# Any chance of station walking ever again?

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [August 27, 2018, 2:05pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095 "2018-08-27T14:05:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ArmyOfMe](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/armyofme/32/514222_2.png) [@ArmyOfMe](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/ArmyOfMe)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2018, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/81 "2018-10-21T20:09:39Z")

</div>

One can always hope.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zluq\_zabaa](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/zluq_zabaa/32/19011_2.png) [@zluq\_zabaa](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/zluq_zabaa)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2018, 9:07pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/82 "2018-10-21T21:07:11Z")

</div>

> [@Joia\_Crenca](#):
>
> The technology is very much there to make this happen, and it would add a new dimension to EVE gameplay at some point. “EVE is dying” has been repeated since 2003, but I’m thinking that 2018 may be a path to make that statement look more foolish than ever before. (As long as Pearl Abyss REALLY looks at CCP’s history and player history so that we don’t get another Incarna result. Part of why some folks unsubbed was because Incarna was burning out video cards)

As you mention it, I think this was exactly the reason it was good to get rid of the old WiS: it added nothing to EVE gameplay. Not only in the unfinished state it was, but there wasn’t even a plausible concept in the first place. Walking in Stations, sitting on the loo - who cares?

Now, if Nova was able to add meaningful depths to the “person”-level of gameplay and this would interface nicely with EVE, it could be good. Then, when it’s not merely walking inside these stations, but actually doing something fun, exciting and related to the multiverse of EVE Online - it could actually be pretty great. If not, meh.

“EVE is dying” was always used by those, who wanted to passive-aggressively beg for a fundamental change in gameplay. “The game should change in my favor or it will die” - that’s what the people actually say without saying it. If the desired change seems all too unlikely, there is usually some ominous “majority of players” being brought up. So far I agree with you.

On the other hand, maybe more a sidenote, it’s worth looking at “EVE is dying” as a possible qualitative rather than a quantitative statement. From the perspective of someone who doesn’t actually claim that the game itself will cease to exist, but that it will change in a way that it loses core features, there can be some truth to that. Wether in the specific case it’s bad or good, it’s something for everyone to decide on their own.

Just, in this context, it might be worth understanding to be careful what you wish for. People have been raging and begging for years to end wardecs and to buff or nerf a bunch of other stuff. While it may feel like a victory to have it finally done, the side-effects of any such fundamental intervention can bring even more hardship for those who hoped for more freedom.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr\_Epeen](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/mr_epeen/32/373308_2.png) [@Mr\_Epeen](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Mr_Epeen)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2018, 9:14pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/83 "2018-10-21T21:14:20Z")

</div>

> [@zluq\_zabaa](#):
>
> As you mention it, I think this was exactly the reason it was good to get rid of the old WiS: it added nothing to EVE gameplay

A valid point. But it was never developed into its potential, so we’ll never know what it could have been and if it would have added content ( As CCP originally envisioned).

In any case, as I said above, if it adds value to the game - financial, not gameplay - then it will be reintroduced. It doesn’t matter what you or I think.

Mr Epeen 🕶

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kieron\_VonDeux](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kieron_vondeux/32/38030_2.png) [@Kieron\_VonDeux](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kieron_VonDeux)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2018, 2:24am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/84 "2018-10-22T02:24:23Z")

</div>

I still think it would have been interesting to have multiple players controlling single ships, which WIS could have evolved into along with Captain’s quarters onboard ships in space, but as they said, that would have been a lot of work, if it could even been reasonably done.

As far as what that would add to the game? Probably mostly aesthetic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Salt\_Foambreaker](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salt_foambreaker/32/280119_2.png) [@Salt\_Foambreaker](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salt_Foambreaker)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2018, 2:30am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/85 "2018-10-22T02:30:48Z")

</div>

> [@Kieron\_VonDeux](#):
>
> I still think it would have been interesting to have multiple players controlling single ships

I agree, I always thought they could do cool things with that. “Crew” activities also could have been good mobile subgames.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nevyn\_Auscent](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/nevyn_auscent/32/255124_2.png) [@Nevyn\_Auscent](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Nevyn_Auscent)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2018, 2:33am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/86 "2018-10-22T02:33:06Z")

</div>

As mentioned before, I’d like to see WiS used for politics and espionage type actions. Multiple pilots one ship wouldn’t be WiS since we use pods.  
But it would make sense that we might have to go in person to grease palms and hack offline servers in areas where only capsuleers can get to. As part of an overall thing involving more npc meaning.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kieron\_VonDeux](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kieron_vondeux/32/38030_2.png) [@Kieron\_VonDeux](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kieron_VonDeux)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2018, 2:37am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/87 "2018-10-22T02:37:10Z")

</div>

> [@Nevyn\_Auscent](#):
>
> Multiple pilots one ship wouldn’t be WiS since we use pods.

