# Citadel proliferation, it's effect on FW and Null sec, and a possbile solution

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Tags:** null-sec, low-sec, high-sec\
**Created:** [November 16, 2019, 9:23pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212 "2019-11-16T21:23:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nicolai\_Serkanner](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/nicolai_serkanner/32/358049_2.png) [@Nicolai\_Serkanner](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Nicolai_Serkanner)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 10:23am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212/22 "2019-11-17T10:23:10Z")

</div>

> [@El-Bee\_Leblanc](#):
>
> By tying the anchoring of Citadels to IHUBS in Faction Warfare, TCUs in Sov Null, and Faction standings in High sec, Low sec and NPC Null anchoring a Citadel becomes a more strategic decision than previously.

No, go away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bado\_Sten](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/bado_sten/32/484410_2.png) [@Bado\_Sten](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Bado_Sten)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 3:06pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212/23 "2019-11-17T15:06:40Z")

</div>

> [@Daichi\_Yamato](#):
>
> Instead I’d rather see something like an LP cost upkeep akin to starbase charters for faction warfare structures.

That’s not a bad idea, but LP is individual while structures are owned by corporations. That would have to be solved somehow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Daichi\_Yamato](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/daichi_yamato/32/252995_2.png) [@Daichi\_Yamato](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Daichi_Yamato)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 3:53pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212/24 "2019-11-17T15:53:00Z")

</div>

I was thinking an lp store item.

But reading your post made me realise there is already a mechanic for ‘donating’ lp. I-hub upgrades.

Would it so far fetched to donate lp to a structure?

Edit-  
And by the way CCP, this is another reason corp tax on lp would be awesome…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eivar](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/eivar/32/178879_2.png) [@Eivar](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Eivar)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 6:08pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212/25 "2019-11-17T18:08:13Z")

</div>

The proliferation may have less to do with warfare than with the insane amount of structure blueprints that routinely drop. If it’s easy to get one, there’s no urgency to protecting one, but it still _should_ be hard to take one down, it’s a _citadel_ fer cripe’s sake.

If you’re proposing that the flag on the mast change in favor of the winning force, that’s somewhat interesting, but I don’t want to be playing WoW in Space.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Daichi\_Yamato](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/daichi_yamato/32/252995_2.png) [@Daichi\_Yamato](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Daichi_Yamato)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2019, 7:54pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212/26 "2019-11-17T19:54:53Z")

</div>

> [@Eivar](#):
>
> If it’s easy to get one, there’s no urgency to protecting one

If its difficult to get one they become very expensive and for the rich only. Goons can still spam but everyone else can’t. But if they are both easy to get and easy to destroy, it puts focus back onto the ships/players.

Spammed Astrahus shouldn’t take a week to take out. But Johnny-hisec’s homebase for his little corp should. So maybe we should go back to stront fuelling/extending reinforce timers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eivar](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/eivar/32/178879_2.png) [@Eivar](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Eivar)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2019, 9:08am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212/27 "2019-11-18T09:08:33Z")

</div>

I should’ve said easy to _replace_, which is relative to industrial capabilities and expendable assets as much as the quantity of BP drops.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/3X/4/1/41ec4921cbaca7a6f9ea556e7cc20018461eae5e.png) [@system](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2020, 9:08am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212/28 "2020-02-16T09:08:38Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/citadel-proliferation-its-effect-on-fw-and-null-sec-and-a-possbile-solution/201212.md?page=1)
