# CCP plans to remove PvP from HS

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [December 27, 2020, 8:32pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184 "2020-12-27T20:32:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wadiest\_Yong](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/wadiest_yong/32/426921_2.png) [@Wadiest\_Yong](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Wadiest_Yong)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:21pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/670 "2021-03-13T17:21:45Z")

</div>

> [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](#):
>
> When you perform an experiment, you collect data, which must be analysed with statistical methods.

Plenty of statistical studies out there, based on sampling based on a hypothesis without a shred of experiment. The conclusions there are inferior to the ones based on experiment+data analysis/statistics. Causality is an elusive beasty, requires effort.  
Reproducibility is not a proof for the conclusion, but of the reliability of the experimental protocol used, the data obtained and the data analysis performed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fale\_Einn](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/fale_einn/32/477432_2.png) [@Fale\_Einn](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Fale_Einn)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:33pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/671 "2021-03-13T17:33:08Z")

</div>

I’m confused (and very tired which isn’t helping), are you suggesting having to earn your way out of highsec?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kadia_kakki_sotken/32/261190_2.png) [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kadia_Kakki_Sotken)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:34pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/672 "2021-03-13T17:34:15Z")

</div>

> [@Wadiest\_Yong](#):
>
> Plenty of statistical studies out there, based on sampling based on a hypothesis without a shred of experiment. The conclusions there are inferior to the ones based on experiment+data analysis/statistics. Causality is an elusive beasty, requires effort.  
> Reproducibility is not a proof for the conclusion, but of the reliability of the experimental protocol used, the data obtained and the data analysis performed.

Not to be rude, but I’m not sure what point you are making so I don’t know how to respond.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wadiest\_Yong](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/wadiest_yong/32/426921_2.png) [@Wadiest\_Yong](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Wadiest_Yong)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:39pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/673 "2021-03-13T17:39:14Z")

</div>

You state that “statistical evidence” is enough. I share @Anderson_Geten 's view that it isn’t, and I explained why.  
You also seem to be under the impression that reproducibility would be some kind of proof. It isn’t, as I pointed out, it is a check on the reliability of the way the data are produced, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anderson\_Geten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/anderson_geten/32/390041_2.png) [@Anderson\_Geten](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Anderson_Geten)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:39pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/674 "2021-03-13T17:39:36Z")

</div>

Better explanations than those I could provide.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kadia_kakki_sotken/32/261190_2.png) [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kadia_Kakki_Sotken)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:42pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/675 "2021-03-13T17:42:29Z")

</div>

> [@Wadiest\_Yong](#):
>
> You state that “statistical evidence” is enough. I share @Anderson_Geten 's view that it isn’t, and I explained why.

How would you define the proof that the higgs boson is real, if it is not statistical proof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anderson\_Geten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/anderson_geten/32/390041_2.png) [@Anderson\_Geten](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Anderson_Geten)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:43pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/676 "2021-03-13T17:43:48Z")

</div>

if you want to bring a counter argument, please bring a counter argument that makes sense.  
Here your sentence makes none.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kadia_kakki_sotken/32/261190_2.png) [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kadia_Kakki_Sotken)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:45pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/677 "2021-03-13T17:45:54Z")

</div>

Yes I’m having to mix up terminology because you have lead us down this road. I quite clearly stated there is no such thing as 100% certainty unless it is a mathematical proof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fale\_Einn](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/fale_einn/32/477432_2.png) [@Fale\_Einn](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Fale_Einn)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:46pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/678 "2021-03-13T17:46:44Z")

</div>

> [@Noori\_Naarian](#):
>
> but them being in low sec really is best for the game

I don’t agree with that, despite getting killed all the time. I don’t want to be ganked, but I do want to manage to survive the attempt, maybe even kill them back no mater where they are.  
Ganking is, to me, a big part of what makes Eve intense, and I’m not a ganker, or even close to being good at PvP. If Eve stops giving me a heart attack I’m going to like it a lot less.  
My attitude about PvP in highsec it a polar opposite, I want to be able to fly in a fleet and protect my fleet mates when they are attacked, I want to be able to attack stations even though I can’t make one of my own and wouldn’t even if I could, I want to be able to help miners when they get pounced on, and I want limited engagements unlimited. Concord is absurd and the mechanics of them are preposterous, if people could ask others to escort them for example when hauling expensive stuff, or corporations or fleets could seek revenge it would be a huge improvement. But no. If my fleet mate is being shot and I try to help Concord comes and kills me. This, at least to me, is inane.  
It’s also a serious ■■■■■ to explain to new people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anderson\_Geten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/anderson_geten/32/390041_2.png) [@Anderson\_Geten](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Anderson_Geten)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:48pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/679 "2021-03-13T17:48:57Z")

</div>

> [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](#):
>
> Yes I’m having to mix up terminology

No you don’t “have to” bring physics modeling when the topic is causality and statistical analysis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anderson\_Geten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/anderson_geten/32/390041_2.png) [@Anderson\_Geten](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Anderson_Geten)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:51pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/680 "2021-03-13T17:51:08Z")

