EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2013-05-12 01:20
  • First Forum Visit: 2013-05-26 23:43
  • Number of Posts: 103
  • Bounty: 0 ISK
  • Likes Received: 109

exiik Shardani

Security Status 5.0
  • Imperial Spacedrill and Logistics Member since
  • Amarrian Volunteer Defence Alliance Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • Anomalies + tags idea in EVE Technology and Research Center

    are not in any active ratting system many MTU's in space?

    is not virtually no risk better option that just dumb account bounty plus operation in wallet?

  • Anomalies + tags idea in EVE Technology and Research Center

    how make more content/fun into null?

    forsaken & forlon hubs + havens + sanctums anomalies reduce bounty by 1/3 or 1/2 and when anomaly is finished there is spawn container with tags (these ESS tags )

    example
    haven -> now it's around 30m bounties
    haven->after it is 20m bounties and 10m worth tags

    Why that?
    + everyone can steal it
    + better loot in destroyed MTU's
    + more risk into null and for assets (small ISK sink)
    + you need haul it to hisec (like wh blue loot) so more content for some groups
    + probably very easy to code

  • [June] Nullsec Asteroid Cluster and Excavator Drone changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    when you nerf rorq mining ability by 30%

    so why do not you boost rorq mining boosting by 30% ? ... to boost subcaps around it?

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Tomoko Sunji wrote:


    obviously less, because most of the guys in eve are plebs that can't fit decently a ship unless it becomes mainstream and easy to play.


    orthrus TOP 5 zkill ship
    any HIC there? noBig smile

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Tomoko Sunji wrote:


    And they said orthrus was cancer hu.

    This **** is still gonna be ******* awesome post patch.



    just one thing. How often did you see that HIC in space and how often did you see orthrus?

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    well am I blind because I do not see a HIC in every roaming gang in providence? and there is no HIC at every gate :-(

    but tons of uncatchable interceptors, tons of Sabres (other bublers still exist?), tons of cloaky ships and Orthruses, Brutixes. I never heard anyone there to say anything wrong is with HIC's...

    tell my please why 37km scram on one expensive, HI skills and special ship is wrong, but unstopable interceptor can disrupt infinite time my VNI and my drones can kill him rarely (I have there 3x DNC, acolytes fly over 10k and still luckily hit that inty?) is fine?

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Mira Chieve wrote:


    Wait how are you going to get into scram range when I scram you at 40km?
    Even with a 20km scram you will not glide into scram range.
    A 1mn Svipul is still way too slow.

    Of course if the nerf happens then you should replace beams with pulses and the Devoter will not be such a strong solo ship anymore.

    But with a 40km scram? Ridiculous....


    where usual HIC tackle you?

    after gate jump so where is HIC? near gate. so what do you solve that? you burn to gate (12km) and check if HIC is in scram range, if not just easily jump back...


    39km warp disruptor is useless when most of others cruisers r faster. any solid kite ship can now easily tackle you even these null 4k+ m/s interceptor plague and you do nothing. HIC was only one ship which these tacklers try hold with high risk.

    after that change I get more fun with any command ship for same price and with better chance to survive

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Ugly Eric wrote:

    Wrong, look at the fit I posted above.

    Anyway, fact is that no ship should be uncounterable. Every ship, every module, every tactic should have a counter to it. Otherwise it will not be rock/paper/scissors


    pulse devoter is fine with web it can track, but beam cannot track at close range most of small things even with web.

    tbh is not better or more effective use deimos, vigiliant or orthrus? I think you do not undock anymore with that pulse devoter

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Mira Chieve wrote:


    Solo Beam Devoter is pretty strong. 40km scram and 500 dps at that range?
    Try tackling it with anything smaller than a HIC.
    AAR is plenty of tank, how much damage are you going to project and apply at 40km?

    But you have no clue. Calling HICs slow as fu.


    what about anything with neuts? or anything with AB? double prop 200ac svipul will troll you hard... or every frig can orbit you at 500 and you hit nothing...

