# EVE Online: The New Eden Frontier — A Persistent NPC Invasion & Living Warfront **URL:** \ **Category:** Player Features & Ideas\ **Tags:** sovereignty, capitals, industry\ **Created:** [October 17, 2026, 8:40pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-online-the-new-eden-frontier-a-persistent-npc-invasion-living-warfront/520402 "2026-10-17T20:40:41Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Dravos](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/dravos/32/515164_2.png) [@Dravos](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Dravos)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 8:40pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-online-the-new-eden-frontier-a-persistent-npc-invasion-living-warfront/520402/1 "2026-10-17T20:40:41Z")
# EVE ONLINE: THE NEW EDEN FRONTIER ## A Proposal for a Persistent, Adaptive Invasion Expansion _An evolving war for territory, resources, survival, and the future of New Eden._ ### The Vision EVE Online has always been at its most memorable when players have something meaningful to fight for. A corporation establishes its first home. An industrialist spends weeks constructing a capital ship. An alliance builds a logistical network capable of sustaining thousands of pilots. A small group of friends ventures into dangerous space hoping to return with something valuable. These achievements matter because players created them. But imagine introducing a new force into New Eden: a hostile civilization that does not exist simply to provide missions, bounties, or predictable encounters. It has territory, military objectives, supply networks, industrial requirements, and an interest in the same resources and infrastructure players value. It can invade. It can retreat. It can lose. It can recover battlefield wreckage, transport valuable materials, reinforce strategic positions, and occasionally concentrate enough force to threaten even the largest alliances. Most importantly, players can fight back and make meaningful progress. **The New Eden Frontier** proposes a permanent, strategically responsive NPC civilization introduced through an ambitious, potentially multi-year invasion campaign. The goal is not to replace EVE’s player-driven sandbox. It is to give that sandbox a new, independent participant—one capable of creating opportunities, danger, and memorable stories long after the initial expansion concludes. The proposal also explores accompanying changes to resource discovery, salvaging, capital-ship roles, mobile fleet logistics, and localized security. This is a concept for discussion and adaptation, not a claim that every proposed mechanic can or should be implemented exactly as written. * * * ## 1. A New Civilization With Its Own Interests The invading civilization would originate from newly introduced regions connected to the existing New Eden map. Rather than immediately replacing established player territory, these regions would serve as its permanent homeland, containing industrial complexes, military installations, shipyards, logistics hubs, and strategic fortresses. The civilization would conduct operations beyond its borders. Its objectives could include: - Securing valuable resource concentrations. - Establishing forward military bases. - Attacking strategic infrastructure. - Recovering equipment and materials from battlefields. - Disrupting enemy logistics. - Expanding into vulnerable territory. - Defending supply lines and industrial facilities. - Organizing major campaigns against valuable player-controlled regions. The AI should not behave like a moral authority that punishes piracy, large alliances, or aggressive players. A pirate corporation, a highsec industrialist, an empire faction, and a major nullsec coalition could all become targets for different strategic reasons. The civilization should pursue its own interests, even when those interests temporarily align with one player group against another. ### An adaptive opponent, not an omniscient one The term _adaptive AI_ does not require unrestricted machine learning or an NPC opponent capable of perfect decisions. A practical implementation could use strategic decision systems, defined military doctrines, intelligence gathered from encounters, and periodically adjusted behavior based on aggregated combat outcomes. Its commanders might learn that a region relies heavily on certain fleet compositions, recognize exposed supply routes, or retreat when an engagement becomes unfavorable. But the AI must operate within constraints. It should have limited resources, finite operational commitments, imperfect intelligence, and the ability to suffer meaningful defeat. Players must be able to outthink it. **A challenging enemy is one that makes credible decisions—not one that secretly knows everything or produces infinite reinforcements.** * * * ## 2. The Great Invasion: A Multi-Year War The expansion would begin with a major invasion that disrupts established assumptions across New Eden. Rather than ending after a conventional one- or three-month event, the principal campaign could unfold over approximately two to four years, or another duration CCP determines is sustainable. This should not mean uninterrupted maximum-intensity warfare. The campaign would have offensives, withdrawals, consolidation periods, regional crises, and opportunities for players to recover. Its intensity could evolve with participation, server performance, economic conditions, and the actual state of the war. Some regions might experience severe invasions. Others might become temporary refuges, industrial centers, or staging grounds for counteroffensives. ### A defining opening event: The Fall of Jita One ambitious possibility is the permanent destruction of Jita 4-4 and potentially other major trade infrastructure during the opening invasion. The purpose would not be to erase players’ accomplishments. It would be to create an unmistakable historical event: a powerful new civilization has arrived, and even New Eden’s most established infrastructure is not necessarily permanent. **Player and corporation assets must be protected.