</div>

> [@Fale\_Einn](#):
>
> But no. If my fleet mate is being shot and I try to help Concord comes and kills me. This, at least to me, is inane.

if they are at war and you are not at war with them, that is **expected**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wadiest\_Yong](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/wadiest_yong/32/426921_2.png) [@Wadiest\_Yong](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Wadiest_Yong)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:53pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/681 "2021-03-13T17:53:01Z")

</div>

I’m not a nuclear physics expert, and know next to nothing about the Higgs boson. From afar it looks similar to the situation in early 20th century when the neutron was postulated, indirectly proven but never actually “captured” unless by its footprint (until Chadwick did the right experiment). But, the bottom line is still that it is based on repeatable, verifiable experiments. It’s not, say, like a conclusion based on sampling the human population and making a correlation between the prevalence of certain infant diseases and exposure of a pregnant mother to certain food dyes - ethically undoable to experiment. In the latter case there might be a correlation, a strong suspicion, but never hard proof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kadia_kakki_sotken/32/261190_2.png) [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kadia_Kakki_Sotken)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:53pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/682 "2021-03-13T17:53:03Z")

</div>

> [@Anderson\_Geten](#):
>
> No you don’t “have to” bring physics modeling when the topic is causality and statistical analysis.

It’s completely relevant to the discussion. The field of physics is entirely based on finding causality and statistical analyses. It’s a real life example. What could be more relevant than that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kadia_kakki_sotken/32/261190_2.png) [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kadia_Kakki_Sotken)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:54pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/683 "2021-03-13T17:54:52Z")

</div>

> [@Wadiest\_Yong](#):
>
> I’m not a nuclear physics expert, and know next to nothing about the Higgs boson. From afar it looks similar to the situation in early 20th century when the neutron was postulated, indirectly proven but never actually “captured” unless by its footprint (until Chadwick did the right experiment). But, the bottom line is still that it is based on repeatable, verifiable experiments. It’s not, say, like a conclusion based on sampling the human population and making a correlation between the prevalence of certain infant diseases and exposure of a pregnant mother to certain food dyes - ethically undoable to experiment. In the latter case there might be a correlation, a strong suspicion, but never hard proof.

> [@Wadiest\_Yong](#):
>
> a strong suspicion, but never hard proof.

This is also true in the former case. That’s my point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fale\_Einn](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/fale_einn/32/477432_2.png) [@Fale\_Einn](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Fale_Einn)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 5:55pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/684 "2021-03-13T17:55:23Z")

</div>

I know, but I think it’s silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wadiest\_Yong](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/wadiest_yong/32/426921_2.png) [@Wadiest\_Yong](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Wadiest_Yong)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 6:00pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/685 "2021-03-13T18:00:06Z")

</div>

Well, look at it this way. Newton was right until Einstein said “erm, nope, there’s something more to this gravity. It’s actually space curvature”. Science keeps refining its working hypotheses. One theory leads to another, better able to include elusive phenomena in its predictions. Simple statistics never achieve that. Experiments do, even theoretical ones that eventually lead to physical ones that give further evidence of the existence of the higgs boson.  
Your point is wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kadia_kakki_sotken/32/261190_2.png) [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kadia_Kakki_Sotken)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 6:04pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/686 "2021-03-13T18:04:17Z")

</div>

Experiment and statistical analyses are coupled. Experiments are meaningless without analysis of the results and analysis can’t be done if there is no data collected by experiment (sampling is a form of experiment).

> [@Wadiest\_Yong](#):
>
> Your point is wrong.

You are wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wadiest\_Yong](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/wadiest_yong/32/426921_2.png) [@Wadiest\_Yong](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Wadiest_Yong)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 6:07pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/687 "2021-03-13T18:07:06Z")

</div>

You missed the point. I never stated there was no need for statistical analysis on experimental data. I did say that statistical analysis on data not obtained via experiment leads to inferior conclusions.

And as a segue, removing pvp from hs would be a mistake 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kadia_kakki_sotken/32/261190_2.png) [@Kadia\_Kakki\_Sotken](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kadia_Kakki_Sotken)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 6:10pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/688 "2021-03-13T18:10:13Z")

</div>

> [@Wadiest\_Yong](#):
>
> I did say that statistical analysis on data not obtained via experiment leads to inferior conclusions.

I certainly wasn’t arguing otherwise. I said conclusions are strengthened based on the amount of data and knowledge available which agrees with them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wadiest\_Yong](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/wadiest_yong/32/426921_2.png) [@Wadiest\_Yong](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Wadiest_Yong)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2021, 6:17pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184/689 "2021-03-13T18:17:47Z")

</div>

Right, if the data is based on Experiment. If not, it will remain a “working hypothesis”, which only means something to the researcher involved, and “believers”.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184.md?page=31)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-plans-to-remove-pvp-from-hs/287184.md?page=33)