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Ugly Eric wrote:
    one thing ppl seem to have missed completely is the usage of hics as a antitackle platform. Especially the onyx and the devoter. Those two ships have been practically untackleable with frigs heretills. When the devoter with pulses or a onyx with rapid lights gets tackled by a frig, the frig has not had the slightest chanche of survival, unless bunch of logi keeping them alive.

    Another point that has been almost completely dismissed here is the fact, that HIC's dont need to sacrifice anything else for the 40km scram, as it is a highslot module, whitch they all have a utility high for. Arazus, huginns etc. other controlplatforms all haveto sacrifice midslots for tackle. That has and will be a HUGE advantage for hics, even without 40km, but 21km scram.

    And pls stop saying RIP HIC's, as this change in my mind still keeps them as very valid ship, but not having a completely unfair advantage to them. 21km scram is still very powerfull tool. Not to forget their 40km disruptor.

    !


    well did you realize that HIC cannot get remote reps but frig in your example can? as well 2 times cheaper arazu can be remote rep...
    who care about 37km disruptor when any HIC is slow as fu... well as destroyer and everybody with little brain, mwd and small capacitor can manage easily escape...

    if you need nerf HIC, it is still better to let them have scram like 28km when faction 37km is so huge problem...

    btw. did you try fit devoter as solo combat ship? I think not... try fit it with heavy pulses and then speak about tank...

  • [March] Rorqual and Mining changes in EVE Technology and Research Center

    when you nerf yield for excavator drones why do not you a little boost yield from rorq boosts to other mining ships?

  • [March] Balance Tweaks: Focused Warp Scrambling Script in EVE Technology and Research Center

    omg why? HICs r pretty expensive and only chance how to point these annoying kite plague around and it is nerfed :-(

  • Nullification and Interdiction in EVE Technology and Research Center

    what about make one more functionality to entosis module? it can "entosis buble" and after some time buble it is unanchored and may be scooped <3

    and please do not forget about other mobile structures:

    i really do not like when some generate killmailsf( MTU, depot, cyno inhib...), and bubles NOT.... or some r expensive and decay after hour (cyno inhib) and some r cheap with no decay...

    make all mobile things clear with one rule (KM and decay)



    what about small tweak to smartbombs damage? if one smartbomb BS can destroy normally uncatchable interceptor, then nulli(infection) is not problem :-)

    or what about nullification module instead of direct ship role bonus?

  • [December] Excavator Mining Drone yield rebalance in EVE Technology and Research Center

    well so my ratting set up is:

    2,5b carrier with 150m bounty/hour (with align there is pretty low chance to catch me)
    100m afk VNI with 50-60m bounty/hour
    100m afk VNI with 50-60m bounty/hour

    =2,7b -> 11hours of ratting to replace it ! (and I do not count loot from MTUs)

    what about mining setup with 3x chars?
    2,4b rorq hull + 400m fit + 5x 1,2b excavators => 200m ore hour with siege (and no chance escape?)
    200m skiff with 20m ore/hour
    200m skiff with 20m ore/hour

    =9,2b -> 38hours of STATIC mining (and you even risk most of your compressed ore in cargo)


    Am I wrong with numbers? miners still have hard work....

  • Dev blog: Building Dreams: Introducing Engineering Complexes in EVE Information Center

    Can anyone tell me one reason why to build any EC?

    I see nothing. Prece of EC/rigs and all modules r way overpriced and is still far better build anything on pos or even stations, because so bad ROI....

  • Dev blog: Building Dreams: Introducing Engineering Complexes in EVE Information Center

    some systems are already a junkyard (full of Astrahuses) ...


    CCPlease Sotyo with Doomsday device (but with strongly reduced base damage). XL things should have these funny thingsSmile

  • CD keys becoming non-redeemable on Nov 15 in EVE Information Center

    Can I get reimburse my AURUMs from my Dust514 account to eve account? What?

