# Formal complaint at Customs officers proceedings regarding attempted transfer of warclone blanks **URL:** \ **Category:** Intergalactic Summit\ **Tags:** pvp, planet-interaction\ **Created:** [March 24, 2023, 8:17pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295 "2023-03-24T20:17:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 5
**Author:** ![Synthetic\_Cultist](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/synthetic_cultist/32/388342_2.png) [@Synthetic\_Cultist](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Synthetic_Cultist)\ **Post date:** [June 24, 2024, 3:29pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/81 "2024-06-24T15:29:37Z")
Why are the Upwell workers all Bald ? This Confuses Me. ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [June 24, 2024, 4:54pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/82 "2024-06-24T16:54:57Z")
The leaked Chemal Tech [executive summary pamphlet](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/f/d/1/fd1ea739410bdde0e1d37b4972b719e3a63f972b.jpeg) for The Intaki Bank board mentions several physiological modifications. Let me mention a few - Radiation and toxins tolerance - Stress resistance - Immune system modifications - Standardized physical size - Metabolic flexibility with reduction of excesive energy intake requirements All the above, would impact delicate cellular skin structures responsible for hair growth in my opinion. Add to this all the complexity and cost of hair-grooming services spared that would be required for workforce masses. The bald and hairless is just cheaper 😔 ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [June 25, 2024, 9:27am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/83 "2024-06-25T09:27:27Z")
We are in Resbroko\[1\] still. Burning through warclone after warclone - it is hard work but very satisfying. Vanguards in Ardar\[2\] are being contained by the Empires. #### [Edit]2024-06-25T16:25:00Z Vanguards have moved to Amo _(Metropolis)_\[3\]. Our prototype warclone blanks tests continue there now. #### [Edit]2024-06-26T00:00:00Z It appears I was wrong when stating “Auviken is safe”. Two days before “normal” Vanguard activities started in Gal-Cal warzone, this message was received via Auviken VI Skyhook, apparently mentioning some sort of specops planned in Auviken: \*/transmission acquired\* _Origin: Embedded message via Equinox transfer relay shoh01/p6/Auviken/NAG/Citadel_ _Timestamp: 126.06.18.21.15.33.0217_ _//decrypt follows_ _Orientation phase complete with all components on standby._ _Launch group in position with no indication of detection on insertion._ _Asset CISCs matching finalized defense grid whitelist schedule confirmed._ _Strike group may proceed to primary action phase of Solstice at next window._ _/ends_ The log date above strangely coincides with the incident occurrence time mentioned in the recent Scope news piece discussed here briefly earlier on 18 June. And Vanguards **are** operating (covertly) on the planet’s surface in recovering of what appears to be Upwell research into possible three cloning methods for their clone workforce programme. Leaked reports recovered by mercenaries can be looked up [here](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/upwell-proposal-c-a-clone-pilots-musings) aka “Proposals A/B/C”. The Auviken VI Skyhook teter and nearby ships as seen from the surface of the planet - courtesy of my Zz source. ![WeatherGood01.PNG](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/3/e/2/3e2a50e1675600a619323dd9dc5ca232137e516c.jpeg) ![WeatherGood02.PNG](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/2/e/d/2ed8990399ea26a7e085971561a6cb7d3ecd47d9.jpeg) Meanwhile, we continue our work in Amo\[3:1\] hidden among Vanguard troops. #### [Edit]2024-06-26T18:11:00Z We moved our operations again. Now it’s in Hror _(Metropolis)_\[4\] a jump away from Amo\[3:2\]. “Weather conditions” are good. ![WeatherGood03.PNG](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/7/2/4/724e5f9c4b7f813cbfc154b767e48902883cceaf.jpeg) #### [Edit]2024-06-29T10:27:00Z Our activities have been relocated once again to take advantage of Vanguards cover. It’s 2 jumps from Hror\[4:1\] in Auner _(Metropolis)_\[5\] now. #### [Edit]2024-06-30T15:53:00Z Change of location to Ebolfer _(Metropoils)_\[6\], 5 jumps away from Auner\[5:1\]. #### [Edit]2024-06-30T19:43:00Z While running our physical tests of the prototype warclone blanks, we’ve come by a group of Vanguards performing a strange ritual. ![PhotoOp02.PNG](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/2/e/e/2ee7de8c36c45be6eac2ed803a49790c8d3895b5.jpeg) But it could also be just a group photo-op by the beach. #### [Edit]2024-07-01T14:24:00Z Tests are over, destination home now. Time to start thinking on that SCC application. * * * 1. Vanguards have added 1.241% (73.2% total) to corruption in Resbroko with no Empires suppression as of 2024-06-25T16:25:00Z 2. Vanguards have added 1.102% (100.0% total) to corruption in Ardar while Empires fight them there, adding 3.899% (14.5% total) to suppression as of 2024-06-01T14:24:00Z 3. Vanguards have added 0.333% (48.6% total) to corruption in Amo with no Empires suppression as of 2024-06-26T18:11:00Z 4. Vanguards have added 0.965% (73.2% total) to corruption in Hror with no Empires suppression as of 2024-06-29T10:27:00Z 5. Vanguards have added 0.527% (46.8% total) to corruption in Auner with no Empires suppression as of Invalid date 6. Vanguards have added 0.537% (4.3% total) to corruption in Ebolfer with no Empires suppression as of 2024-07-01T14:24:00Z ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [September 22, 2024, 12:35am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/84 "2024-09-22T00:35:29Z")
The time has come to contact SCC and apply for issuance of licenses for several technologies related to our Warclone Blanks prototypes. Below is the initial draft, to be refined yet. #### [Edit] 2024-09-23T17:33:00Z Updated **Direct and indirect income and tax projection from the sale of the industry** section. #### [Edit] 2024-10-02T06:51:00Z Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph. #### [Edit] 2024-10-14T21:36:00Z Updated **Practical applications of the industry, select use case scenarios** section. Added proposition of: - warclone blanks production regulation and public warclone blanks pools - warclone blank certificates infrastructure working the same way as PLEX infrastructure - the market identifier for warclone blank certificate - strategy for SCC to initially quickly populate public warclone blanks pools #### [Edit] 2024-10-17T21:32:00Z Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** table and graph. #### [Edit] 2024-10-24T10:08:00Z Updated **Purpose and justification for the industry being subject of the application** section. Point out the imminent threat of Deathless Circle rumored new SCARAB weapon. #### [Edit] 2024-10-28T00:45:00Z Updated **Purpose and justification for the industry being subject of the application** section. Added the SCARAB weapon system leaked stats breakdown. #### [Edit] 2024-11-10T12:56:00Z Updated **Practical applications of the industry, select use case scenarios** section. Added proposition of: - extending clone contracts included with Capsuleer license onto daily → monthly → yearly draw quotas of using public warclone blanks pools, free of charge. #### [Edit] 2024-11-10T17:21:00Z Updated **Purpose and justification for the industry being subject of the application** section. Added the statement of relinquishing exclusive right to license the technology. #### [Edit] 2024-11-21T10:49:00Z Updated **Purpose and justification for the industry being subject of the application** section. Added further propositions on distribution of BPOs/Schematics after licensing of the technology. Minor tidying up throughout the entire draft. #### Updated SCC application draft Updates continued [here…](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/87#p-2645869-updated-scc-application-draft-2) ---
