# Devblog: CSM Winter Summit 2019 Meeting Minutes

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215>\
**Category:** Dev Blogs\
**Tags:** devblog, csm\
**Created:** [March 19, 2019, 3:28pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215 "2019-03-19T15:28:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/erebus_thechin_sundance/32/375165_2.png) [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Erebus_TheChin_Sundance)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 11:17am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/367 "2019-04-02T11:17:39Z")

</div>

> [@Penance\_Toralen](#):
>
> Then would not that be ALL implants then? Would I really want to take a frigate outside a high security with a head full of Nomads or Virtues? There will always be a barrier or excuse while any Implant remains.

Again, that is both reactionary and extreme… we are attempting to circumvent this. Risking implants needs to remain a significant thing. I think we all feel that. I would not have empty 1-5 slots, just not necessarily learning ones, if for example I loose a pod (I have a few now) in teir 4 abyss space, I’ll still be loosing expensive ■■■■.

> [@March\_rabbit](#):
>
> The most glaring example for me was training clones.

Risking implants is not the issue, loosing skill training time as a result of a daft, dare I say, unneeded system is. This is precisely why the having to contantly update your clone was removed, not to increase pvp, to reduce skill loss.

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/erebus_thechin_sundance/32/375165_2.png) [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Erebus_TheChin_Sundance)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 11:25am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/368 "2019-04-02T11:25:17Z")

</div>

> [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
>
> Easy fix, just remove the timer on Neural Remaps so players can change attributes whenever they change skill groups.

This would indeed fix a large part of the problem. I have been asking for a bonus remap for a xmass gift for a while now.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arrendis](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/arrendis/32/432594_2.png) [@Arrendis](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Arrendis)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 12:38pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/369 "2019-04-02T12:38:29Z")

</div>

> [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
>
> Maybe CCP needs to do a better job of explaining the User Interface.

I think that’s pretty universally acknowledged, yeah.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Omnathious\_Deninard](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/omnathious_deninard/32/266675_2.png) [@Omnathious\_Deninard](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Omnathious_Deninard)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 1:14pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/370 "2019-04-02T13:14:37Z")

</div>

> [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](#):
>
> This is precisely why the having to contantly update your clone was removed, not to increase pvp, to reduce skill loss.

It was actually neither of those, it was for when high SP characters wanted to PVP and had to spend 50M isk on a new clone so they could go out and PVP in a 5M isk frigate fight.  
Removing skill loss was a beneficial side effect.

> [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
>
> Easy fix, just remove the timer on Neural Remaps so players can change attributes whenever they change skill groups.

Isn’t that effectively the same as removing attribute scores?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arrendis](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/arrendis/32/432594_2.png) [@Arrendis](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Arrendis)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 1:20pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/371 "2019-04-02T13:20:46Z")

</div>

Yes, but only for people who know about remaps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/erebus_thechin_sundance/32/375165_2.png) [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Erebus_TheChin_Sundance)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 2:05pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/372 "2019-04-02T14:05:47Z")

</div>

I think we should decide this by post.

We all mail an orange to CCP HQ, winner takes all. 🍊

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeMichael\_Crimson](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/demichael_crimson/32/514115_2.png) [@DeMichael\_Crimson](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/DeMichael_Crimson)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 3:13pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/373 "2019-04-02T15:13:01Z")

</div>

> [@Omnathious\_Deninard](#):
>
> > [@DeMichael\_Crimson](#):
> >
> > Easy fix, just remove the timer on Neural Remaps so players can change attributes whenever they change skill groups.
> 
> Isn’t that effectively the same as removing attribute scores?