** Any destruction of a major NPC trade station would require a comprehensive recovery system that preserves existing assets, including those belonging to inactive players. Recovery should be free, reliable, accessible without an arbitrary expiration date, and available through eligible replacement stations. The station itself could become a permanent wreck or memorial, while trade and industry reorganize around surviving and newly developed hubs. This could create lasting changes to economic geography without destroying years of individual investment. However, permanent destruction of Jita should be evaluated as a major narrative and economic option, not an unavoidable prerequisite for the rest of the expansion. CCP could explore alternatives such as a prolonged blockade, evacuation, loss of services, partial destruction, or permanent transformation of the location. The intended outcome is the same: **New Eden remembers the invasion.** * * * ## 3. A Permanent War After the Opening Campaign The invasion’s initial intensity would eventually decline, but the new civilization would remain. Its presence would become part of EVE’s permanent world. The civilization would continue to operate military bases, recover resources, maintain supply networks, and occasionally expand beyond its homeland. Its activity would take several forms. ### Contested frontier territory Some systems could be captured, occupied, liberated, and recaptured. Players might destroy an AI forward base and reclaim a system. The AI could later attempt to retake it if the location remains strategically valuable. Holding territory should matter, but victory must be possible. Destroying a major AI logistics hub could reduce its ability to reinforce nearby operations. Defeating an invasion should create an earned period of relative security rather than an immediate, identical replacement attack. ### Permanent AI home regions The civilization’s core homeland would remain permanently under its control. These regions would provide exceptionally dangerous expeditionary content, including valuable resources, military installations, industrial facilities, and recoverable materials. Players could enter to mine, salvage, raid, explore, and conduct major assaults. They could establish temporary expeditionary positions, but not permanently conquer the homeland. A corporation might deploy a mobile forward base, extract rare resources, raid a warehouse, and escape with substantial profits. Remaining too long would invite increasing military attention. The challenge would be knowing when to withdraw. Temporary player installations in these regions could have explicit deployment limits, while the AI’s response would emerge from reconnaissance, territorial defense, and available military forces. ### Periodic major offensives Even years after the initial campaign, the civilization could occasionally concentrate its forces for a major regional offensive. An alliance capital, important industrial region, or strategic trade corridor might become a target. A large coalition could receive warning through AI reconnaissance, military buildups, supply movements, and attacks on surrounding infrastructure. Players would have time to organize defenses. These campaigns might last days or weeks and could culminate in major fleet battles, infrastructure sieges, territorial losses, or decisive player victories. The objective is not to guarantee destruction. **An alliance successfully repelling an invasion should be just as meaningful as the AI capturing territory.** * * * ## 4. Universal Resource Opportunity and Frontier Anomalies EVE’s security classifications currently influence which resources and activities are available in different regions. This proposal explores reducing that geographical separation without eliminating the need for different levels of risk. The guiding principle is simple: **Every region of New Eden should have the potential to offer valuable opportunities, while danger, abundance, accessibility, and efficiency determine the reward.** Tritanium and other foundational resources could be more broadly available, including in nullsec. Likewise, valuable resources traditionally associated with more dangerous space could occasionally appear in highsec through special resource pockets. This would not require every asteroid belt to contain every mineral. Instead, existing mining-anomaly and exploration systems could provide the foundation for temporary, localized opportunities. ### Frontier resource pockets A valuable anomaly might appear in a highsec system. It could contain resources worth substantially more than ordinary local deposits. A small corporation might discover a manageable site. A major alliance might identify an exceptional deposit worth organizing a capital-supported industrial expedition around. Some pockets would be relatively quiet. Others would attract hostile reconnaissance, raiding forces, or major AI operations. The surrounding solar system could retain its normal security classification while the anomaly operates under clearly communicated special conditions. ### Dynamic