# Banning repeated gankers from highsec **URL:** \ **Category:** Crime & Punishment\ **Created:** [March 7, 2018, 8:20am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576 "2018-03-07T08:20:25Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 16
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 7:20pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/305 "2018-04-06T19:20:14Z")
Seriously, at times it seems you have trouble understanding simple sentences and you try to tell me you know more about science than I do šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚ ---
**Author:** ![Salvos\_Rhoska](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salvos_rhoska/32/14128_2.png) [@Salvos\_Rhoska](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salvos_Rhoska)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 7:22pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/306 "2018-04-06T19:22:08Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > Seriously, at times it seems you have trouble understanding simple sentences and you try to tell me you know more about science than I do Thatā€™s a very weak answer that also avoided what I asked. I answered your questions, but you avoid mine. PS: Yes, Iā€™m certain I understand the scientific method better than you do. You dont even know the difference between 1 and 1.499. ---
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 7:27pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/307 "2018-04-06T19:27:51Z")
> [@Salvos\_Rhoska](#): > > Surely you and I can both agree, that it would not be a bad thing if CCP ran another, better, and wider study on player attrition (suicide ganking being just one factor in that)? It would be just a waste of time really since we all know what the result would be: More denial from the same people who disregard the last study. Or what are you expecting? That everything will turn on its head after 15 daysā€¦ There are other statistics conducted by players based on killboards and they donā€™t show any difference at least from that perspective be that for 15 or 90 days. So donā€™t get your hopes up. This is all just a waste of timeā€¦ ---
**Author:** ![Ag3nt\_Jita](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ag3nt_jita/32/48115_2.png) [@Ag3nt\_Jita](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ag3nt_Jita)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 7:29pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/308 "2018-04-06T19:29:45Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > This is all just a waste of timeā€¦ Agreed mr wreck We should focus on important questions, such as 1+1? ---
**Author:** ![Salvos\_Rhoska](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salvos_rhoska/32/14128_2.png) [@Salvos\_Rhoska](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salvos_Rhoska)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 7:29pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/309 "2018-04-06T19:29:56Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > Or what are you expecting? I expect more, better, wider data on player attrition. What are you expecting? > [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > There are other statistics conducted by players How does one conduct statistics? Man, I told you above, you donā€™t understand/know the scientific method. You donā€™t understand even the basic terminology, let alone why it is defined as such. ---
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 7:53pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/310 "2018-04-06T19:53:29Z")
> [@Ag3nt\_Jita](#): > > We should focus on important questions, such as 1+1? Here, just for you: [Uncertainty - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty#Measurements) > For example, applying 10 ā€‹1ā„2 meters in a scientific or engineering application, it could be written 10.5 m or 10.50 m, by convention meaning accurate to within one tenth of a meter, or one hundredth. The precision is symmetric around the last digit. In this case itā€™s half a tenth up and half a tenth down, so 10.5 means between 10.45 and 10.55. Thus it is understood that 10.5 means 10.5Ā±0.05, and 10.50 means 10.50Ā±0.005, also written 10.50(5) and 10.500(5) respectively. Which means that 1+1=3 for large valued of 1 simple I know people react strongly if they are shown they donā€™t understand something they assumed to be clear. Thatā€™s ok. You will survive it. ---
**Author:** ![Salvos\_Rhoska](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salvos_rhoska/32/14128_2.png) [@Salvos\_Rhoska](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salvos_Rhoska)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 7:57pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/311 "2018-04-06T19:57:04Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > I know people react strongly if they are shown they donā€™t understand something they assumed to be clear. Oh man, this is hilarious. You are so uneducated in these matters its funny as hell. You really donā€™t get how badly you have misunderstood what you quoted, do you. ---
**Author:** ![Ag3nt\_Jita](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ag3nt_jita/32/48115_2.png) [@Ag3nt\_Jita](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ag3nt_Jita)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:00pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/312 "2018-04-06T20:00:51Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > Which means that 1+1=3 for large valued of 1 Value of 1 is 1 Please do not continue ---
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:01pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/313 "2018-04-06T20:01:04Z")