No it’s not the same. Removing the remap timer should be fairly easy for CCP compared to reworking attribute game mechanics and all items effected by it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brisc\_Rubal](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/brisc_rubal/32/374307_2.png) [@Brisc\_Rubal](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Brisc_Rubal)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 7:02pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/374 "2019-04-02T19:02:23Z")

</div>

I’m surprised that there are so many people who seem to think attributes are the most important part of the game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nevyn\_Auscent](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/nevyn_auscent/32/255124_2.png) [@Nevyn\_Auscent](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Nevyn_Auscent)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2019, 11:14pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/375 "2019-04-02T23:14:32Z")

</div>

I don’t think there are, because most of those people have also said “I don’t bother with them”. They are just very loud in saying others should have to put up with them, while they have enough SP to no longer care.  
If you go back to the learning skills discussion I’m sure you’ll find similar there as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/erebus_thechin_sundance/32/375165_2.png) [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Erebus_TheChin_Sundance)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2019, 9:45am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/376 "2019-04-03T09:45:36Z")

</div>

[![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/3X/d/c/dcf6276920d4f727e9e0eda0de085a8f32a51cd7.jpeg)](https://imgflip.com/i/2xldv6)[via Imgflip Meme Generator](https://imgflip.com/memegenerator)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MB\_ThePhotographer](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/mb_thephotographer/32/373722_2.png) [@MB\_ThePhotographer](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/MB_ThePhotographer)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2019, 11:23pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/377 "2019-04-03T23:23:03Z")

</div>

They see it as a messy system that can be improved by player input still. One that they still have a say in, so to speak, not the most important. So they speak about it. I say give free remaps for the first year, (so they learn the system, (facepalm after facepalm lol) 2 remaps for the next 2 years, then down to 1, or something like that. I like the system the way it is because when you have a year of skill to train, (capitols) it helps a lot.

I get the impression that everyone stopped talking about the other topics because we have no more say in them other than what’s already been posted. Hence, above…

At least this subject discussion is not a rude pissing match!🤐

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![March\_rabbit](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/march_rabbit/32/453160_2.png) [@March\_rabbit](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/March_rabbit)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 7:04am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/378 "2019-04-04T07:04:58Z")

</div>

This is the choice you need to make. Like Faction/Corporation standings when you run missions or when you join FW.

Are you saying that removing choices one by one is a good thing for the game?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![March\_rabbit](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/march_rabbit/32/453160_2.png) [@March\_rabbit](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/March_rabbit)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 7:09am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/379 "2019-04-04T07:09:26Z")

</div>

> [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](#):
>
> This is precisely why the having to contantly update your clone was removed, not to increase pvp, to reduce skill loss.

To reduce skill lose incurring by …? You only lose your pod when pvp (mainly) or when pod-express (rare occurrence, mostly happen when you lost your ship and don’t want to give them another kill).

So no, removal of clone upgrades was linked to pvp.

> [@Brisc\_Rubal](#):
>
> I’m surprised that there are so many people who seem to think attributes are the most important part of the game.

Maybe not the most important but the only one deserved discussion?  
I personally never take seriously these meetings. “CCP said XXX, we said YYY.” Years passed and next CSM mention basically the same things in their summit minutes. Nothing really changes until CCP itself chooses something to be changed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/erebus_thechin_sundance/32/375165_2.png) [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Erebus_TheChin_Sundance)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 8:14am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/380 "2019-04-04T08:14:57Z")

</div>

> [@March\_rabbit](#):
>
> I personally never take seriously these meetings.

Ever had the harrowing near-death experience of take off from Keflavik International Airport.?

That’s some serious sheet man. The plane aims directly at a mountain and flies full full-bore towards it. I think it fair to say that those of the CSM that go to iceland take it seriously. 😜

Edit:  
It would seem changing things in EVE in not without complications and the ramifications can not always be envisioned.

Let’s not argue over why clone upgrades were removed, it’s in the past now. CCP’s reasoning often has numerous facets of interpretability. It was pre driffters/abyss space so pod loss was indeed either pvp or self harm related.

_BUT…_ Now they are gone, do we miss them? I don’t. Yourself?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![March\_rabbit](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/march_rabbit/32/453160_2.png) [@March\_rabbit](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/March_rabbit)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 9:55am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/381 "2019-04-04T09:55:27Z")

</div>

> [@Erebus\_TheChin\_Sundance](#):
>
> Ever had the harrowing near-death experience of take off from Keflavik International Airport.?
> 
> That’s some serious sheet man. The plane aims directly at a mountain and flies full full-bore towards it. I think it fair to say that those of the CSM that go to iceland take it seriously. 😜

😯  
👍

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arrendis](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/arrendis/32/432594_2.png) [@Arrendis](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Arrendis)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 2:41pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/382 "2019-04-04T14:41:34Z")

</div>

Ah, that old canard.