security commitments CONCORD or empire expeditionary forces would evaluate whether a resource pocket is worth defending. Their decisions could consider the deposit’s strategic value, nearby military threats, available NPC forces, and player involvement. A corporation that brings mining barges, an Orca, and several defensive fleets could influence the military situation enough to make an NPC intervention viable. Alternatively, CONCORD might decline to commit forces because the operation is too dangerous or strategically unimportant. The invading civilization would independently assess whether the resources, ships, or military position justify an attack. A large fleet should not automatically trigger a larger AI fleet. The invaders should decide whether an engagement is worthwhile. ### Preserving ordinary highsec gameplay A key safeguard is that highsec must remain understandable and accessible. Ordinary CONCORD criminal enforcement should remain distinct from defeatable expeditionary forces participating in the invasion. Where an anomaly changes enforcement or engagement rules, those rules must be disclosed before entry. A player mining in an ordinary highsec belt should not unexpectedly lose familiar protections because a distant anomaly appeared. The goal is to offer voluntary exposure to greater danger—not to remove every relatively predictable activity from the game. * * * ## 5. Reconsidering Ship Access Across New Eden A related long-term ambition is to reconsider whether capital ships should remain geographically restricted as rigidly as they are today. Imagine an alliance deploying dreadnoughts, carriers, supercarriers, or Titans to protect a particularly valuable resource operation. That commitment creates both military strength and strategic exposure. The AI might recognize the operation as a valuable target, conduct reconnaissance, attack its supporting logistics, or assemble a force capable of challenging it. Alternatively, it might avoid an engagement that offers little chance of success. This creates risk through military circumstances rather than simply prohibiting a ship class from entering a region. However, unrestricted capital access raises significant concerns involving highsec safety, sovereignty warfare, structure attacks, travel, and the ability of major alliances to dominate smaller groups. For that reason, universal capital mobility should be treated as an **ambitious balance objective requiring separate testing** , not as a mandatory requirement for the invasion to function. Possible intermediate implementations include specially designated capital-capable expeditionary environments and carefully limited combat permissions. The intention is to create more worthwhile reasons to deploy expensive ships, while preserving meaningful opportunities for smaller corporations. * * * ## 6. Capital Warfare Renaissance Titans and other supercapitals represent extraordinary industrial investment. They should remain powerful strategic assets. But their usefulness should extend beyond waiting in reserve for a major player-versus-player war. The invading civilization could create new capital-scale activities: - Assaults against heavily defended AI fortresses. - Defense of strategically important player infrastructure. - Interception of AI capital formations. - Destruction of military logistics hubs. - Major siege operations requiring coordinated fleets. - Expeditionary warfare in hostile AI homeland regions. These encounters should not require Titans for every meaningful objective. Subcapital fleets, industrialists, haulers, scouts, and smaller corporations must retain valuable roles. ### Making capital losses sustainable The expansion could also revisit capital production and replacement economics. Broader resource access, valuable AI salvage, recovered industrial components, and adjustments to manufacturing requirements could help make capital replacement more achievable. The goal is not necessarily to make Titans cheap or disposable. It is to ensure that the prospect of losing one does not make players unwilling to use it for compelling gameplay. **A Titan should be valuable because of what it can accomplish, not only because of what it costs.** * * * ## 7. Combat Titans and Mobile Utility Titans This proposal introduces a complementary Titan-scale support vessel designed to sustain major expeditions. The two ships would have fundamentally different roles. ### Combat Titan: The Siege Breaker Existing combat Titans would retain their identity as strategic weapons. They would use appropriate capital-scale weapon systems and their doomsday capabilities. Their role in a siege would be to advance into an effective attack position against a fortified objective and threaten that objective with overwhelming firepower. A defended installation should have ways to interrupt the siege. Players could disable key systems, disrupt support fleets, interfere with the Titan’s attack sequence, or force it to withdraw. The Combat Titan would carry limited replacement supplies and offer restricted fleet support, but it would not be a fully self-sufficient mobile station. ### Utility Titan: The Expeditionary Forward Operating Base A new Titan-scale vessel would prioritize fleet support rather than direct capital firepower. It would have no conventional turret or missile weapons. Instead, its distinctive capabilities could include: - A large defensive and support drone complement. - Remote repair, energy transfer, tractor, and salvage systems. - Extensive ship and equipment storage. - Fleet refitting and limited reshipping services. - Ammunition, fuel, and