# Anti-Ganking needs to stop being Anti-Gank

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/anti-ganking-needs-to-stop-being-anti-gank/350136>\
**Category:** Crime & Punishment\
**Created:** [February 17, 2022, 12:38am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/anti-ganking-needs-to-stop-being-anti-gank/350136 "2022-02-17T00:38:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 84

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cilla\_Cybin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cilla_cybin/32/292206_2.png) [@Cilla\_Cybin](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cilla_Cybin)\
**Post date:** [February 21, 2022, 7:18pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/anti-ganking-needs-to-stop-being-anti-gank/350136/84 "2022-02-21T19:18:33Z")

</div>

> [@Io\_Koval](#):
>
> Your continuous need to invalidate my personal experince

Because it _is_ just your personal experience…yet my point was that the entire ‘AFK miners’ thing for James 315 and CODE originated from a _single incident_ that was James’s personal experience yet somehow he concluded that ‘all’ miners must somehow be AFK.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/anti-ganking-needs-to-stop-being-anti-gank/350136)._