Complexity is good, as long as it’s good complexity. Complexity that provides options and opportunities is good. Complexity that produces frustration and confusion is not. Do attributes and remapping provide opportunities?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![March\_rabbit](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/march_rabbit/32/453160_2.png) [@March\_rabbit](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/March_rabbit)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 2:57pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/383 "2019-04-04T14:57:13Z")

</div>

> [@Arrendis](#):
>
> Do attributes and remapping provide opportunities?

My guess is they do. Proper using provides for higher SP collected, improper - for lower.

Whether they provide options and opportunities or frustration and confusion is a personal matter. I think it is not far from “not sure - use Gila” rule in PVE. Some can find fun in playing with fits and optimizing tactics while others prefer lazy way to complete the task. Sure first group will have better ISK/hour but both ways are legit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arrendis](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/arrendis/32/432594_2.png) [@Arrendis](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Arrendis)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 3:33pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/384 "2019-04-04T15:33:15Z")

</div>

> [@March\_rabbit](#):
>
> My guess is they do. Proper using provides for higher SP collected, improper - for lower.

Is that an opportunity, or is it a penalty? Is maximizing your skill training speed a way to expand and enhance your gameplay, to get options that you would otherwise never _need_, but might enjoy?

Or is it the introduction of an opaque system that isn’t well-explained to new players, and which locks you into sub-optimal performance for an extended period of time—without the opportunity to reset it—if you fail to grasp all of the complexities that are being poorly-explained?

> [@March\_rabbit](#):
>
> I think it is not far from “not sure - use Gila” rule in PVE

You mean ‘not sure - use [ship that is being specifically targeted for nerfs partly because it’s that much of a default]’?

That doesn’t exactly support the idea that attributes are the way things _should_ be.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![March\_rabbit](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/march_rabbit/32/453160_2.png) [@March\_rabbit](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/March_rabbit)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 3:52pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/385 "2019-04-04T15:52:32Z")

</div>

> [@Arrendis](#):
>
> Is maximizing your skill training speed a way to expand and enhance your gameplay, to get options that you would otherwise never _need_ , but might enjoy?

Here you should not ask me because i have never cared about amount of SP i have collected. I always played with the system we have and maximized it as much as possible without losing ability to play:

- used EveMon to optimize my training plans by adding Learning skills and remaps where it provided actual benefit
- never followed rules like “do not use battleship until you have all support skills and gunnery skills”. My first Dominix was fitted with medium guns and T1 drones, half T1/T2 modules and dual shield/armor tank and yet, i was doing stuff with it having fun where possible).

So you better ask those who supported removal of Learning skills and now supporting removal of Attributes why they need that anything less than maximum possible training speed is acceptable.

> [@Arrendis](#):
>
> Or is it the introduction of an opaque system that isn’t well-explained to new players, and which locks you into sub-optimal performance for an extended period of time—without the opportunity to reset it—if you fail to grasp all of the complexities that are being poorly-explained?

To this i can only say that it’s the task for CCP to properly document and describe systems they develop and present.  
Other than that if i’m not mistaken we don’t have good and full documentation about missions, complexes, ships and modules. Difference between shield tank and armor tank and where to use which. How to deal with jammers and dampers in PVE, etc, etc…

At least i don’t remember reading it in EvE client or somewhere in CCP’s internet resources. Correct me if i’m wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arrendis](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/arrendis/32/432594_2.png) [@Arrendis](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Arrendis)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2019, 4:51pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215/386 "2019-04-04T16:51:47Z")

</div>

You’re not. We don’t have all of that important, useful information.

But CCP’s been _trying_ to get better about documenting it. Either way, as we see with the VNI and Gila, this idea of ‘oh, well, if you don’t know what you’re doing, here’s a go-to’ doesn’t seem to be the direction they want to support.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215.md?page=18)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-csm-winter-summit-2019-meeting-minutes/147215.md?page=20)
