EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2007-02-16 01:37
  • First Forum Visit: 2011-04-07 22:05
  • Number of Posts: 3,398
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 7,457

Weaselior

Security Status 0.4
  • GoonWaffe Member since
  • Goonswarm Federation Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • Dev blog: Researching, the Future in EVE Information Center

    Luke Erata wrote:
    I imagine some idiot out there who created hundreds of lvl 20 T1 ammo BPOs getting the aforementioned "tokens" and applying them to something much more costly. Sure time is time, but he did not have his capital tied up in a more expensive BPO while it was being researched.

    Again I am only offering a different idea, one opposing "time tokens", to the BPOs that are researched beyond lvl 10.

    yeah i too think its a good idea to spawn massive amounts of free bpos for idiots who spent ages on useless research

    gimme gimme gimme

  • Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! in EVE Information Center

    Frying Doom wrote:

    But they do not really communicate, we have not gotten to the point that for all intents and purposes they are now communicating with the representatives of less than 10% of their players. And why, because the CSM has proven its self to be a poor communicator of the actual players wishes and desires, as well as more often acting as a mouth piece for CCP and not the players it supposedly represents.

    Hell look at Malcanis, he went into the CSM to get 0.0s problems fixed but nothing can be done because of the road map and this is what the 4th different road map so far and they only ever seem to do up a new one when it has been shown they are failing at introducing the last one.

    There has been great dev interaction on all of these threads - there's been a ton of back and forth in the industry threads (which basically went into an understandable lull during fanfest), the isotope change got altered based on feedback within a day, and plenty more. A thread about new ships is going to take a little while for the really good feedback to start gelling and it's not at all surprising there's not more Rise posting yet - most of the thread is "neat! neat!".

  • Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs in EVE Gameplay Center

    Otti Ottig wrote:

    oh and how does "value will go down" and "we won't take them away, and screw you" make u think that they will be removed? -value of something not existent can't go down IRRC

    they won't just be deleted, they'll get some token reward: it just will assuredly not be "here is something worth ten years profit"

    i assume that the timetable on those getting murdered in their sleep was moved up after the issues they caused with the current change

  • [WTS] Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II BPO in EVE Marketplace

    *Snip* Please refrain from discussions in a WTS/WTB thread. ISD Ezwal.

  • WTS/WTB 30 T2 BPOs in EVE Marketplace

    *Snip* Please refrain from discussions in a WTS/WTB thread. ISD Ezwal.

  • Dev Blog: Delivering The Industry New Eden Deserves! in EVE Information Center

    LHA Tarawa wrote:

    PAhhhhhlase.

    The needs things that need tweaks are:
    Research overhaul (everything about it).
    Cost scaling based on solar system rather than facility usage.
    Teams that would have given a MASSIVE advantage to huge corps and crushed small corps.
    ME reductions for POS/Outpost.

    I'm referring to the issues that greyscale and the other devs have posted about thinking over and potentially needing to change, *Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.

  • Dev Blog: Delivering The Industry New Eden Deserves! in EVE Information Center

    CCP Fozzie wrote:
    Kenneth Feld wrote:
    Freighter and Jump Freighter rebalancing - Kinda industry, but also ship rabalancing...

    Kronos or Crius??


    Kronos. All of the previously announced ship and module balancing is still scheduled for Kronos.

    The one exception is the capital jump drive fuel use increase which is being delayed to Crius.

    When are the details on the freighter/dst thing getting posted?

  • WTS/WTB 30 T2 BPOs in EVE Marketplace

    *Snip* Please refrain from discussions in a WTS/WTB thread. ISD Ezwal.

  • Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs in EVE Gameplay Center

    here you all go:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTTyMhSKY9E

    skip to 22:20

    "i think we've been fairly consistently, publically of the opinion that we need to do something with t2 bpos for some time, I hope that's being taken into account in market prices..."

    "...that value is going to go down in the future..."

    good luck with the "this is all just a goonie lie" thing

  • [WTS] Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II BPO in EVE Marketplace

    *Snip* Please refrain from discussions in a WTS/WTB thread. ISD Ezwal.

  • closed in EVE Marketplace

    *Snip* Please refrain from discussions in a WTS/WTB thread. ISD Ezwal.

  • Dev Blog: Delivering The Industry New Eden Deserves! in EVE Information Center

    Glad to see that there will be time to tweak the things that have been mentioned as needing a bit of work. From memory, I think those are:

    1) POS - the new lowsec array and making the arrays have some sort of cost thingie
    2) Copying - Figuring out the correct formula and other tweeks needed (e.g. capital component bpc amounts increasing)_
    3) Correct application of these changes to t2 bpos

    Any others?

  • Dev Blog: Delivering The Industry New Eden Deserves! in EVE Information Center

    Seith Kali wrote:
    Quote:
    Moving the industry features to the Crius release on 22 July is an example of our new release model in action.


    Wouldn't that be to release the parts that are ready rather than pushing back a big bang release?

    Almost all of these parts are interlocking and you can't really deploy one without the others.

  • Thoughts on GOON Manipulation of T2 BPOs in EVE Gameplay Center

    Agata Matahari wrote:

    Wow, very qualified comment and such profound arguments. Seems you are pretty butthurt that 10 people seem to have t2 bpos and you don't. :D

    people who own t2 bpos are to be pitied for their low intellect not envied

    even people who simply inherited theirs or won them in the lottery rather than bought at these prices: if you saw 10 year profit prices on those, didn't realize it was a bubble and cash out immediately, boy howdy you're not the sharpest tool in the shed

  • Dev blog: Building better Worlds in EVE Information Center

    Seith Kali wrote:
    Can we get confirmation of the intended changes to outpost bonuses too? If they exist, I cannot find them. Perhaps in a thread like the starbase changes?

    cost devblog

  • Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! in EVE Information Center

    Mike Azariah wrote:
    This follows in the precedent set by Dolan. CSM is not to be a conduit of 'other information'. The minutes are not a sneak peek at what is coming next and a source for insider information. The election results are not a look at the CCP's current business success.

    We represent you but we do not spy for you.

    m

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but Dolan's philosophy led to a 40% drop in turnout so I think it should be pretty high on the list of things to reconsider.

  • [Kronos] Mordu's Legion in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Rek Seven wrote:

    I though we were done with this kind of confusing bonus? Why not give them less velocity bonus and do away with the flight penalty? It only matters for the first wave or missiles anyway.

    Among other reasons: faster missiles are harder to firewall.

  • [Kronos] Mordu's Legion in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Rowells wrote:
    Weaselior wrote:
    by 200% bonus, do you mean 3x or 2x?

    3x

    200% bonus is read as adding 200%

    I know what it means literally: I am unsure if CCP meant that (given the corresponding negative bonus) and mentally goofed thinking 200% meant 2x (so same range but quicker application).

  • [Kronos] Mordu's Legion in EVE Technology and Research Center

    by 200% bonus, do you mean 3x or 2x?

  • Dev Blog: CSM 9 Results! in EVE Information Center

    Malcanis wrote:
    Both.

    Interesting, will your CSM tag stay on posts made while you were a CSM and not on subsequent posts? It's still on the top post portrait but not this post.

Forum Signature

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.