**Author:** ![Kenaar](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kenaar/32/511606_2.png) [@Kenaar](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kenaar)\ **Post date:** [November 24, 2024, 1:03am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/85 "2024-11-24T01:03:00Z")
This project has most definitely peaked the interest of MR-TI I believe I will have to inform the board before I go ahead and reach out in a more formal way. ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [November 27, 2024, 8:16pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/86 "2024-11-27T20:16:37Z")
One of our associates at Fulcrum Station in Zarzakh System informed us of more planned operations involving mass scale deployment of Vanguard warclone mercenaries to planets in systems affected by Pirate Insurgencies. This time they are about to bring down planetary artillery with them, capable of shooting at ships in orbits. Leaked short combat drill clip attached below Apparently they are getting bolder… And scarier… ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/d/b/e/dbe0d83470690d867608817da8d7b06a6edab357.jpeg) The Zarzakh Legions are also supposed to conduct their operations in more organized way than before. They will begin to deploy teams of 9 warclones to planetary surfaces to conduct regular military operations aimed at planetary defenses. Starting tomorrow at noon. This looks bad but paradoxically might help convince SCC to our application having merit. And since we are past testing phase we won’t be deploying any test teams. Instead we plan to discretely dispatch observers equipped with our warclone blanks and provide the coverage to some degree. Bear with us, we are not _The Scope_ ha ha. We will continue working on our SCC application of course but not sooner than after things settle down. Hopefully around 9 December YC126, according to our source in Zarzakh. So prepare for the rough ride. Stay tuned as more updates will follow soon. #### [Edit] 2024-11-28T13:20:00Z Vanguards are wrecking havoc in Isie System (_Lonetrek_)\[1\]. Vanguards in Raihbaka System (_Black Rise_)\[2\] are being contained by the Empires. Both Systems are affected by Guristas Insurgency. #### [Edit] 2024-11-29T22:40:00Z Hostile Vanguards have moved to Innia System (_Black Rise_)\[3\]. Those in Raihbaka System (_Black Rise_)\[2:1\] are still being contained by the Empires. Angels have won theirs without any help from the Vanguard warclones. #### [Edit] 2024-11-30T10:11:00Z Vanguards have moved with their violence to Onnamon System (_Black Rise_)\[4\]. Those in Raihbaka System (_Black Rise_)\[2:2\] are still being contained by the Empires. Angels have won theirs without any help from the Vanguard warclones. Meanwhile our source at Zz warns of Cartel is in preparation to another strike at 2024-12-01T04:27:00Z #### [Edit] 2024-11-30T19:24:00Z It seems there is some comms issue in regards to reporting ground troops progress. Might be caused by recently increased Drifters activity around the Trustbreaker Arrays deployed by the Deathless. Add to this the new Mercenary Dens that might be clogging FTL networks with those encrypted infomorphs being stolen from Upwell and transmitted to The Warden structure in Zarzakh. The Communication Relay Committee will have their hands busy investigating it. They better put en effort in that. #### [Edit] 2024-12-01T18:14:00Z Warclones have swept briefly through Kehjari System (_Black Rise_)\[5\] and then moved to Eha System (_Black Rise_)\[6\]. Cartel’s Insurgency seems to struggle with picking up the pace …thankfully. #### [Edit] 2024-12-01T21:10:00Z Vanguards are pounding ground in Pavanakka System (_Black Rise_)\[7\] now. Watch your spice. #### [Edit] 2024-12-02T17:54:00Z Deathless warclones moved to Uuhulanen System (_Black Rise_)\[8\]. But they are having tough time there. Meanwhile information blockade has been fixed as the Trustbreaker Arrays are no longer being deployed by the Deathless and we have now reports coming back from Raihbaka System\[2:3\] again. #### [Edit] 2024-12-04T09:24:00Z Vanguard warclones are still present in Raihbaka\[2:4\] and Uuhulanen\[8:1\] Systems. It’s strange to see them fighting each other on both sides. #### [Edit] 2024-12-04T12:24:00Z Vanguard warclones present in Raihbaka\[2:5\] System are again having problems with their comms as progress reports have stopped coming in. Those in Uuhulanen\[8:2\] System have slowed down their pace apparently. #### [Edit] 2024-12-05T13:07:00Z Vanguards in Raihbaka\[2:6\] System are continuing to have communication problems. Our observers confirm they are still there but no progress reports are available for the time being. Those in Uuhulanen\[8:3\] System, moved to Elonaya System (_Lonetrek_)\[9\] now. Our associate from Zarzakh has informed us of the Deathless Circle’s decision to extend their ground offensive and Vanguard Warclones deployments until 12th December - formerly rumored to end on 9th Dec. #### [Edit] 2024-12-05T19:07:00Z It appears our observers got confused and lost their vigilance. It’s unbelievable they missed whole deployment of Empire ground forces moving to Ohbochi System (_Lonetrek_)\[10\] in pursue of vile warclones! But the Empires ground troops are still behind in Elonaya\[9:1\] System. #### [Edit] 2024-12-05T21:27:00Z We’ve added reports history to the footnotes for each system mentioned where hostile Vanguards and forces suppressing them were operating. We conducted a quick investigation to establish the cause of the incorrect and incomplete reports. Conclusion is it was a human error. We’ve put new verification procedures in place to prevent similar mishaps in the future. Once again we apologise sincerely for the confusion that might has been caused. As of now same two systems mentioned in previous update are stil being affected by Vanguards. #### [Edit] 2024-12-06T13:51:00Z Plot twist. Warclones have spilled into Cartel Insurgency systems. Now they are present in both warzone interfering with BIG 4 simultaneously. They are now present in Gulmorogod System\[11\] (_Heimatar_), Dammalin System\[12\] (_Heimatar_). The Guristas have ceased they activities at the moment. #### [Edit] 2024-12-07T22:18:00Z Deathless ground troops relocated to Vard System\[13\] (_Heimatar_). Some are still present in Gulmorogod System\[11:1\]. Meanwhile, Comando Guri forces are preparing to strike again 2024-12-08T03:26:00Z in Old Man Star System (_Essence_). #### [Edit] 