# \[Devblog\] The Future of Force Projection Feedback Thread

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961>\
**Category:** Dev Blogs\
**Tags:** devblog\
**Created:** [July 17, 2026, 12:44pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961 "2026-07-17T12:44:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/geo_eclipse_oksaras/32/500781_2.png) [@Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Geo_Eclipse_Oksaras)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 1:42am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/242 "2026-07-19T01:42:06Z")

</div>

Whats your solution???

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Axhind](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/axhind/32/461932_2.png) [@Axhind](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Axhind)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 1:44am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/243 "2026-07-19T01:44:08Z")

</div>

> [@\[Devblog\] The Future of Force Projection Feedback Thread](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/233):
>
> Large part of that stagnation is self-inflicted. CCP has been pushing elite pvp narrative and playstyle for decades by now. Is it so strange that big chunk of people are super risk averse? Imagine if their kb showed some red? The absolute horror!!! Especially if you know that you can just hide in NPC station then why take any fight that you are not absolutely sure of winning? Look at PL, that is the only way they have played eve since day one. Step on much smaller group and then proclaim how e…

I already wrote what I think would be a good first step. Making it harder for people to fight is for sure not the solution. In a way CCP and their elite pvp buddies are useful. You can be nearly 100% sure that anything they propose is self-serving drivel that is bad for the game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 1:49am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/244 "2026-07-19T01:49:55Z")

</div>

I dont know why some of you here think that jsut because what they propose is terrible we need to solve the problem thats got nothing to do with their proposal.

To simlify it.

FC proposes to jump in well.  
We think jumping in well is bad.  
You ask us how we would fix a flat tyre on a car.

You see how these things dont correlate?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/geo_eclipse_oksaras/32/500781_2.png) [@Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Geo_Eclipse_Oksaras)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:04am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/245 "2026-07-19T02:04:59Z")

</div>

> Zone-based limitations are intended to challenge that dynamic. By creating incentives to focus activity, infrastructure, and economic development within specific areas, the system encourages groups to prioritize the regions that matter most to them rather than treating enormous stretches of space as equally defendable territory
> 
> The goal is to reduce the effectiveness of instantly projecting power across multiple regions and force organizations to make meaningful decisions about where they concentrate their resources and defensive capabilities.

you’re gonna sit and tell me thats a bad thing??

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:06am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/246 "2026-07-19T02:06:56Z")

</div>

> [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](#):
>
> FC proposes to jump in well.  
> We think jumping in well is bad.  
> You ask us how we would fix a flat tyre on a car.

That’s not even close to being similar. It’s more like:  
FC and it’s children need water, they think they should jump in the well to get water  
You think that it’s bad  
FC still needs to get water thoughfor their health, the problem remains and you won’t give the solution (in this case would be using a rope and a bucket)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:08am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/247 "2026-07-19T02:08:41Z")

</div>

What part of that made sense to you in your head?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:10am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/248 "2026-07-19T02:10:48Z")

</div>

If you can’t make sense of it, I can’t help you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:11am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/249 "2026-07-19T02:11:39Z")

</div>

It. Is. Not. My. Job. To. Solve. Stagnation.  
Whatever. This. Proposition. Is. Is. Not. Going. To. Solve. It. Either.

Do you not get it? Jumping in the well will not fix the flat tyre.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:15am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/250 "2026-07-19T02:15:56Z")

</div>

You’ll just have to be content with the results then. It’s _tire_ btw.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:18am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/251 "2026-07-19T02:18:46Z")

</div>

But i dont have to be. Its not an either this or what i propose thing. They can just not change it and go back to the drawing board. Or stop with the bs and tell us the real reason of these changes. You see not everything needs to happen. Sometimes not doing anything is better than doing “This”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:20am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/252 "2026-07-19T02:20:14Z")

</div>

If you aren’t content, then why don’t you want to propose a solution? Normally people want to _do_ something when they are not content.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:21am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/253 "2026-07-19T02:21:22Z")

</div>

You really really dense arent you? I will simplify this for you then again.  
Put hand in fire → BAD  
No put hand in fire → NO BAD

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/geo_eclipse_oksaras/32/500781_2.png) [@Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Geo_Eclipse_Oksaras)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:22am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/254 "2026-07-19T02:22:30Z")

</div>

a CSM member has explained it…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:24am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/255 "2026-07-19T02:24:10Z")

</div>

So your solution is to do nothing, that’s not that hard to just say man… (that is a solution).

Then again Fenris would just be ignoring what the CSM and players have said is a problem though and so they will be blamed for that if they followed your advise.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:24am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/256 "2026-07-19T02:24:19Z")

</div>

I be honest. With the track record of CSM achievments. I dont think most of us cares what they explained or not. When they have no say in what CCP does or dont…

Yes they proposed something. And Yes CCP yet again threw that in the bin and gone with what they had in mind from the start.

PS. This is not the CSMs fault. Its been like this for forever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/geo_eclipse_oksaras/32/500781_2.png) [@Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Geo_Eclipse_Oksaras)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:29am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/257 "2026-07-19T02:29:06Z")

</div>

CCP didn’t do anything… Fenris Creations did this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:30am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/258 "2026-07-19T02:30:26Z")

</div>

Yeah haha funny for the 6000x time. Haha. CCP = FC very funny haha rebrand. I will call them CCP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:34am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/260 "2026-07-19T02:34:01Z")

</div>

Yeah but i dont care lol. Ever since the rebrand they act like its a new company or the devs changed. FC this FC that. Nothing changed. The name might be. Calling them by the old one doesnt change who we talking about. Its not a new team.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:35am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/261 "2026-07-19T02:35:37Z")

</div>

No one is saying it’s a new team, they aren’t acting like a new company either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2026, 2:37am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961/262 "2026-07-19T02:37:13Z")

</div>

Have you seen their recent interactions? They try everything so ppl think they arent the old CCP but something brand new with fresh minds.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961.md?page=12)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/devblog-the-future-of-force-projection-feedback-thread/514961.md?page=14)