  • Dev blog: Building Dreams: Introducing Engineering Complexes in EVE Information Center

    Tau Cabalander wrote:
    exiik Shardani wrote:
    Btw do we get structure armor plates or shield plates or hardeners or any other fitable defensive modules? any POS can be reinforce, any ship can be "hell tank" so it should be possible for structures as well (when they are fitable) Smile

    There are none, plus there are not enough slots.

    Example: Azbel (large)
    * High [4]: Two anti-subcapital launchers
    * Mid [3]: Warp Scrambler, Target Painter, Webifier
    * Low [2]: 2x Ballistic Control System
    * Service [5]: Manufacturing, Research, Invention, Reprocessing

    ... and the mids will cap-out after 17 minutes of continuous activation.

    Don't even think of fitting a market module, as that will nearly max the fitting, and alone uses as much fuel as a large tower (it's a citadel module, so no fuel reduction bonus).



    are not subcapital launchers and ballistic control just wasting of ISK's? 3x guardian in attack fleet and they mitigate all damage even on your fit Azbel. current large poses can be near to voley any logi, but not two structures subcap launchers...


    I pretty much like to have option to fit two hardeners or plates or capacitor power relay or so into low slots. because actual low slots are only worth when you fit anti-capital launchers.
    if I want be fun I just say "subcapital launchers has similar effect like festival launchers"Big smile

  • Dev blog: Building Dreams: Introducing Engineering Complexes in EVE Information Center

    Why Sotio does not have at least one tube for heavy fighters? Keepstar has 5, so when Sotio is 5x cheaper/vulnerable then there should be one tube for heavy fighters...


    Btw do we get structure armor plates or shield plates or hardeners or any other fitable defensive modules? any POS can be reinforce, any ship can be "hell tank" so it should be possible for structures as well (when they are fitable) Smile

  • Dev blog: Building Dreams: Introducing Engineering Complexes in EVE Information Center

    Obil Que wrote:
    Sgt Ocker wrote:
    Obil Que wrote:
    exiik Shardani wrote:
    rigs cost :-D lol

    XL T2 rigs needs more t2 salvage than is actually for sale on Jita and price (really titan cost for one rig)...



    CCPls why do add something what is almost impossible build and for price that has negative ROI... :-(


    Strangely, I would venture to guess that CCP has intimate knowledge of the amount of salvage tucked away in various hangers and personal inventory to know that what you see on the market in Jita is not representative of the actual salvage in the game. It is almost like people have been anticipating these rigs and all their counterparts and those yet to come for almost 1.5 years and collecting salvage for their own purposes...

    Many have been saving up T2 salvage - To build rigs people will buy, I don't believe there is any group has enough T2 salvage tucked away to start building T2 rigs for Citadels and EC's.
    If they have, it still doesn't help anyone who hasn't been stockpiling it for a couple of years.

    Can you honestly see someone fitting a 100bil+ rig to such an easily destroyed structure as an EC? One rig costs more than the entire structure.

    Just remembered, I had a friend living in a WH for a few years, he stockpiled all his T2 salvage, had a ton of the stuff (it was to be his titan fund). Thing is he hasn't played for over a year.,,. And, likely won't be back..


    I'm sure someone much smarter than I about supercap building in null can figure out the cost/benefit but a group with an XLEC is going to defend it. Doesn't matter how "easy" it is to kill if you can't kill it because of the defense fleet. If the rig gives a decent savings over a long period of time, people will make the investment just like they do with T2 BPOs, etc.


    some math

    XL T2 rig price 100b <- (but sisi say over 270b)
    you get 1% ME bonus <- (just for ship, you need other rig for ME for capital parts if I read it right)
    if titan price 100b <- (for easy math)
    you need build 100x titan to have 0 ISK bilance (0% ROI)

Forum Signature

sry for my English :-(