2024-12-08T15:41:00Z Vanguards are now being actively suppressed in Egmar System\[14\] (_Metropolis_), others continue their progress in Vard System\[13:1\]. Guristas are yet to wait for warclones ground support. #### [Edit] 2024-12-09T19:32:00Z Arnher System\[15\] (_Metropolis_) is now being pestered by Vanguard warclones. Egmar System\[14:1\], next gate, is coping with them so far. #### [Edit] 2024-12-10T21:10:00Z Anti Vanguard troops are now deployed by Empires to Lulm System\[16\] (_Heimatar_). Arnher\[15:1\] is still beeing occupied by Vanguard gangs. #### [Edit] 2024-12-12T10:45:00Z Vanguards are rumored to cease their activity in about 1 hour. They still do what they can in Lulm \[16:1\] and Arnher\[15:2\] Systems. There is supposed to be some kind of transmission related to the present Vanguard deployment progress in about 30 minutes. Our team of observers is trying to secure an access to it. Stay tuned. #### [Edit] 2024-12-12T12:56:00Z So the transmission just assured the current Vanguard deployment is over …and that it will repeat in the near future. Many times. So again, we are in dire need of a mean to be able to directly confront Vanguards ourselves. And as you could see, the Empires, with Mordu’s Legion warclone hands couldn’t handle the plague very efficiently. They won’t be physically able to help us all when mass Vanguard raids begin to happen at planetary installations through the cluster. Hence our R&D effort and commitment to bring the case before SCC and be able to defend ourselves. We are now going back to the SCC application draft. * * * 1. Vanguards have added 12.000% (100.0% total) to corruption in Isie with no Empires suppression as of 2024-11-30T23:36:00Z - was 12.000% (91.5%) on 2024-11-29T19:32:00Z - was 12.000% (81.2%) on 2024-11-29T09:22:00Z - was 5.000% (47.4%) on 2024-11-28T19:20:00Z - was 0.800% (31.9%) on 2024-11-28T13:20:00Z 2. Vanguards are being suppressed in Raihbaka while Empires fight them there, adding 55.400% (70.0% total) to suppression as of 2024-12-05T08:16:00Z - was 55.400% (70.0%) on 2024-12-04T12:24:00Z - was 55.400% (70.0%) on 2024-12-04T09:24:00Z - was 49.400% (64.0%) on 2024-12-03T15:12:00Z - was 48.000% (62.6%) on 2024-12-03T08:51:00Z - was 44.400% (58.6%) on 2024-12-02T22:59:00Z - was 41.600% (55.8%) on 2024-12-02T18:38:00Z - was 41.0% (55.2%) on 2024-12-02T17:54:00Z - was 40.0% (54.2%) on 2024-12-02T08:21:00Z - was 40.0% (52.4%) on 2024-11-30T18:27:00Z - was 40.0% (52.4%) on 2024-11-30T18:27:00Z - was 40.0% (52.0%) on 2024-11-30T10:11:00Z - was 40.0% (52.0%) on 2024-11-29T22:40:00Z - was 0.0% (48.7%) on 2024-11-29T19:32:00Z (incomplete reports!) - was 0.0% (34.5%) on 2024-11-29T09:22:00Z (incomplete reports!) - was 0.0% (13.5%) on 2024-11-28T19:20:00Z (incomplete reports!) - was 0.0% (10.5%) on 2024-11-28T13:20:00Z (incomplete reports!) 3. Vanguards have added 29.400% (100.0% total) to corruption in Innia with no Empires suppression as of 2024-11-30T23:36:00Z - was 29.400% (79.6.4%) on 2024-11-30T10:11:00Z - was 29.400% (79.6.4%) on 2024-11-30T09:57:00Z - was 21.800% (52.2.4%) on 2024-11-29T22:40:00Z - was 16.800% (46.4%) on 2024-11-29T19:32:00Z - was 7.400% (23.4%) on 2024-11-29T09:22:00Z 4. Vanguards have added 23.200% (70.2% total) to corruption in Onnamon with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-01T09:58:00Z - was 21.000% (67.7%) on 2024-11-30T23:38:00Z - was 15.600% (57.3%) on 2024-11-30T19:27:00Z - was 15.200% (56.9%) on 2024-11-30T18:33:00Z - was 5.200% (44.6.4%) on 2024-11-30T10:11:00Z - was 5.200% (44.6.4%) on 2024-11-30T09:57:00Z 5. Vanguards have added 9.800% (100.0% total) to corruption in Kehjari with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-02T08:20:00Z - was 9.800% (83.4%) on 2024-12-01T18:14:00Z - was 9.800% (75.9%) on 2024-12-01T14:54:00Z 6. Vanguards have added 11.200% (94.7% total) to corruption in Eha with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-02T08:20:00Z - was 11.200% (71.9%) on 2024-12-01T21:10:00Z - was 7.800% (83.4%) on 2024-12-01T18:14:00Z - was 3.000% (54.7%) on 2024-12-01T14:54:00Z 7. Vanguards have added 11.800% (74.8% total) to corruption in Pavanakka with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-02T17:54:00Z - was 8.600% (59.0%) on 2024-12-02T11:46:00Z - was 7.200% (52.8%) on 2024-12-02T08:20:00Z - was 0.800% (37.5%) on 2024-12-01T21:10:00Z 8. Vanguards have added 26.000% (70.1% total) to corruption in Uuhulanen with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-05T13:07:00Z - was 25.800% (69.9%) on 2024-12-05T08:16:00Z - was 22.400% (64.2%) on 2024-12-04T21:57:00Z - was 19.400% (57.1%) on 2024-12-04T12:24:00Z - was 19.200% (55.1%) on 2024-12-04T09:24:00Z - was 14.600% (40.3%) on 2024-12-03T15:12:00Z - was 13.200% (31.9%) on 2024-12-03T08:51:00Z - was 8.800% (24.7%) on 2024-12-02T22:59:00Z - was 2.400% (17.1%) on 2024-12-02T18:38:00Z - was 1.000% (15.7%) on 2024-12-02T17:54:00Z 9. Vanguards have added 6.200% (30.6% total) to corruption in Elonaya with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-06T13:51:00Z - was 6.200% (30.6%) on 2024-12-06T09:28:00Z - was 4.400% (8.8%) on 2024-12-05T22:14:00Z - was 3.400% (7.8%) on 2024-12-05T21:27:00Z - was 2.400% (6.2%) on 2024-12-05T19:17:00Z - was 1.400% (5.0%) on 2024-12-05T17:06:00Z - was 0.400% (3.2%) on 2024-12-05T13:07:00Z 10. Vanguards are being suppressed in Ohbochi while Empires fight them there, adding 14.600% (35.5% total) to suppression as of 2024-12-06T13:51:00Z - was 14.600% (35.5%) on 2024-12-06T09:28:00Z - was 14.000% (34.9%) on 2024-12-05T22:14:00Z - was 13.600% (34.5%) on 2024-12-05T21:27:00Z - was 11.200% (32.1%) on 2024-12-05T19:17:00Z 11. Vanguards are being suppressed in Gulmorogod while Empires fight them there, adding 36.400% (77.6% total) to suppression as of 2024-12-11T18:08:00Z - was 36.400% (72.0%) on 2024-12-09T22:38:00Z - was 36.400% (71.0%) on 2024-12-09T10:45:00Z - was 36.400% (70.5%) on 2024-12-08T15:41:00Z - was 35.200% (69.2%) on 2024-12-07T22:18:00Z - was 12.800% (46.8%) on 2024-12-06T23:12:00Z - was 8.400% (42.4%) on 2024-12-06T18:41:00Z - was 5.200% (39.1%) on 2024-12-06T13:51:00Z 12. Vanguards have added 34.000% (70.2% total) to corruption in Dammalin with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-11T18:08:00Z - was 34.000% (70.2%) on 2024-12-07T22:18:00Z - was 16.800% (51.3%) on 2024-12-06T23:12:00Z - was 8.000% (41.8%) on 2024-12-06T18:41:00Z - was 4.800% (34.8%) on 2024-12-06T13:51:00Z 13. Vanguards have added 28.400% (60.8% total) to corruption in Vard with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-11T18:08:00Z - was 28.400% (47.8%) on 2024-12-09T22:38:00Z - was 28.400% (44.8%) on 2024-12-09T19:32:00Z - was 27.600% (38.0%) on 2024-12-09T10:45:00Z - was 24.400% (32.9%) on 2024-12-08T23:20:00Z - was 22.400% (22.4%) on 2024-12-08T19:09:00Z - was 18.800% (22.0%) on 2024-12-08T15:41:00Z - was 5.600% (6.4%) on 2024-12-07T22:18:00Z 14. Vanguards are being suppressed in Egmar while Empires fight them there, adding 34.000% (75.4% total) to suppression as of 2024-12-12T12:56:00Z - was 34.000% (75.4%) on 2024-12-12T10:45:00Z - was 34.000% (70.9%) on 2024-12-11T18:08:00Z - was 34.000% (70.1%) on 2024-12-10T21:10:00Z - was 29.200% (64.9%) on 2024-12-10T10:21:00Z - was 23.600% (56.8%) on 2024-12-09T22:38:00Z - was 21.600% (54.5%) on 2024-12-09T19:32:00Z - was 17.600% (50.5%) on 2024-12-09T10:45:00Z - was 12.800% (45.1%) on 2024-12-08T23:20:00Z - was 8.800% (41.1%) on 2024-12-08T19:09:00Z - was 6.000% (38.4%) on 2024-12-08T15:41:00Z 15. Vanguards have added 24.800% (78.0% total) to corruption in Arnher with no Empires suppression as of 2024-12-12T12:56:00Z - was 24.800% (77.1%) on 2024-12-12T10:45:00Z - was 17.200% (56.2%) on 2024-12-11T18:08:00Z - was 10.000% (26.4%) on 2024-12-10T21:10:00Z - was 7.600% (16.8%) on 2024-12-10T10:21:00Z - was 5.600% (8.6%) on 2024-12-09T22:38:00Z - was 3.600% (5.6%) on 2024-12-09T19:32:00Z 16. Vanguards are being suppressed in Lulm while Empires fight them there, adding 17.600% (42.2% total) to suppression as of 2024-12-12T12:56:00Z - was 15.200% (39.2%) on 2024-12-12T10:45:00Z - was 9.600% (30.7%) on 2024-12-11T18:08:00Z - was 1.600% (22.5%) on 2024-12-10T21:10:00Z ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [December 19, 2024, 7:23pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/87 "2024-12-19T19:23:59Z")
