforced, your Hauler can easily be ganked and to haul all that stuff is a nightmare. Syrsly you gain no advantage... or let me say only one.. You can Produce in secred nobody can know what you Prod..

    But dude its not worth it.....

    The ORE BELTS dont spawn frequent... everybody in wh looove to gank thos hulk/vengaces

    Wouldnt do it. if you do, respect for that level of masochism

  • sell WH C2 in EVE Marketplace

    totaly the right forum section for this, totaly not reported

  • Tengu HAMs or HMLs in EVE Gameplay Center

    Daniel Plain wrote:
    hams for C1 and C2, else HML

    this

  • Tengu HAMs or HMLs in EVE Gameplay Center

    search function dude... do you even used it once ?
    ON SITE 3 OF WH FORUM IT IS ... god.. thos lazy people in eve... give me cancer
    https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=188272&find=unread

  • Ideas for "Worm-hole" More Conflict...... in EVE Gameplay Center

    tgl3 wrote:
    Vincent Gaines wrote:
    Great. Now whenever I say wormhole I'm going to stretch it out.


    worm-hole
    worm-hole


    worm....hole.

    worm....
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    hole.

    Worm..........................
    ............................................................................................
    ............................................................................................
    ............................................................................................
    ............................................................................................
    ............................................................................................
    ............................................................................................
    ............................................................................................
    ..............................-Hole

    thats how u spell it right

  • Minmatar are going to become the crap, CCP wants retribution not balance in EVE Gameplay Center

    Flying Loki in PVP all day... no problems here

  • Eve Meme in EVE Communication Center

    http://s14.directupload.net/images/130127/apv7qyee.png

  • Cipreh for CSM8! Make our voices heard! [QUALIFIED] in Council of Stellar Management

    how much isk for my vote ?

  • CCP and their ISD are being hypocrite in EVE Communication Center

    i can see by the pixels of op´s post that op is an mad angry carebear who got scammed and can fliped!
    So let me ask you something!

    YOU MAD?

  • c5-c6 wh corps in EVE Gameplay Center

    psycho freak wrote:
    Yo

    ok so im looking for a c5-c6 wh corp main focus pvp but i will need to make isk for shiny also

    my question is to you wh dwellers are there any fck wit c5-c6 corps i should avoid

    thnx

    how about some propper english ?

  • Old school passwords in EVE Communication Center

    Skorpynekomimi wrote:
    Isn't this 'say if your passwords aren't alphanumeric so you can be an easier target for password-cracking bots'?


    I´m behind 24 letters, come at me bro.

  • HML or HAM after the missile nerf? in EVE Gameplay Center

    Rall Mekin wrote:
    I am currently deployed elsewhere in game, but I am running sites in a HAM tengu quite well. My tengu fit is basically:

    Low
    Ballistic Control System x4

    Mids
    Pith C-type small shield booster x2
    Caldari Navy Shield Boost Amplifier
    Republic Fleet 10mn Afterburner
    Em Ward Amplifier II
    Adaptive Invulnerability Field Ii

    High
    Heavy Assault Missile launcher II x6

    Rigs:
    I honestly cannot remember, but I think its currently three missile rigs designed to increase HAM Range. You could go three Cap/Shield oscillator rigs (the ones that speed up your Rep cycle).

    Subs:
    Tengu Offensive -- Accelerated Ejection Bay
    Tengu Propulsion -- Fuel Catalyst
    Tengu Electronics - CPU Efficiency Gate
    Tengu Defensive - Amplification Node
    Tengu Engineering - Augmented Capacitor Resevoir (for cap reserve)


    You tought right, with this fit you posted which is not even cap stable!, you wrote, you would put in cap rigs. If you would use 3x CCC (2xt2 1xt1) then you would have enough cap but, only 30km range against trolol webfrigs/cruisers (hfgl with 30km range) like you mentioned.

    2nd i doubt that 476 def (eft) is enough when i lived in c3 my tengu had about 1k def+ highcap(eft 1k is over tanked) and it costs nearly the same.

    3nd the dps is nice but like i said no range and some cruisers who web derp around 40km, with sleeper web on you no fun to shoot.


    I give you my fitting when i used to farm c3 (solo).

    [Tengu, Tengu C3 Solo ]
    Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
    Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
    Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
    Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System

    Pith B-Type Large Shield Booster
    'Copasetic' Particle Field Acceleration
    EM Ward Field II
    Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
    Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
    Cap Recharger II
    Cap Recharger II

    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile

    Medium Rocket Fuel Cache Partition I ( get launcher rigging on IV or you need an 1% cpu imp oder faction cap recharger)
    Medium Capacitor Control Circuit II
    Medium Capacitor Control Circuit II

    Tengu Defensive - Amplification Node
    Tengu Electronics - Obfuscation Manifold
    Tengu Propulsion - Fuel Catalyst
    Tengu Offensive - Accelerated Ejection Bay
    Tengu Engineering - Capacitor Regeneration Matrix


    Pro:
    Good Tank 932def (eft) enough to easy tank all combat sites in a c3
    High Cap stable at 58% (sleepers can´t neut you empty even if you perma on your booster)
    Enough Range to kill anything in a site without moving much ( 81,4km range, tengu only have max log range of 87.5km)
    Solid Dps/Dmg 565dps ( only 60 dps less than 6launcher tengu with same tank), and 300dps less than ham but u dont need to move to your target = you can shot more rockets = more real dmg are dealed
    Cheap! only about 1b-1,2b isk (fit +ship)


    Con:
    Slow ( Sometime you need to fly around a bit)
    No Problauncher on it, so you need and alt who can overview the system or you need to scan your wh frist and then use dscan like every sec (even this cant save you if you are in a combat site and they come with cloakys) but this is pretty much on all ships without problauncher the consequence.
    Needs Good Fitting and energys skills (you only have 10cpu grid left so u need imp if you dont have the skills or TRAIN ITPirate) but good cap skills are obligatory.


