# CCP rules discussion on ganking and CONCORD mechanics - 2021.11.06

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Tags:** high-sec, low-sec, pvp\
**Created:** [November 6, 2021, 9:33am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527 "2021-11-06T09:33:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Daichi\_Yamato](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/daichi_yamato/32/252995_2.png) [@Daichi\_Yamato](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Daichi_Yamato)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 5:50pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/144 "2021-11-06T17:50:30Z")

</div>

![is-it-over-5a9aeb](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/0/6/6/06622da69d8df58eb5fe91ba52cc02ef1b42f22e.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zaera\_Keena](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/zaera_keena/32/449938_2.png) [@Zaera\_Keena](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Zaera_Keena)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 6:03pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/145 "2021-11-06T18:03:36Z")

</div>

You do know that you you don’t need to login to the game to post, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zaera\_Keena](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/zaera_keena/32/449938_2.png) [@Zaera\_Keena](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Zaera_Keena)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 6:08pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/146 "2021-11-06T18:08:21Z")

</div>

Worhtless? Tried gate camping in a frigate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zaera\_Keena](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/zaera_keena/32/449938_2.png) [@Zaera\_Keena](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Zaera_Keena)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 6:19pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/147 "2021-11-06T18:19:08Z")

</div>

Lore is evolving. You could say that The Fluffy Bear God who had kept himself hidden since time began in 2003, heard his follower’s cries, tasted their tears , put his playstation aside and zapped with lightning anyone who dared to pop his follower’s shiny toys before supplying Princess Aiko, the true saviour of highsec with more catalysts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zoiie](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/zoiie/32/292363_2.png) [@Zoiie](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Zoiie)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 6:45pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/148 "2021-11-06T18:45:40Z")

</div>

Perhaps forums should be for active Omega accounts only?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Etch\_Masuka](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/etch_masuka/32/468743_2.png) [@Etch\_Masuka](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Etch_Masuka)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 6:54pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/149 "2021-11-06T18:54:30Z")

</div>

because this place isn’t elitist and exclusionary enough already 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aiko\_Danuja](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/aiko_danuja/32/481237_2.png) [@Aiko\_Danuja](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Aiko_Danuja)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 6:56pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/150 "2021-11-06T18:56:34Z")

</div>

> [@Zoiie](#):
>
> Perhaps forums should be for active Omega accounts only?

This would definitely improve the quality of posting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ramona\_McCandless](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ramona_mccandless/32/468438_2.png) [@Ramona\_McCandless](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ramona_McCandless)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 7:39pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/151 "2021-11-06T19:39:46Z")

</div>

Hmm fair, newer forum sock puppets at the very least.

There’s been a good few of _those_ in the last few months.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ramona\_McCandless](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ramona_mccandless/32/468438_2.png) [@Ramona\_McCandless](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ramona_McCandless)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 7:40pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/152 "2021-11-06T19:40:57Z")

</div>

Without question yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Argath\_Stormbringer](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/argath_stormbringer/32/295223_2.png) [@Argath\_Stormbringer](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Argath_Stormbringer)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 9:10pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/153 "2021-11-06T21:10:00Z")

</div>

> [@Jim\_Halescott](#):
>
> Incorrect  
> There is not “only one spawn per system”  
> There are as many as there are illegal activities that happen simultaneously
> 
> Example:  
> Toon A does an illegal thing in Asteroid Belt 1, at the EXACTLY same time, as Toon B does an illegal thing in Asteroid Belt 2  
> Both will have CONCORD arrive at the same time, and both will be different CONCORD entities

Does this mean that if I attack an another player at my abyssal running spot, then Concord will spawn there and the gankers can’t move them off, as the spawn follows me?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aaaarrgg](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/aaaarrgg/32/395089_2.png) [@Aaaarrgg](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Aaaarrgg)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 9:13pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/154 "2021-11-06T21:13:13Z")

</div>

one spawn of 3 concord will appear at the site of the attack for each ganker that shoots at the same time, they sit in that spot untill downtime or they are moved away by pulling or another gank. they wont follow you if you are in a pod .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xuixien](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/xuixien/32/416896_2.png) [@Xuixien](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Xuixien)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 10:17pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/155 "2021-11-06T22:17:12Z")

</div>

“does not affect response times”?

Uh…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qia\_Kare](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/qia_kare/32/279281_2.png) [@Qia\_Kare](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Qia_Kare)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 10:50pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/156 "2021-11-06T22:50:23Z")

</div>

What this means is that the response times are within the expected range based on deliberate programming. That you can gain a little extra time this way is a feature, and not a bug, and so using that feature is not an exploit.

Even though this seems to be what the author of the reddit post means, it does seem at odds with what we’ve seen posted by GM Icecream, and so we’re left wondering whether CCP thinks it’s a bug, a feature, or if there’s a wheel they spin every time to decide which interpretation to use on a case by case basis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gix\_Firebrand](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gix_firebrand/32/456949_2.png) [@Gix\_Firebrand](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gix_Firebrand)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 10:55pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/157 "2021-11-06T22:55:30Z")

</div>

> [@Karak\_Terrel](#):
>
> So CCP is now suddenly out of nowhere banning players that for using mechanics they deliberately put into the game this way and they previously stated are not considered exploits?
> 
> Classic CCP move. God I’m glad I left this game behind me. Imagine paying for a game and playing it by the rules and still always having to fear a ban, just because they put a game mechanic in a new generation of GM are uncomfortable with and suddenly judge differently.
> 
> Actually we said for years that this mechanic is ■■■■■■■■. Spawning CONCORD to get the optimal gank time is a chore and why are you not simply make those response times the same. Problem solved. How ■■■■■■■ hard can it be?