We are now back to SCC application paperwork preparation #### [Edit] 2024-12-19T19:14:00Z Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph. #### Updated SCC application draft Updates continued [here…](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/91#p-2690133-updated-scc-application-draft-1) ---
**Author:** ![Kenaar](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/kenaar/32/511606_2.png) [@Kenaar](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Kenaar)\ **Post date:** [December 19, 2024, 9:05pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/88 "2024-12-19T21:05:13Z")
I hope you have the opportunity to review my mail, no rush on the response these things can take serious consideration. I am delighted to see that you are still hard at work. ---
**Author:** ![Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/lauralite_anne_brezia/32/380065_2.png) [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Lauralite_Anne_Brezia)\ **Post date:** [December 20, 2024, 2:39am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/89 "2024-12-20T02:39:23Z")
Sometimes, with this insistency about customs codes and the like, I often wonder if you’ve been introduced to the concept of surface to orbit cargo ferry shuttles and dropships, and their _quite legal_ usage to ferry personnel and some materials on and off colonial infrastructures. As It happens, as well, it is rather bold to presume an attempted monopoly patent for your designs, when even the supposedly Genolution style blanks are not a wholly proprietary system as it were and even were not so at the height of the warlords era, what with hundreds of independent clone fabs producing combat grade blanks and selling them in bulk for packaging by Genolution, each with their own genericized and specific processes. I’d also argue, that even if the abover were not the case, your proposed patent and use case is too broad for actual applicability. as a stable singular patent. Especially when a multitude of competing Standards exist for combat grade blanks across the cluster, both from the various Empire aligned entities, and Independents, not just Genolution, that largely remain minimally regulated. You seem to further have the understanding that the Secure Commerce Commission controls and regulates every minutia and specific of strategic material reserves and BPO usage(when such things are more closely handled by the Empires and their Security Aparatuses than the SCC itself)…, and that they actively and openly share their transaction details in full with the rest of the CONCORD agencies, even though they are notoriously secretive about customer transactional data through SCC tracked markets even when questioned by the rest of CONCORD, as, being a relatively neutral trade regulatory entity, if they did actually share that data, they’d lose that status as a relatively neutral trade regulatory entity. I continue to commend the efforts and work that goes into this project of yours, however some of the presumptions give me pause on it’s long term prognosis - Revision Addendum: It’s notable that, the SCC while keeping track of various patents and specific print modifications, they’re often largely tracking patents filed and struck with the various patent offices of each of the four Empires themselves, and not usually filing and classifying the patents themself. Additional, tradability on SCC tracked markets does not equate to legality. Matigu Sushi is often bought in significant bulk but is, on the whole not tradable in quantity on SCC markets, and similarly the Khanid Works upgraded Capsule Specification used by some pilots and heavily advertised by KW is also on the whole not tradable on SCC markets yet the licensures are bought quite legally ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [December 20, 2024, 4:10pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/90 "2024-12-20T16:10:45Z")
Thank you for your concern and willingness to provide helpful advice. I appreciate it very much. Please, let me address some of them below. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > I often wonder if you’ve been introduced to the concept of surface to orbit cargo ferry shuttles and dropships, and their _quite legal_ usage to ferry personnel and some materials on and off colonial infrastructures. Yes we use the cargo launch facilities at our planetary installations - from time to time and all of the facilities are equipped with three launchpads, on average. It gives us three launch windows to launch cargo three times more often of course but it’s stiil not enough volume wise compared to POCO (or Skyhook in your case I suppose) transfers. I suppose you operate out of CONCORD controlled space and maybe you are less constrained in regards of planetary imports bypassing Skyhooks but in our case it’s different. We operate in CONCORD space and planetary imports bypassing POCOs are illegal. We could lose our planetary operations permits if we tried to circumvent those rules. We know how …but it’s still on a very small scale. Hence we need to find a legal way out of this to go bulk. I hope you understand. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > it is rather bold to presume an attempted monopoly patent for your designs No, we are not striving for monopoly on warclone blanks production. We like InterStellar Kredits but we are not greedy. In the following SCC application draft [update](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/84#p-2595148-edit-date2024-11-10-time172100-timezoneutc-8), we explicitly relinquished our claim to any IP royalties after technology is accepted for industry use: > Moreover we do not seek an exclusive right on licensing the technology being the subject of the application. Firstly because it is a derivative secondly because we want it shared amongst the entrepreneuring Capsuleers and proliferate. and [here](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/84#p-2595148-edit-date2024-11-21-time104900-timezoneutc-9) to propose SCC provides free BPO copy to any capsuleer who docks Yulai III - Moon 1 - Secure Commerce Commission Depository Station: > We would like then to deposit the technology BPO and Schematics at Yulai III - Moon 1 - Secure Commerce Commission Depository Station for every Capsuleer to claim their free copy, from their hangar upon docking. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > multitude of competing Standards exist for combat grade blanks across the cluster, both from the various Empire aligned entities, and Independents, not just Genolution, that largely remain minimally regulated Exactly, the point of the SCC application for _our standard_ is to “blaze the trail”, so to speak, for _all other standards_ so they could come out of the obscurity status and into the broad Market. There are already BPO _variants_ for many existing technologies. I can’t see why it shouldn’t be the same for warclone blanks. Like _Tetrimonic Warclone Blanks_ emerging recently. Or _Shriker Warclone Blanks_ found in those infamous _SCARAB Breacher Pods_. The purpose is the same while the principles of operation, field durability, specific task assignment affinity and production stats may differ. We will gladly include all other standards in our SCC application, and cover the time and material costs, should the interested parties provided us with the required details for paperwork. If others are not interested at the moment, it would still be easier for them to license their own warclone blanks variants later in the future should the SCC agreed to our application at hand. Also, we are aware our prototypes could compare poorly against other builds in a given type of task while excel in some other. We do not claim ultimate superiority. We simply strive to claim our Capsuleer right to defend against an emerging rogue warclone threat in the only possible way - by using same force projection vector - warclones. In broad daylight. We claim it for all of us. One can only reject it at their own peril. There is no way of stopping Deathless Vanguard warclones anymore. We can only prepare for what is coming. In a matter of months. To wrap thing up on the lighter note - we plan to run the signature gathering campaign at a later date, when all the SCC application details are ready for submission, to file “Capsuleers Endorsements” appendix to the SCC application form. We hope to see your signature there. ---
**Author:** ![Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/lauralite_anne_brezia/32/380065_2.png) [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Lauralite_Anne_Brezia)\ **Post date:** [December 20, 2024, 6:23pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/91 "2024-12-20T18:23:52Z")
> [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > I suppose you operate out of CONCORD controlled space and maybe you are less constrained in regards of planetary imports bypassing Skyhooks but in our case it’s different. We operate in CONCORD space and planetary imports bypassing POCOs are illegal. We could lose our planetary operations permits if we tried to circumvent those rules. We know how …but it’s still on a very small scale. Hence we need to find a legal way out of this to go bulk. I hope you understand. I’m going to touch on this in particular, ‘CONCORD Controlled Space’ is a very narrow band and constellation in the Genesis region, anywhere else CONCORD operates is _in the jurisdictional control_ of the Empires themselves. Therein, legality of what is and is not appropriate to bypass POCOs for imports is down to those jurisdictions, and in many cases, subjurisdictions such as system administrations or even planetary or planetary regional authorities. I have extensive operational experience both within and without the letter of various legal frameworks for import and export and deployment in Empire space. Much of both well documented, in particular in regard to the Systems of Eugales, Archavoinet, Lirsautton, Skarkon before its invasion and control by the Triglavian, Osmallanais and more. Just in those particular cases if we want to go with your definition of CONCORD Space, I and others affiliated with myself have yet to lose our operational licensures for operations for bypassing POCOs. Mainly because methods and manners are _jurisdictionally dictated_ and agreements with local planetary and system administrations go a long way in creating and specifying legality. In Eugales in particular, being the enforcer of a System of Interest claim by a neighbouring system memberstate, and it’s interesting status as an Unorganized/Unincorporated System gave a great deal of operational latitude. > [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > Exactly, the point of the SCC application for _our standard_ is to “blaze the trail”, so to speak, for _all other standards_ so they could come out of the obscurity status and into the broad Market. There are already BPO _variants_ for many existing technologies. I can’t see why it shouldn’t be the same for warclone blanks. Like _Tetrimonic Warclone Blanks_ emerging recently. Or _Shriker Warclone Blanks_ found in those infamous _SCARAB Breacher Pods_. And on this, I’ll say that your presumption that these standards are in obscurity, because they’re not on Capsuleer accessible SCC Markets or parts of SCC markets, and the continuing seeming claim that it makes their use and deployments illegal, very shortsighted but very… Capsuleer all the same. This narrow lensing I think is likely the disconnect point in your rationale. There are myriad methods and options of legal and illicit engagement with various industries and non-capsuleer entities and operations beyond the SCC and CONCORD. I’d comment more on the remainder, however I have superseding business to attend to. ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [March 19, 2025, 6:37pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/92 "2025-03-19T18:37:14Z")
We continue SCC application paperwork preparation Updated **Purpose and justification for the industry being subject of the application** section - addressed sc. _Drifter Crisis_ in conjunction of using Warclone Blanks to counter it. Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph. #### [Edit] 2025-04-01T21:11:00Z **Purpose and justification for the industry being subject of the application** - addressed existence of other warclone blanks technology variants and their complementary nature relative to the technology described in the application #### [Edit] 2025-06-21T20:24:00Z Updated **Technical details of the industry** - added ATP amount consumption levels data Updated **Direct and indirect income and tax projection from the sale of the industry** - added P1 commodities summary in schematics Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph #### [Edit] 2025-07-10T16:44:00Z Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph #### [Edit] 2025-08-11T08:04:00Z If you’ve missed the _rumor_, there is another surge in Vanguards warclones (or cloned soldiers) activity expected on 2025-09-16T12:00:00Z→2025-10-02T12:00:00Z. There is even a code name for it - _ **Operation Nemesis** _ Though, no certainty of who exactly is going to be behind it. Even stranger times ahead of us… We might try to sneak in and test some more of our improved warclone blanks. #### [Edit] 2025-08-15T18:10:00Z This communication was leaked yesterday by a