material reserves. - Restricted onboard manufacturing or replenishment. - Access-controlled corporation and fleet logistics. One possible signature feature is the ability to deploy dozens of ordinary drones, potentially 30–50, creating a genuine defensive swarm. That exact count would require careful technical and performance testing. Squadron-based simulation could be considered if individual drone performance becomes prohibitive. The vessel could operate in a mobile support configuration or deploy temporarily as a fortified FOB. In its deployed configuration, it would provide expanded services but accept meaningful limitations on mobility and escape. It should be defensible, not invulnerable. It should support a fleet, not replace one. ### Supply lines become gameplay A Utility Titan’s stores would be finite. Blockade runners, industrial haulers, jump freighters, and other logistics ships would have meaningful reasons to deliver ammunition, fuel, replacement equipment, and construction materials. A major siege would therefore depend on more than raw damage. Defenders could intercept supply convoys, attack the mobile FOB, disrupt escorts, or disable the Combat Titan before its siege becomes decisive. Attackers would have to protect the infrastructure sustaining their offensive. The Combat Titan threatens the fortress. The Utility Titan keeps the offensive alive. The logistics fleet keeps both supplied. * * * ## 8. Strategic Isolation: Stargate and Cynosural Disruption The invading civilization could possess specialized military infrastructure capable of temporarily isolating a solar system. An AI strategic isolation pylon might disable stargate travel and cynosural or jump-drive reinforcement routes during a major defensive operation. This would be especially dangerous inside the AI’s homeland, where players knowingly undertake high-risk expeditions. A force entering hostile territory could discover that the AI has committed to containing it. Once isolation begins, the expedition must rely on the ships, ammunition, replacement equipment, and infrastructure already inside the affected area. Existing local stations and stored ships could remain usable where available. The pylon would be a physical military objective with vulnerabilities and counterplay. Destroying it would restore transit and trigger a meaningful cooldown before another equivalent isolation system could be deployed. ### Defending established player territory The AI should not casually shut down an established alliance capital without preparation or strategic justification. A major offensive against developed territory should involve recognizable military buildup and a meaningful warning period. Players could position reinforcements, prepare replacement ships, stock ammunition, and establish defensive plans before isolation becomes possible. The pylon should create a decisive tactical situation, not an unavoidable defeat. ### Limited player technology A smaller player-operated gate-disruption system could also be explored. One concept is a Heavy Interdictor module capable of temporarily disabling a single stargate in both directions. It would have short duration, strict deployment limits, and cooldowns preventing indefinite blockade. This should be evaluated separately from the far more powerful AI strategic isolation system. * * * ## 9. Intelligence Blackouts and Electronic Warfare The AI could also employ specialized electronic warfare installations that interfere with local intelligence. A spatial interference device might temporarily reduce reliable local-presence information or other automated intelligence within a defined area. This would create uncertainty around reconnaissance, fleet movements, and ambushes. It should not magically prevent players from communicating through ordinary channels. Counterplay could include locating and destroying the device, deploying specialized scanning equipment, and relying on active reconnaissance. A smaller player version could support covert raiding fleets, provided its duration, detectability, and restrictions preserve meaningful counterplay. The goal is to make intelligence gathering an active military profession rather than simply remove information without recourse. * * * ## 10. The AI Must Have an Economy One of the most important features is that the civilization should not destroy ships and then disappear without consequence. When the AI wins a battle, it should have reasons to recover what remains. Salvage vessels could enter the battlefield, extract surviving equipment and useful materials, and transport recovered cargo toward forward depots or regional warehouses. Players could attack these operations. An alliance might lose a valuable mining fleet, then organize an interception against the AI transports carrying its surviving equipment. Another corporation might locate the destination warehouse and launch a raid. Recovered materials could support AI manufacturing, repairs, logistics, and future operations. The AI should also consume military resources and suffer meaningful losses. Its strength should depend partly on the condition of its infrastructure and supply network. ### Strategic warehouses AI storage installations could exist at several scales: **Forward depots** would support local patrols and recent salvage operations. **Regional warehouses** would consolidate resources and equipment from multiple systems. **Military logistics hubs** would sustain large offensives, capital deployments, and territorial expansion. **Homeland industrial complexes** would provide the civilization’s long-term economic