Nothing wrong with having multiple pods on one ship.  
Or even a multiple person pod module.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nevyn\_Auscent](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/nevyn_auscent/32/255124_2.png) [@Nevyn\_Auscent](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Nevyn_Auscent)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2018, 3:00am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/88 "2018-10-22T03:00:00Z")

</div>

Yes… But we float inside the pods filled with goo with life support equipment plugged into us.  
Which means it wouldn’t be WiS. It would just be 4 eggs on the command deck instead of 1.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zluq\_zabaa](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/zluq_zabaa/32/19011_2.png) [@zluq\_zabaa](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/zluq_zabaa)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2018, 9:43am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/89 "2018-10-22T09:43:20Z")

</div>

> [@Mr\_Epeen](#):
>
> In any case, as I said above, if it adds value to the game - financial, not gameplay - then it will be reintroduced. It doesn’t matter what you or I think.

Yes, because it’s a precondition for a company who’d have to put tens of thousands of work hours into it. Although they can never really be sure of having the effort pay out, there has to be at least a realistic base for an optimistic prediction. The old WiS didn’t have that.

If it turns out that Nova gets an interface to EVE and those “sabotage missions” are successful, they could decide to build a bridge from within EVE towards that. If and only if, that’s years from now and possibly comes with fresh thoughts and isn’t going to be a mere reintroduction of WiS.

> [@Kieron\_VonDeux](#):
>
> Nothing wrong with having multiple pods on one ship.  
> Or even a multiple person pod module.

Might need an PG-18 area for that kind of action.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jennifer\_Austin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/jennifer_austin/32/321578_2.png) [@Jennifer\_Austin](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Jennifer_Austin)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 5:05am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/90 "2018-12-31T05:05:35Z")

</div>

I think that if they would integrate like bars Apartments things like that into it and make it more like a game such as second life because it can make them money but other than that I don’t see walking in stations ever coming back because it doesn’t make any sense what would be nice would be able to see like PlanetSide Landing where you can land on planet and actually mine manually would like a drill or whatever that would be pretty cool I could see walking becoming a thing then

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cypherous](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cypherous/32/499883_2.png) [@Cypherous](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cypherous)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 9:08am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/91 "2018-12-31T09:08:32Z")

</div>

> [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
>
> I don’t know where you’re from but where I live there’s a fire code for each room within a public building that set’s a population cap on how many people can be inside.
> 
> I’m sure the same aspect could be applied to WiS, basically making each room a separate server with it’s own population cap. If a specific room get’s filled up, you can either go to another room or wait in line, just like you do in real life when trying to get into a top name venue on Friday night.
> 
> Other mmo games have multiple avatar interaction within them, how do you think they accomplish it?

The problem being that this would in turn require yet more hardware, don’t expect the current system to be able to handle spinning up over 100 instances of walking in stations per hub not to mention all the random extra instances where someone is walking around in a station with no players, most other MMO’s also have entirely instanced servers to begin with, when your server itself has a population cap of 1000 its much easier to then break that down in to smaller instances, there is no hard cap for the number of people TQ will accept and WiS instances would need to be hosted on separate yet linked nodes, and that starts to create a whole mess of issues, EVE is not like any other MMO out there in terms of how it handles its instances, at this point i’m sure jita alone beats entire server populations in some MMO’s and its certainly far more than any other MMO manages in a single “area”

WiS is a tech debt that CCP really don’t want for how few people would actually use it, i don’t really care how many crappy minigames it has its only ever going to get in the way for me so i would never use it, and i am pretty sure i am not the only person

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cypherous](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cypherous/32/499883_2.png) [@Cypherous](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cypherous)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 9:10am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/92 "2018-12-31T09:10:38Z")

</div>

> [@Kieron\_VonDeux](#):
>
> Nothing wrong with having multiple pods on one ship.

You mean apart from the fact that the game engine literally freaks out when 2 pilots occupy the same entity? 😛

Its been discussed in the past and basically labelled as impossible without entirely rewriting portions of the game which isn’t going to happen for such a niche feature

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nana\_Skalski](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/nana_skalski/32/489985_2.png) [@Nana\_Skalski](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Nana_Skalski)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 9:32am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/93 "2018-12-31T09:32:21Z")

</div>

> [@Cypherous](#):
>
> game engine literally freaks out when 2 pilots occupy the same entity

What about structures?

Certainly everything can be coded in, just people who would do that have to be hired and paid, and money not wasted on some other projects. If DUST 514 and WoD and Valkyrie would not happen, we would play EVE that would put Star Citizen to shame, and it would be a lot more optimized and running on low end level PCs very well. 😏

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeMichael\_Crimson](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/demichael_crimson/32/514115_2.png) [@DeMichael\_Crimson](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/DeMichael_Crimson)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 9:51am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/94 "2018-12-31T09:51:48Z")

</div>

I’m not even going to bother responding to the other stuff you wrote, but this is pure BS:

> [@Cypherous](#):
>
> WiS is a tech debt that CCP really don’t want for how few people would actually use it, i don’t really care how many crappy minigames it has its only ever going to get in the way for me so i would never use it, and i am pretty sure i am not the only person

It had massive potential to be more than just a bunch of glorified mini-games. At the time when it was first previewed up to the point of release and even afterwards, there were lot’s of players ready and waiting for it. What caused it to become abandoned and DOA was CCP listening to a small vocal minority group screaming the same bullcrap as you are now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Foggy\_Bernstein](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/foggy_bernstein/32/407887_2.png) [@Foggy\_Bernstein](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Foggy_Bernstein)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 10:09am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/95 "2018-12-31T10:09:08Z")

</div>

> [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
>
> there were lot’s of players ready and waiting for it.