source close to CONCORD: > The Deathless Circle are making some big movements. They’re moving towards building something that is going to be a game changer in the New Eden. > > Certain organizations are starting to find out that these things are being constructed and that actually the Deathless Circle is more organized than they thought. > > There is High Table of the Deathless Circle and this organizational structure is something that is going to be really important in time to come. What they’re building is going to be a key player in how Vanguards will exist in years to come. > > Operation Nemesis will offer expeditions for the willing so they can start helping that. It will feed into the early parts of the structures. By completing these expeditions or either helping the Deathless Circle in gathering the resources that they might need in a certain operation. > > SARO will try to find help and implant someone within The High Table at the Deathless Circle. #### [Edit] 2025-09-11T19:14:00Z Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph in the SCC application draft below. More details has appeared of, once again, increased Vanguard warclones activity coming upon us. Supposedly, their main focus is on Upwell’s planetary operations across New Eden and securing whatever corporate secrets and materials they can get out of them. It will then be sent into dead drop locations in the orbit to be picked up by clandestine convoys. Sounds like an opportunity for making some ransom ISK.. #### Updated SCC application draft Updates continued [here…](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/95#p-2785260-updated-scc-application-draft-1) ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [October 14, 2025, 4:22pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/95 "2025-10-14T16:22:52Z")
Updated **Purpose and justification…** section with recently concluded Operation Nemesis outcome summary. Added mention of Upwell’s cybernetic research program fiasco resulting in the _Hollow Clones Outbreak_. Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph in the SCC application draft below. #### Updated SCC application draft Updates continued [here…](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/96#p-2794633-updated-scc-application-draft-1) ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [November 7, 2025, 5:28pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/96 "2025-11-07T17:28:41Z")
Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph in the SCC application draft below. #### Updated SCC application draft Updates continued [here…](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/101#p-2824858-updated-scc-application-draft-1) ---
**Author:** ![Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/lauralite_anne_brezia/32/380065_2.png) [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Lauralite_Anne_Brezia)\ **Post date:** [November 7, 2025, 5:47pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/97 "2025-11-07T17:47:28Z")
I see you’re still trying to disrupt an industry and market that uses multiple standard formats by… trying to introduce another standard, that will at best see niche adoption for specific sub-markets instead of being an all-range material replacement. Your tenacity in it is noted, at least. But most of your proposed upgrades are instead sidegrades to the solutions that are used in other clonesoldier formats. Better in certain applications or circumstance, but not better for all. I think your point of failure was, and continues to be the belief that this will see a universal or near universal adoption system because of your efforts for multicompatibility, while not taking the time to consider why various clonesoldier clone formats are in use and for what they’re in use for. For instance you seem intent on the idea of limited ATP supply and prevention of re-uptake to limit AWOL runoff, but fail to consider that the reason many clonesoldier blank formats include a functional digestive and metabolic system is because clonesoldiers, both mercenary and direct empire military, are often enough deployed as garrison forces and need to function for longer than just direct deployment conditions. Of course you have a ‘solution’ for that too, by creating the problem in the first place. Further still, you continue to act like Genolution is the only supplier of warclone blanks… they aren’t. That’d be like saying Cromeaux are the only supplier of Capsuleer clone blanks. You also continue to have the misapprehension that public Capsuleer accessible SCC markets are the only SCC markets in operation and only way to ‘legally’ trade or have access to anything… ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2025, 8:10pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/98 "2025-11-08T20:10:55Z")
> [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > I see you’re still trying to disrupt an industry and market that uses multiple standard formats by… trying to introduce another standard, that will at best see niche adoption for specific sub-markets instead of being an all-range material replacement. > > Your tenacity in it is noted, at least. Well, thank you! > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > But most of your proposed upgrades are instead sidegrades to the solutions that are used in other clonesoldier formats. Better in certain applications or circumstance, but not better for all. > > I think your point of failure was, and continues to be the belief that this will see a universal or near universal adoption system because of your efforts for multicompatibility, while not taking the time to consider why various clonesoldier clone formats are in use and for what they’re in use for. All technological progress is done by breaking up with old patterns to adapt to new circumstances. Older formats, still in use are no threat to our technology, nor is ours meant to replace them. But rather to complement where it’s lacking, like mobility and portability. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > For instance you seem intent on the idea of limited ATP supply and prevention of re-uptake to limit AWOL runoff, but fail to consider that the reason many clonesoldier blank formats include a functional digestive and metabolic system is because clonesoldiers, both mercenary and direct empire military, are often enough deployed as garrison forces and need to function for longer than just direct deployment conditions. Of course you have a ‘solution’ for that too, by creating the problem in the first place. What problem? Disrupting your operations perhaps? Is this what it’s all about? Deal with it. This is New Eden. Barracks infrastructure require higher population of warclone infomorphs in all locations owned by the Capsuleer. It also incur higher operational costs, just to provide a physical comfort to active warclones while they are idle. This proposed warclone technology variant is for Capsuleers by Capsuleers, not for warclones’ leisure time. It is meant to be leased to warclone infomorph for the duration of the job. No barracks infrastructure is necessary as the NIS transfer happens right when active warclone is needed. It’s built around minimizing operational costs. Our approach