foundation. Destroying or capturing these objectives could disrupt the AI’s military plans and provide substantial rewards. This gives players meaningful targets beyond simply destroying NPC ships. * * * ## 11. Battlefield Salvaging as a Real Profession Salvaging should become a deeper, independently rewarding activity. The expansion could introduce dedicated probes capable of identifying concentrations of recoverable wreckage and battlefield debris. Two categories of sites would be especially valuable. ### Generated salvage fields Procedurally appearing debris sites could contain abandoned civilian vessels, lost military equipment, wreckage from historical encounters, or remnants of AI operations. Players would scan them down, assess their danger, and recover valuable materials. Some might be relatively accessible. Others could be guarded, contaminated, or located deep in hostile territory. ### Persistent battle aftermath Significant player-versus-player and player-versus-AI battles could leave discoverable salvage opportunities after the immediate encounter has ended. Following clearly defined ownership and recovery windows, abandoned battlefield materials could become available without automatic theft penalties. For technical efficiency, the game could consolidate abandoned wrecks into a smaller number of recoverable debris sites rather than preserve every wreck indefinitely. AI salvage crews might compete with players for these materials. The result is an entirely new set of opportunities for explorers, dedicated salvagers, industrialists, and small corporations. A major fleet battle could create economic activity long after the combatants leave. * * * ## 12. Contracts, Industry, and Player Participation The expansion should support participation beyond direct combat. NPC factions could offer contracts for reconnaissance, salvage recovery, hauling, manufacturing, military operations, and resource acquisition. Individual pilots might accept one-off missions or opt into ongoing contribution contracts that reward qualifying activity during a campaign. Corporations and alliances could compete for larger procurement and military contracts. For example, an empire faction might seek an organization capable of destroying a particular AI installation or delivering a large quantity of strategic materials. Offers could be evaluated according to price, capability, reliability, and completion requirements. Appropriate collateral, verification, and anti-abuse mechanisms would be necessary. The goal is to let industrial and logistical players influence the war in ways that are visible and economically meaningful. * * * ## 13. A Galaxy That Remains Accessible This expansion must not exist solely for established alliances. A four-person corporation establishing its first home should not suddenly face an AI Titan assault without warning or strategic justification. Regional military conditions, infrastructure, strategic importance, and credible AI logistics should determine which threats are possible. Smaller corporations should have opportunities to defend against manageable raids, discover valuable sites, intercept transports, salvage wrecks, and participate in larger campaigns. Established alliances should face threats proportionate to their strategic footprint, but not arbitrary punishment for being successful. The AI should not automatically scale to whatever fleet appears. Sometimes it should attack. Sometimes it should withdraw. Sometimes it should wait, gather intelligence, or pursue a different objective. Likewise, players who prefer ordinary highsec industry or exploration should retain predictable activities. Higher-risk opportunities should be available without forcing every player to participate. This is especially important for new players, casual pilots, and corporations still developing their infrastructure. * * * ## 14. A Practical Development Approach The full vision is ambitious and would likely require multiple releases. Rather than treating every feature as an all-or-nothing requirement, CCP could explore the concept through progressive development. **First: Resource and salvage prototypes** Test valuable frontier anomalies, specialized salvage discovery, and limited NPC competition over resource sites. **Second: Regional AI military campaigns** Introduce constrained AI logistics, recoverable warehouses, defeatable expeditionary forces, and meaningful territorial objectives. **Third: Persistent frontier regions** Establish the new civilization’s homeland, contested systems, military economy, and long-term operational behavior. **Fourth: Capital warfare and mobile FOB experiments** Evaluate expanded capital activities, siege objectives, the Utility Titan concept, and sustainable capital-production changes. **Fifth: Major invasion narrative and strategic isolation** Once the underlying systems are reliable, introduce larger offensives, strategic pylons, and the expansion’s defining narrative events. These are suggested development dependencies, not a required release order. CCP would determine what can realistically be built, tested, and maintained. A multi-year campaign should be supported by systems that remain enjoyable even during quieter periods. * * * ## 15. What Success Would Look Like Imagine a small corporation discovering a valuable resource pocket near its home. It organizes miners and a modest escort fleet. The operation succeeds, providing enough income to fund its next industrial project. Elsewhere, a larger corporation discovers an exceptionally valuable anomaly. It deploys an Orca-led mining operation, capital escorts, and