# EVE will always be a nichè Game

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [March 8, 2021, 8:43am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186 "2021-03-08T08:43:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/geo_eclipse_oksaras/32/500781_2.png) [@Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Geo_Eclipse_Oksaras)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:30pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/21 "2021-03-08T15:30:31Z")

</div>

Alpha didn’t do anything to add to Alt Spam since you can’t log in with more than one alpha… those that are, are exploiting and breaking the rules…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kapacb-tapac_okyhb/32/260134_2.png) [@Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kapacb-Tapac_OkyHb)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:32pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/22 "2021-03-08T15:32:59Z")

</div>

Oh I tryed to fit gnosis with only cpu+ modules and hasnt any warnings, but had that lowsec warning and it was handy… And I was solo pve player so yes, it sucks at final count in game goodness. But maybe we can ask for two servers, 1-st for chickens and 2-nd for real EVE Capsuleers?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kapacb-tapac_okyhb/32/260134_2.png) [@Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kapacb-Tapac_OkyHb)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:41pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/23 "2021-03-08T15:41:09Z")

</div>

So you can learn important tips from this situation.  
You need speed up your socializing. And go make your school homework already, COME, LEARN!🤣  
No, really, you have to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inaken\_Huunuras](https://imageserver.eveonline.com/Character/1_512.jpg) [@Inaken\_Huunuras](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Inaken_Huunuras)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:58pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/24 "2021-03-08T15:58:12Z")

</div>

i think everyone playing this game is some kind of a introverted nerd or at least the majority

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kapacb-tapac_okyhb/32/260134_2.png) [@Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kapacb-Tapac_OkyHb)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 3:58pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/25 "2021-03-08T15:58:33Z")

</div>

Hey, I made billions only thankfully for exploiting game mechanics, its part of joyment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kapacb-tapac_okyhb/32/260134_2.png) [@Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kapacb-Tapac_OkyHb)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:09pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/26 "2021-03-08T16:09:53Z")

</div>

It is misconception at all. You can study it’s wronginess even from news in outgame internet, so much social based fusions in all that stories worthy of sir Arthur Conan Doyle… You just jump in chat and get your big story start, with trading, corporating, ganking cooperating, mining coop exploiting, all other fun part of multy player online game. That how it may works.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Dunning\_Kruger](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/the_dunning_kruger/32/414724_2.png) [@The\_Dunning\_Kruger](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/The_Dunning_Kruger)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:42pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/27 "2021-03-08T16:42:17Z")

</div>

I’m the counterpoint to that. CCP dumbed the game down and made it “more accessible” to the point where I’ve had enough. It’s been several years now since I’ve logged into the theme park and these days I don’t even frequent the forums anymore. It’s LAGL and Caturday every now and then, but hardly anything beyond that.

CCP effectively killed the game for me and I have no desire to ever come back. I can give you plenty names of other people who feel just like me and considering the ever dwindling active player numbers, I reckon people like me are the majority by a long shot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/geo_eclipse_oksaras/32/500781_2.png) [@Geo\_Eclipse\_Oksaras](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Geo_Eclipse_Oksaras)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:54pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/28 "2021-03-08T16:54:28Z")

</div>

Bannable too

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kapacb-tapac_okyhb/32/260134_2.png) [@Kapacb-Tapac\_OkyHb](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kapacb-Tapac_OkyHb)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 4:56pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/29 "2021-03-08T16:56:02Z")

</div>

Didnt brake the rules lol😋  
Post Update: there was some exploit chances with many alphas without rulecrossing.  
but still I didnt pay enough attention on your post first and did hastened answering, my mistake

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scoots\_Choco](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/scoots_choco/32/262262_2.png) [@Scoots\_Choco](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Scoots_Choco)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 5:02pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/30 "2021-03-08T17:02:20Z")

</div>

> [@Luwc](#):
>
> CCP is actively sabotaging the core playerbase, the only playerbase EVE actualy has.

[citation needed]  
Do you have actual numbers on this, or is the entire thing a “these changes make _me_ feel bad” thing? What even is the “core” playerbase?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cypherous](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cypherous/32/499883_2.png) [@Cypherous](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cypherous)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 7:07pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/31 "2021-03-08T19:07:34Z")

</div>

> [@Luwc](#):
>
> Slow but steadily this is being watered down

I agree with this part, EVE has been made more and more casual friendly over the years, i don’t think F2P is to blame, not really bothered by injectors either, its just the constant hand holding and changes that make it so players don’t have to read, only reason i don’t fall for jita scams is because i was raised on the escrow system where you had to carefully read everything to avoid scams, now people just get to look for big green or red text

I do miss EVE ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xuixien](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/xuixien/32/416896_2.png) [@Xuixien](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Xuixien)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:25pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/32 "2021-03-08T20:25:30Z")

</div>

> [@Luwc](#):
>
> By trying to make the game more accessable to the broader masses through skill injectors, extractors, SP sales, Expert Systems and babysitting such as a “safety green” button, CCP is actively sabotaging the core playerbase, the only playerbase EVE actualy has.