    All in all you cant be much more save with a tengu, the only fit which beats this fitting in matter of survival is the 100mn Tengu but even thos can be catched if people know what they do (hello web lokis and vigis ).

    my2cents

    sorry four bat englisch Big smile


    e/ found this fitting from Galenros from Frozen Dawn Academy
    [Drake, C3 solo]
    Shield Power Relay II
    Shield Power Relay II
    Shield Power Relay II
    Ballistic Control System II

    Shield Recharger II
    Shield Recharger II
    Large Shield Extender II
    Large Shield Extender II
    Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
    Adaptive Invulnerability Field II

    Core Probe Launcher I, Core Scanner Probe I
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile

    Medium Core Defense Field Purger I
    Medium Core Defense Field Purger I
    Medium Core Defense Field Purger I

    should also do it if your pocket is small, but sites will take long because of the low dmg but even if you get ganked... its a drake so what

  • armor-torp-navy-raven for whs? in EVE Gameplay Center

    Sushi Nardieu wrote:
    Fly ECM Tengu

    +1 the only thing you can use a tengu for

  • The change to the missiles in EVE Gameplay Center

    Acac Sunflyier wrote:
    I've been seriously debating to switching to faction missiles to compensate for the range nerf. What are your thoughts on the best new sleeper killer? (Note I was using furry before)



    why new best killer ?

    Dreads + webloki > all

  • Why do people use more than 4 probes while scanning? in EVE Communication Center

    Steve Ronuken wrote:
    Shenra Twrin wrote:
    Why people even do use Normal Core Scanners then Combats have the same Scanning strength ? .... not always use combats is dumb, u can scan everything out with combats if you got at least everything on IV



    http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Combat_Scanner_Probe_I 20
    http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Core_Scanner_Probe_I 40
    http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Sisters_Core_Scanner_Probe 44
    http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Sisters_Combat_Scanner_Probe 22


    Not the same strength. Combats have half the strength of Cores. (remember, when you look at the strength of loaded probes, all your bonuses apply)
    They also only go down to 0.5AU, rather than 0.25 AU, while having double the base deviation.


    like i said if you have IV+ scan skills u dont need 0.25 au u get everything on 0.5 :) also they have the same scan strength

    Jack Miton wrote:


    they have the same strength at the same range.
    i use cores myself for reasons.

    PS: you forgot rss cores


    what reasons ? really want to know.

  • Why do people use more than 4 probes while scanning? in EVE Communication Center

    Why people even do use Normal Core Scanners then Combats have the same Scanning strength ? .... not always use combats is dumb, u can scan everything out with combats if you got at least everything on IV

  • Well... I've hit the cliff... in EVE Communication Center

    Tiberius StarGazer wrote:


    I have a tank that lasts all of 30-40 seconds against pilots that have DPS far in excess of mine, pilots who can warp scram me from 25km, TWENTY FIVE ******* KM.



    Just for your information


    there is a Difference between Scrambler and DISTRUPOR

    SCRAMBLER : http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Warp_Scrambler_I
    A scrambler normaly works around 10km +/- 3-4km (overheat or factionstuff)

    IT GOT a Warp Scramble Strength (power of canceling your ship go into warp(standart power of a ship is 1) of 2-3 (depends on meta lvl) because there are some ships which have a higher warp strength or ships fittet with Warp Core Stabilizers
    http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Item_Database:Ship_Equipment:Propulsion_:Propulsion_Upgrades:Warp_Core_Stabilizers

    AND he can interdict your MWD module (Afterburnes still work) so u cant use it anymore

    Pro: high strenght + enemy can use mwd anymore aslong in range
    Con: NO RANGE

    Disruptor: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Warp_Disruptor_I
    IT got a warp ("""cancel""") strength 1

    and it have a HUGE range of 20km (t1) 25km (t2) 30km (faction) + boost and overhead easy 40-48km warp disruption ( you cant warp away)
    but you still can use MWD and AB ( so you can gtfo fast)


    Pros: HUGE ******* RANGE
    con : only Warp Scramble Strength of 1 and you still can use mwd BUT normaly you have fited a web or/and also a mwd or ab on it to keep in range or get in range.




    my 2cents for u

  • EVE play time compared to other MMORPGS , are we doing bad or good? in EVE Communication Center

    Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
    Half of those aren't even MMORPG's...LoL is an RTS, BF3 and Call of Doody are FPS and Diablo III is something else entirely.

    That being said...EVE has been out 10 times longer than all of those games. EVE probably isn't in that list because they could not realistically and accurately calculate the numbers. With THAT being said...EVE is probably not quite on that list.

    just to clear it up diablo3 is a Hack ´n Slay