a mobile logistics base. The AI identifies the concentration of resources and ships, then begins preparing an attack. CONCORD expeditionary forces decide whether the location justifies intervention. A battle follows. The defenders might win and recover substantial rewards. They might lose, leaving wreckage for independent salvagers and valuable equipment for AI recovery crews. Weeks later, another group might locate the warehouse containing the spoils of that battle. Meanwhile, an alliance launches a major expedition into the AI homeland. Its Combat Titans threaten a military fortress. Its Utility Titans sustain the assault. Haulers bring replacement equipment while reconnaissance fleets search for hostile reinforcements. The AI responds by attacking supply lines and deploying strategic isolation technology. The attackers must decide whether to complete the objective or withdraw before their expedition is cut off. Months or years later, the AI begins concentrating forces near an established player capital. The alliance notices the buildup, prepares its defenses, and rallies its members. Some players join to protect their home. Others join because the battle promises salvage, contracts, or an opportunity to weaken a rival. The outcome is not predetermined. And when the battle ends, New Eden remembers who fought, what was lost, and what was saved. That is the intended experience. Not another predictable NPC encounter. Not an enemy that exists only to be farmed. Not a mechanic designed to punish successful corporations. **A persistent civilization capable of giving players something extraordinary to fight for.** * * * ## Closing: An Invitation to Discussion This proposal is deliberately ambitious. Some elements may be too expensive to develop. Others may create economic or technical problems that require substantial redesign. Certain ideas—particularly unrestricted capital access, the destruction of major trade hubs, and system-wide isolation—deserve careful scrutiny. None of those individual features should prevent consideration of the broader concept. The central question is whether EVE Online could benefit from a persistent, strategically responsive NPC civilization that participates in territorial warfare, resource competition, logistics, industry, and the wider economy. I believe such a system could create new opportunities for players of every scale while reinforcing what makes EVE special: preparation, cooperation, risk, loss, recovery, and player-created history. I welcome disagreement, criticism, and alternative implementations. If a mechanic would damage existing gameplay, I would rather see it revised than defended simply because it was part of the original proposal. The objective is not to prescribe CCP’s development decisions. It is to present a direction worth exploring with the developers and the community. **Let players build something worth defending. Give them a credible enemy worth fighting. And make the victories and losses matter.** ---
**Author:** ![Dark\_Lord\_Trump](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/dark_lord_trump/32/411482_2.png) [@Dark\_Lord\_Trump](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Dark_Lord_Trump)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 9:27pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-online-the-new-eden-frontier-a-persistent-npc-invasion-living-warfront/520402/2 "2026-10-17T21:27:37Z")
We already did this with trigs. Take your AI slop away. ---
**Author:** ![Dravos](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/dravos/32/515164_2.png) [@Dravos](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Dravos)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 9:46pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-online-the-new-eden-frontier-a-persistent-npc-invasion-living-warfront/520402/3 "2026-10-17T21:46:20Z")
Just to clarify, this proposal is a collection of my own ideas, notes, and discussions I’ve had with other EVE players over time. I used AI to organize my scattered thoughts and refine the wording into something easier to read. As for the Triglavian Invasion, there are absolutely similarities, including lasting changes to New Eden and Pochven. I’m not denying that. The difference I’m proposing is a more involved NPC civilization with its own military logistics, resource competition, supply lines, and strategic campaigns that players can actively influence. It would build upon ideas EVE has already explored rather than simply repeat them. I’m not claiming to have all the answers. I just wanted to share some ideas and welcome constructive discussion about what could or couldn’t work. ---
**Author:** ![Wolfgang\_Jannesen](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/wolfgang_jannesen/32/496726_2.png) [@Wolfgang\_Jannesen](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Wolfgang_Jannesen)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 10:35pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-online-the-new-eden-frontier-a-persistent-npc-invasion-living-warfront/520402/4 "2026-10-17T22:35:56Z")
Get this AI trash out of here ---
**Author:** ![Dyver\_Phycad](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/dyver_phycad/32/358575_2.png) [@Dyver\_Phycad](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Dyver_Phycad)\ **Post date:** [October 18, 2026, 4:42am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-online-the-new-eden-frontier-a-persistent-npc-invasion-living-warfront/520402/5 "2026-10-18T04:42:22Z")
People who can’t think for and articulate themselves without the help of AI can be safely ignored.