Here here!

I recently wrote about this on my blog:

> **[EVE Online's Dark Age](https://xuixiendares.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-end-of-era.html)**
>
>   The EVE of Old is Gone - And That's (Probably) Okay EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angr...

The TL;DR of this is that the early days of EVE Online was an “Age of Heroes” or an “Age of Mythology”, an exciting time full of the “first this” and the “first that”, when very few people understand how the game even worked and we have legends from Ye Times of Olde. But EVE Online is currently in a dark age - not from an in-game activity and economic perspective, but from a meta perspective - from the perspective of what EVE Online _is_ as a game.

The reason for this is three-fold: EVE’s playerbase is aging and moving on to other things. CCP is trying to appeal to new (read: younger) players, but a) the changes made are never enough to keep them in the game and, through Malcanis’ law, mostly benefit senior players and b) the changes made dilute the EVE Online experience and alienate the veterans who are already being lost to attrition.

Notable changes include making HiSec safer (via WarDec changes, “friendly fire” toggle, etc), changes to Rorquals, and skill injectors.

> [@Luwc](#):
>
> Slow but steadily this is being watered down, allowing the weak to flourish while the strong have their progress and repuation made meaningless by things such as skill injectors and FREE TO PLAY.

I would argue that the _extended trial period_ - forever - is probably either a net positive or a net neutral. It’s not something that veterans (to my knowledge, at least) can easily exploit since it would require multiple computers/virtual machines to run concurrent Alphas, and still risk a banhammer.

> [@Luwc](#):
>
> The decline of EVE started with free to play and was accelerated with SP Injectors.  
> That the Game was at its peak during the time when it was 100% subscription based and more exclusive seems to prove the point. That elitism and gatekeeping can be healthy to a Game.

Yes. The years between 2009-2015 were the ‘golden age’ of EVE Online. This was reflected, not just in my personal experience, but by the PCU numbers. 2009-2015 saw the highest population in the game. What changes were made during this time? The removal of learning skills, the removal of clone grades, a revamp to ship balance (starting with frigates, destroyers, and cruisers - the ships newbies would fly first), as well as the FW iteration that pulled thousands of new pilots into the game. Then CCP started making mistakes and trying to fix the mistakes with bandaids (which were further mistakes - what CCP should have done is _roll back changes that were mistakes_ and then iterate from there).

I would argue that the extended trial has less of an effect than things like skill injectors and increasing monetization.

> [@Luwc](#):
>
> There are games for the braindead masses and there are games for a nichè community.  
> EVE is the latter and by trying to bring in your average WOW Player that potentially only has interest for

I’m not sure there’s a correlation between IQ and game choice. I’ve met plenty of dumb people on EVE and some extraordinarily smart people on FPS games and WoW.

> [@God\_Emperor\_Kane](#):
>
> The ability to have an instant pilot at 100mil existed the minute you could trade characters and buy plex.

Yes, but this depended on the availability of the type of pilot you were looking for and the complete inability to totally customize the training. With injectors, if you want a Rorqual pilot you can inject a Rorqual pilot. Also, until recently, SP farming was a scaleable way of generating massive amounts of income in EVE. Training and selling characters, historically, not so much.

> [@Xanthellus](#):
>
> All these “back in the 1800s we all had Diphtheria, this newfangled thing called modern medicine is nonsense. Just be a man and die harder”, they’re hilarious and terrible.

You’re making the analogy that the changes made to EVE, because they’re _meant_ to “improve quality of life”, are similar to vaccinations. This is a false analogy. Not all change is good and not all progress moves is in a positive direction. The thing that drew people to EVE is _because_ they could die of Diphtheria.

* * *

EVE Online needs to return to it’s roots and go back to appealing to that niche gamer. Sure, it needs to do so in a modern way - but EVE needs to remain EVE.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xuixien](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/xuixien/32/416896_2.png) [@Xuixien](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Xuixien)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:26pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/33 "2021-03-08T20:26:23Z")

</div>

> [@Luwc](#):
>
> I would argue 50-75% were actual people. Rest was all Alts.