> [@Salvos\_Rhoska](#): > > I expect more, better, wider data on player attrition. > > What are you expecting? I expect you to disregard the study because you donā€™t like the outcome. You know like you do with the current one. ---
**Author:** ![Ag3nt\_Jita](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ag3nt_jita/32/48115_2.png) [@Ag3nt\_Jita](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ag3nt_Jita)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:03pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/314 "2018-04-06T20:03:51Z")
One catalyst plus one catalyst is three catalyst. ---
**Author:** ![Salvos\_Rhoska](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salvos_rhoska/32/14128_2.png) [@Salvos\_Rhoska](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salvos_Rhoska)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:05pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/315 "2018-04-06T20:05:49Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > I expect you to disregard the study because you donā€™t like the outcome. You know like you do with the current one. Again, you still donā€™t understand how/why the initial "study, was flawed, especially towards the conclusions YOU drew from it, and how far you tried to extend them. In your mind, 1+1=3. Thatā€™s says it all of your capacity to understand what a study is, what its results are, and why a wider, better study would be a good thing, What are you afraid of? Would it not be a good thing if CCP ran a wider, better study on player attrition? ---
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:07pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/316 "2018-04-06T20:07:04Z")
> [@Ag3nt\_Jita](#): > > Value of 1 is 1 As I mentioned there is a scientific notation where 1 means 1 +/- 0.5 so the value of 1 is between 0.5 and 1.5. I know, it is really really hard šŸ˜‚ ---
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:07pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/317 "2018-04-06T20:07:54Z")
forget it, we already had that. there is no reason to do this again. You are hopeless ---
**Author:** ![Salvos\_Rhoska](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salvos_rhoska/32/14128_2.png) [@Salvos\_Rhoska](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salvos_Rhoska)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:08pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/318 "2018-04-06T20:08:42Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > As I mentioned there is a scientific notation where 1 means 1 +/- 0.5 so the value of 1 is between 0.5 and 1.5. Oh godā€¦ Pleaseā€¦ Stop. You are confusing rounding and margins of error, with ā€œscientific notationā€. ---
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/319 "2018-04-06T20:09:56Z")
:facepalm: ---
**Author:** ![Salvos\_Rhoska](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salvos_rhoska/32/14128_2.png) [@Salvos\_Rhoska](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salvos_Rhoska)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:10pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/320 "2018-04-06T20:10:50Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > :facepalm: Yes, face palm. You have no idea what you are talking about, ---
**Author:** ![Ag3nt\_Jita](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ag3nt_jita/32/48115_2.png) [@Ag3nt\_Jita](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ag3nt_Jita)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:11pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/321 "2018-04-06T20:11:12Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > As I mentioned there is a scientific notation where 1 means 1 +/- 0.5 so the value of 1 is between 0.5 and 1.5. > > I know, it is really really hard šŸ˜‚ No. Value of 1 is always 1. ---
**Author:** ![Ima\_Wreckyou](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ima_wreckyou/32/235531_2.png) [@Ima\_Wreckyou](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ima_Wreckyou)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:12pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/322 "2018-04-06T20:12:15Z")
This triggers you really hard yes? ---
**Author:** ![Ag3nt\_Jita](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ag3nt_jita/32/48115_2.png) [@Ag3nt\_Jita](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ag3nt_Jita)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:12pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/323 "2018-04-06T20:12:47Z")
I am trying to help you. ---
**Author:** ![Salvos\_Rhoska](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/salvos_rhoska/32/14128_2.png) [@Salvos\_Rhoska](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Salvos_Rhoska)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 8:13pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576/324 "2018-04-06T20:13:29Z")
> [@Ima\_Wreckyou](#): > > This triggers you really hard yes? No, just shows you have no idea what you are talking about. I told you above, you are way out of your depth on this. Inb4 ā€œI was only pretending to be retardedā€ Own your crap. Ive been wrong many times, but I own it. [Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576.md?page=15) [Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/banning-repeated-gankers-from-highsec/61576.md?page=17)