Imagine posting on a forum of a game you no longer play 😃

> [@Scipio\_Artelius](#):
>
> New AG tactic should just be to spawn CONCORD. Gankers can’t do anything about it.

I suggested this like a month ago and Drac/Rroff said it was dumb 😃 But it literally works LOL.

> [@Scipio\_Artelius](#):
>
> Take even miners out of it.
> 
> Just spawn CONCORD on gate in Uedama and you can continue to move them around to shorten the response time and gankers can do nothing to change that.
> 
> AG can viably now just create instant CONCORD response.

Yep! I posted this tactic like a month ago and people did not understand it LOL.

> [@Kurt\_Kurtiss](#):
>
> Uedama just got a whole lot boring. rip @Jason_Kusion , @Bob_Painter and @Aiko_Danuja ! I hope you successfully find other jobs!

Aiko doesn’t gate gank tho ROFL.

> [@Lana\_Thomas](#):
>
> you just can’t help yourself, can’t you? you are utterly unable to positively contribute to a topic and can’t control yourself not to be belitteling and condescending to other people, can’t you, @Dracvlad ?

Yep. He drives people away from AGing. I don’t know if thats good or bad LOL.

> [@Zoiie](#):
>
> Perhaps forums should be for active Omega accounts only?

Finally you make sense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Karak\_Terrel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/karak_terrel/32/373453_2.png) [@Karak\_Terrel](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Karak_Terrel)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 11:44pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/158 "2021-11-06T23:44:09Z")

</div>

> [@Gix\_Firebrand](#):
>
> Imagine posting on a forum of a game you no longer play

correction: On a game I won. I’m just taking a victory lap around the peasants who still play this husk of a once great game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ridley\_Rohan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ridley_rohan/32/403694_2.png) [@Ridley\_Rohan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ridley_Rohan)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2021, 11:57pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/159 "2021-11-06T23:57:30Z")

</div>

> [@Gix\_Firebrand](#):
>
> Imagine posting on a forum of a game you no longer play

That broken record crappola of a contention ought to be labelled as mass harassment in general, and in this case, direct harassment.

Gankers are always screaming that ganking is intended gameplay, you included. Well guess what? Posting on the forum without playing or paying is also intended by CCP. So buck up and get used to it. Or, open a thread about it if you really want a change. It would be more effective than harassing posters over it non-stop.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gix\_Firebrand](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gix_firebrand/32/456949_2.png) [@Gix\_Firebrand](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gix_Firebrand)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 12:01am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/160 "2021-11-07T00:01:37Z")

</div>

> [@Karak\_Terrel](#):
>
> correction: On a game I won. I’m just taking a victory lap around the peasants who still play this husk of a once great game.

You didn’t win? You’re still posting and its still taking up head space. You have definitely lost LOL.

> [@Ridley\_Rohan](#):
>
> That broken record crappola of a contention ought to be labelled as mass harassment in general, and in this case, direct harassment.
> 
> Gankers are always screaming that ganking is intended gameplay, you included. Well guess what? Posting on the forum without playing or paying is also intended by CCP. So buck up and get used to it. Or, open a thread about it if you really want a change. It would be more effective than harassing posters over it non-stop.

1. Bro, you don’t even play, you’re a second class EVE citizen 😃
2. Ganking is indeed, intended gameplay and does not violate the TOS. You literally cannot say otherwise.
3. The difference is, you are posting on the forum with intent to harm playstyles that you don’t agree with from a game you no longer play. Sir, you literally are the griefer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Karak\_Terrel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/karak_terrel/32/373453_2.png) [@Karak\_Terrel](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Karak_Terrel)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 12:02am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/161 "2021-11-07T00:02:04Z")

</div>

> [@Gix\_Firebrand](#):
>
> You didn’t win? You’re still posting and its still taking up head space. You have definitely lost LOL.

Cool, stay mad. LOL

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gix\_Firebrand](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gix_firebrand/32/456949_2.png) [@Gix\_Firebrand](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gix_Firebrand)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 12:03am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/162 "2021-11-07T00:03:08Z")

</div>

> [@Karak\_Terrel](#):
>
> Cool, stay mad. LOL

I’m not mad? You just made me giggle tho. Imagine thinking you’ve won and all you do is post on a game forum that you don’t play anymore. I cannot imagine anything more pathetic. You have truly made me laugh out loud 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Karak\_Terrel](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/karak_terrel/32/373453_2.png) [@Karak\_Terrel](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Karak_Terrel)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2021, 12:03am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527/163 "2021-11-07T00:03:22Z")

</div>

Did not read your answer. LOL

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/ccp-rules-discussion-on-ganking-and-concord-mechanics-2021-11-06/335527.md?page=9)