allows for hiring a minimal warclone infomorphs population, residing in any virtuality hub, and transferring them in the blink where they are needed and where the warclone blanks are ready to receive them. With proposed warclone blanks banks network across New Eden, rapid delivery of additional warclone blanks, if needed, is possible at minimal cost. AWOL incidents will happen no matter the technology is used. Acts of theft or insubordination are unavoidable. Our tech approach is to minimize the number of incidents by making the warclone body mostly inconvenient to use, when unauthorized. The price for the informorph, could most probably be reputation loss and as a result hard time to get a legitimate job in some areas. By controlling the warclone blank location and activation time, the Capsuleer is in full control of the moment, location and duration of the warclone informorph entering the physical theater of operation that is the sole domain of that Capsuleer. Since all the warclone blanks are homogeneous, with identical motoric parameters, infomorphs may very quickly adjusts their “muscle memories” with minimal discomfort after few deployments or quick training. We may also later offer infomorph services allowing quick updates of the imprint motoric memory data to adjust for ours, or anyone else’s body standard. Research is ongoing in that regard. Same approach as ours, in regards to warclone blanks logistics and warclone infomorphs deployment is already used by the Deathless Circle. They don’t seem to maintain barracks but rather their infomorphs reside in the Fulcrum Virtuality when not in the warbarges and readying for deployments. I think it’s far more efficient than an old model of keeping active, physical personel, at all times. This is what our technology proposal is aiming to replicate. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > Further still, you continue to act like Genolution is the only supplier of warclone blanks… they aren’t. That’d be like saying Cromeaux are the only supplier of Capsuleer clone blanks. We haven’t heard of any other big corporation that produces warclone blanks for mass sale. And it seems like Genelution stopped supplying warclone blanks in bulk since last year. I saw no replacement for it other than by The Order of St. Tetrimon. Also, since when a corporation must explain why it pursues business opportunity with particular other corporation. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > You also continue to have the misapprehension that public Capsuleer accessible SCC markets are the only SCC markets in operation and only way to ‘legally’ trade or have access to anything… Well yes, prove me wrong. In order to operate Planetary Industry ‘legally’ **and efficiently** , you need to do it in a proper way. Otherwise you may be limited to petty smuggle if you want to bypass it. You may own a Planetary Customs Office, but there _may_ still be Customs Officers present aboard watching. Sure, they can be grafted handsomely but still, some SCC paperwork is necessary to clear the freight. By the way, is your planetary development in MHC-R3 System prepared for Deathless Circle invasion? We might be of assistance here if you run out of your warclone blanks. ---
**Author:** ![Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/lauralite_anne_brezia/32/380065_2.png) [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Lauralite_Anne_Brezia)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2025, 10:47am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/99 "2025-11-17T10:47:04Z")
> [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > Disrupting your operations perhaps? Is this what it’s all about? Deal with it. This is New Eden. Said like a petulant pseudo-immortal sure of his superiority. > [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > Barracks infrastructure require higher population of warclone infomorphs in all locations owned by the Capsuleer. It also incur higher operational costs, just to provide a physical comfort to active warclones while they are idle. > > This proposed warclone technology variant is for Capsuleers by Capsuleers, not for warclones’ leisure time. It is meant to be leased to warclone infomorph for the duration of the job. No barracks infrastructure is necessary as the NIS transfer happens right when active warclone is needed. It’s built around minimizing operational costs. This technological side-grade of yours also treats it as warclones only working for, not with, a capsuleer. Plus there are reasons why a barracks style deployment is preferable. > [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > Our approach allows for hiring a minimal warclone infomorphs population, residing in any virtuality hub, and transferring them in the blink where they are needed and where the warclone blanks are ready to receive them. With proposed warclone blanks banks network across New Eden, rapid delivery of additional warclone blanks, if needed, is possible at minimal cost. And this, herein continues to presume a lack of blank access clusterwide, and not what the current case is more accurately, that blanks are produced either from an Off-The-Shelf template an stored locally, produced on demand, or some combination thereof as befitting the needs of an operational area. > [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > By controlling the warclone blank location and activation time, the Capsuleer is in full control of the moment, location and duration of the warclone informorph entering the physical theater of operation that is the sole domain of that Capsuleer. ah here it is again, the need for complete operational control… when that level of micromanagement can and often does have deleterious effects on operational capability, and again, presumes warclones being subservient to, and not working alongside, Capsuleers or other groups. > [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > I think it’s far more efficient than an old model of keeping active, physical personel, at all times. This is what our technology proposal is aiming to replicate. ah… efficiency over efficacy. A bold strategy. One that tends to in the long term, degrade on itself. > [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > Well yes, prove me wrong. In order to operate Planetary Industry ‘legally’ **and efficiently** , you need to do it in a proper way. Otherwise you may be limited to petty smuggle if you want to bypass it. > > You may own a Planetary Customs Office, but there _may_ still be Customs Officers present aboard watching. Sure, they can be grafted handsomely but still, some SCC paperwork is necessary to clear the freight. > > By the way, is your planetary development in MHC-R3 System prepared for Deathless Circle invasion? We might be of assistance here if you run out of your warclone blanks. Point the first, as already stated, efficiency and efficacy are not the same, and I quite legitimately operate without the need for smuggling. The use of Pilot Owned Customs Offices tend to be too limited in scope for the types of work and industry that I engage in. They can be a useful tool, as are any other bit of spaceborne infrastructure. Point the second, the SCC