Actually something like 75% of players only have 1 account. 85% have 1-2 accounts. The remaining 15% have more than two accounts, and the distribution asymptotes from there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerard\_Amatin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gerard_amatin/32/481361_2.png) [@Gerard\_Amatin](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gerard_Amatin)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:32pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/34 "2021-03-08T20:32:20Z")

</div>

> [@Xuixien](#):
>
> Actually something like 75% of players only have 1 account. 85% have 1-2 accounts. The remaining 15% have more than two accounts, and the distribution asymptotes from there.

That doesn’t contradict the other statement. Even if the vast majority of players has no alts, if the people with alts have enough alts you could still have a situation where 50% of all characters online are alts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xuixien](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/xuixien/32/416896_2.png) [@Xuixien](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Xuixien)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:37pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/35 "2021-03-08T20:37:55Z")

</div>

> [@Gerard\_Amatin](#):
>
> That doesn’t contradict the other statement. Even if the vast majority of players has no alts, if the people with alts have enough alts you could still have a situation where 50% of all characters online are alts.

No.

If there’s 30,000 characters online, and 75% of players only have 1 account, then it means that on average, 22,500 of those 30,000 people are single accounts. That leaves the remaining 25% to consist of dual boxers or multiboxers. Also to consider is that not everyone who has multiple accounts plays them concurrently. We’re talking about characters online, not characters existing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerard\_Amatin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gerard_amatin/32/481361_2.png) [@Gerard\_Amatin](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gerard_Amatin)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:44pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/36 "2021-03-08T20:44:09Z")

</div>

Now you’re making a mistake. Multiboxers can have multiple alts.

Let’s say we have 200 characters online, 99% of the players has a single account. How many players is that?

Let’s fill these 200 characters with 100 players. 99 players with a single account, 1 player with 101 accounts.  
This results in a situation where 50% of characters online are alts, yet only 1% of the players has an alt. In this scenario, people with alts are _very rare_ (1%), yet every other character in space is an alt!

While this is an extreme example (it’s unlikely that so many people have no alts and one guy has so many alts), I hope this example makes clear that you cannot say ‘75% of people have no alts, so 75% of characters online must be single accounts’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xuixien](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/xuixien/32/416896_2.png) [@Xuixien](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Xuixien)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:49pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/37 "2021-03-08T20:49:24Z")

</div>

> [@Gerard\_Amatin](#):
>
> Multiboxers can have multiple alts.

Um, multiboxing **necessitates** alts. But I made the distinction between _dual boxers_ (2 accounts) and _multiboxers_ (2+ accounts).

> [@Gerard\_Amatin](#):
>
> Let’s fit these numbers with 100 players. 99 players with a single account, 1 player with 101 accounts. 50% of characters online is alts, yet only 1% of the players has an alt.

And the probability of of your completely made up scenario is nearly 0.

Your argument is basically “it _can_ happen in a completely made up scenario where I set the math up to prove myself right - therefore it’s happening”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerard\_Amatin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gerard_amatin/32/481361_2.png) [@Gerard\_Amatin](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gerard_Amatin)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:50pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/38 "2021-03-08T20:50:04Z")

</div>

It was an _example_ to point out your math was wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Xuixien](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/xuixien/32/416896_2.png) [@Xuixien](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Xuixien)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 8:57pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/39 "2021-03-08T20:57:44Z")

</div>

> [@Gerard\_Amatin](#):
>
> It was an _example_

That’s what I just said. It’s a made up scenario.

I’m talking about probabilities here. Do you know how probabilities work?

Maybe I phrased something wrong or explained it poorly.

If you have 30,000 characters online, and 75% of those belong to single account players, 10% belong to dual account players, and 15% belong to people with 3+ accounts, how does it work out 50% of those characters are alts when 75% are not? Gimme a break.

That would be 1,500 people with 2 accounts (3,000 characters), 22,500 people with 1 account (22,500 characters) the remaining (whatever number) down to 1 being a mix of people 3, 4, 5, etc. or a single person with 4,500 accounts.

Note that in your made up scenario the math is completely different and you set it up to work out a certain way. I’m talking about real numbers. In your hypothetical scenario you have 201 characters online. 100 of those characters belong to a players with 1 accounts, and 101 belong to a player with 101 accounts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerard\_Amatin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gerard_amatin/32/481361_2.png) [@Gerard\_Amatin](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gerard_Amatin)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2021, 9:02pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186/40 "2021-03-08T21:02:26Z")

</div>

It was just an example to show how your math is off.

The statement  
A. _75% of players have one account_  
is simply not the same as the statement  
B. _75% of all online characters belong to a player with one account._

That’s what I’m trying to point out with that example. It’s a hypothetical example, not meant to be an accurate representation, just an example scenario where the numbers for A and B are completely different.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/eve-will-always-be-a-niche-game/299186.md?page=3)