I remember when it first previewed as Ambulation ( I believe), there was more than lots of players excited for what CCP was selling as the future. It was a clear majority of the player base.

Then CCP introduced walking in room and ■■■■■■ up any chance of acceptance for it.

Still, the code is still there so it won’t be long before we see it in game again. Korean game companies are incapable of not having pert and bouncy little hotties in their games.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cypherous](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cypherous/32/499883_2.png) [@Cypherous](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cypherous)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 10:45am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/96 "2018-12-31T10:45:52Z")

</div>

> [@Nana\_Skalski](#):
>
> > [@Cypherous](#):
> >
> > game engine literally freaks out when 2 pilots occupy the same entity
> 
> What about structures?
> 
> Certainly everything can be coded in, just people who would do that have to be hired and paid, and money not wasted on some other projects. If DUST 514 and WoD and Valkyrie would not happen, we would play EVE that would put Star Citizen to shame, and it would be a lot more optimized and running on low end level PCs very well. 😏

When you dock in a station you don’t exist within an entity, 2 people can’t be in control of a citadel etc, and no not everything “can” be coded in, the engine just doesn’t support having 2 people in the same entity at the same time

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cypherous](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cypherous/32/499883_2.png) [@Cypherous](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cypherous)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 10:50am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/97 "2018-12-31T10:50:00Z")

</div>

> [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
>
> I’m not even going to bother responding to the other stuff you wrote, but this is pure BS:
> 
> > [@Cypherous](#):
> >
> > WiS is a tech debt that CCP really don’t want for how few people would actually use it, i don’t really care how many crappy minigames it has its only ever going to get in the way for me so i would never use it, and i am pretty sure i am not the only person
> 
> It had massive potential to be more than just a bunch of glorified mini-games. At the time when it was first previewed up to the point of release and even afterwards, there were lot’s of players ready and waiting for it. What caused it to become abandoned and DOA was CCP listening to a small vocal minority group screaming the same bullcrap as you are now.

It will always just be a series of minigames, i don’t see any way in which WiS would actually improve the experience or provide something that actually makes it worth using, everyday activities like buying and fitting ships would take longer, talking to agents would take longer, you might call it “bullcrap” but i’ve yet to see anyone actually suggest a feature that would add something to the game that was meaningful, i mean you’re welcome to try but when you actually look at it all it does is slow down EVE

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yiole\_Gionglao](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/yiole_gionglao/32/374866_2.png) [@Yiole\_Gionglao](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Yiole_Gionglao)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 12:32pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/98 "2018-12-31T12:32:57Z")

</div>

Concerning the WiS train, the train is gone, the line was shut down, then the tracks rusted, then they were sold for scrap metal, the station burned, was demolished and then a giant crater was digged on top of it to build a skyscrapper but the project was abandoned, and now the crater that used to be a railway station that used to have a track where a train called WiS once passed is just a hole filled with muddy water. So no, it’s not going to happen. EVE will die without WiS.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nevyn\_Auscent](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/nevyn_auscent/32/255124_2.png) [@Nevyn\_Auscent](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Nevyn_Auscent)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 12:34pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/99 "2018-12-31T12:34:36Z")

</div>

Political or espionage actions. Lobbying npc corps for any npc space including pirate null. Espionage actions for sending covert squads to do things. (future idea for Intel gathering which could be grey rather than black and white like current intel, would require some current Intel to vanish also)  
Both are actions it makes sense to have to go in person to talk to the people as comms can both be faked and be less secure.  
And you could introduce some elements of risk into it without it being a FPS gameplay. Dialogue choices and random events aka rpg games often manage this.

So it’s entirely possible to introduce new meaningful but not compulsory gameplay with it.

@Foggy_Bernstein The code does not exist. It was based on a licensed middleware product they can no longer use, that was also limited to 32 bit apps. So it would need recreating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jonah\_Gravenstein](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/jonah_gravenstein/32/386819_2.png) [@Jonah\_Gravenstein](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Jonah_Gravenstein)\
**Post date:** [December 31, 2018, 1:26pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095/100 "2018-12-31T13:26:01Z")

</div>

> [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
>
> What caused it to become abandoned and DOA was CCP listening to a small vocal minority group screaming the same bullcrap as you are now.

Utter bollocks.

WiS was stillborn because CCP promised the earth and then failed to deliver, as paying customers we were right to ■■■■■ about it, and the 18 months of no development of the game that preceded it.

It suffered from rushed development, zero gameplay, poor attitude from management, failure to address player concerns over microtransactions, poor tech implementation that fried hardware, not giving the option to opt out of the dingy by the hour hotel room experience, etc, etc.

If CCP had lived up to what they promised, we wouldn’t have kicked off as much as we did.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/any-chance-of-station-walking-ever-again/101095.md?page=6)