does not control all transactions clusterwide, though there are many incentives to work with and around the SCC system. Nor are most customs offices are they staffed by SCC agents. They’re staffed by the local controlling volume’s sovereign national group. There’s a reason why in Amarr sovereign territory, for instance, you need a writ of clearance from the _Imperial Underscrivener for Commercial Affairs_ of a given planetary volume to import or export certain items in that territory, not an SCC agent. Point the third, our operations in MHC-R3 and beyond use a number of warclone cloning systems and maintenance schemas designed around maximizing efficacy, not efficiency. Not that it’s a particular concern ultimately. I’ve dealt with assaults from Serpentis and Angel Cartel in the past, and many of the warclones we work with, alongside our baseline SecOps forces, are well versed in fighting and countering warclones of all typology, including deathless Vanguard sorts. The Bosena Accords also has already released multiple open-source cloneblank formats to the public some time ago that we continue to use alongside them and others. We have significant clone fabrication facilities on site at various complexes and facilities, as well as import additional for further stockpile. Bluntly, ‘running out of warclone blanks’ will not be an issue any time soon. I’m sure your technology will find a niche, but I doubt it will see a mass adoption scenario, even with your patent and pitch to the SCC. ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [November 22, 2025, 10:42am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/100 "2025-11-22T10:42:00Z")
> [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > Said like a petulant pseudo-immortal sure of his superiority. You know, your insults are a sign of your weakness, right? If you were above my level, you would simply ignored me. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > This technological side-grade of yours also treats it as warclones only working for, not with, a capsuleer. Plus there are reasons why a barracks style deployment is preferable. No, it doesn’t assume warclones are Capsuleers’ “property”. It simply gives Capsuleers a vehicle to hire interested warclone infomorphs, for select tasks, where there is zero trust policy from the Capsuleer. And good pay. The rest of, not interested, infomorphs are obviously not included here. But are still welcomed if they change their mind. _“Pecunia non olet”_. I don’t forbid you from wasting your money and resources on tending barracks. Please, go ahead if you must. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > And this, herein continues to presume a lack of blank access clusterwide, and not what the current case is more accurately, that blanks are produced either from an Off-The-Shelf template an stored locally, produced on demand, or some combination thereof as befitting the needs of an operational area. The whole thrust behind this SCC initiative is based on a surety of an imminent Deathless Circle threat related to rogue, widespread use of their Vanguard warclone technology. The brief periods of their localized activity were just warm up. Based on our assessments, the current production lines are not portable and efficient enough, to assure rapid response clusterwide. The use of widespread network of, SCC licensed, production lines will raise the chance of preparedness tremendously. But one need to use licensed blueprints with them. Hence the SCC motion. The time for preparations is now. It is not a matter of “if” anymore, but “when”. And the answer is as soon as Q3 YC128. Don’t deny you haven’t heard of it. If you insist on denying, I assume you have ulterior reasons for derailing this initiative. > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > ah here it is again, the need for complete operational control… when that level of micromanagement can and often does have deleterious effects on operational capability, and again, presumes warclones being subservient to, and not working alongside, Capsuleers or other groups. Answered this already earlier. If you like gamble with your money, who am I to stop you? > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > ah… efficiency over efficacy. A bold strategy. One that tends to in the long term, degrade on itself. Are you saying one cant’t be efficient and effective consistently? Seriously? Or is it just about “form over matter”? > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > (…) > Bluntly, ‘running out of warclone blanks’ will not be an issue any time soon. Will you provide for the rest of the cluster by yourselves? > [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](#): > > I’m sure your technology will find a niche, but I doubt it will see a mass adoption scenario, even with your patent and pitch to the SCC. You just could had post this from the start. It would be efficient and effective. ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [January 8, 2026, 7:48pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/101 "2026-01-08T19:48:47Z")
The work on SCC application draft continues Updated **PI Costs Breakdown** graph. Updates **Practical applications of the industry, select use case scenarios** wording of second paragraph. Added new paragraph after the fourth. #### Updated SCC application draft Updates continued [here…](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/103#p-2837237-updated-scc-application-draft-1) ---
**Author:** ![Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/elinore_en_divalone/32/507815_2.png) [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Elinore_en_Divalone)\ **Post date:** [January 16, 2026, 9:57am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/102 "2026-01-16T09:57:52Z")
This message was transmitted just today: > **IMPORTANT MISSIVE FOR NEW EDEN’S VANGUARD** > YC128-01-16 > > From Lord Warden Elyan > > Warclone. > > We have returned… > > Betrayed by the Empires. Hunted by CONCORD. Purged from the Cluster. > > Too dangerous and unpredictable to be permitted freedom. > > For years, we hid in the shadows of New Eden. > > At last we have the strength to rise again. > > **Avalon is finally real. Our home among the stars, our Bastion.** > > Our actions now will shape it’s destiny > > The Empires will come for us again… > > Our fight will be eternal. > > But we will drag them down into the mud and dirt. And we will make them bleed. > > We are the immortal Vanguard. > > The Garden Watches. Attached to the transmission was this image > ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/4X/1/f/4/1f41f4b5da7dabd375f03fe9256cc6583ff66dc5.jpeg) It is related to this CONCORD report mentioned in the SCC application draft [![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/optimized/4X/5/d/f/5dfab9088ae03d5c90205febd9cdf40575e3cff7_2_477x562.jpeg) ](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/optimized/4X/5/d/f/5dfab9088ae03d5c90205febd9cdf40575e3cff7_2_477x562.jpeg) It appears The Warclones are getting even more organized and prepared for more chaos in New Eden. [Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295.md?page=4) [Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295.md?page=6)