# Formal complaint at Customs officers proceedings regarding attempted transfer of warclone blanks **URL:** \ **Category:** Intergalactic Summit\ **Tags:** pvp, planet-interaction\ **Created:** [March 24, 2023, 8:17pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295 "2023-03-24T20:17:17Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 91
**Author:** ![Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/lauralite_anne_brezia/32/380065_2.png) [@Lauralite\_Anne\_Brezia](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Lauralite_Anne_Brezia)\ **Post date:** [December 20, 2024, 6:23pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295/91 "2024-12-20T18:23:52Z")
> [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > I suppose you operate out of CONCORD controlled space and maybe you are less constrained in regards of planetary imports bypassing Skyhooks but in our case it’s different. We operate in CONCORD space and planetary imports bypassing POCOs are illegal. We could lose our planetary operations permits if we tried to circumvent those rules. We know how …but it’s still on a very small scale. Hence we need to find a legal way out of this to go bulk. I hope you understand. I’m going to touch on this in particular, ‘CONCORD Controlled Space’ is a very narrow band and constellation in the Genesis region, anywhere else CONCORD operates is _in the jurisdictional control_ of the Empires themselves. Therein, legality of what is and is not appropriate to bypass POCOs for imports is down to those jurisdictions, and in many cases, subjurisdictions such as system administrations or even planetary or planetary regional authorities. I have extensive operational experience both within and without the letter of various legal frameworks for import and export and deployment in Empire space. Much of both well documented, in particular in regard to the Systems of Eugales, Archavoinet, Lirsautton, Skarkon before its invasion and control by the Triglavian, Osmallanais and more. Just in those particular cases if we want to go with your definition of CONCORD Space, I and others affiliated with myself have yet to lose our operational licensures for operations for bypassing POCOs. Mainly because methods and manners are _jurisdictionally dictated_ and agreements with local planetary and system administrations go a long way in creating and specifying legality. In Eugales in particular, being the enforcer of a System of Interest claim by a neighbouring system memberstate, and it’s interesting status as an Unorganized/Unincorporated System gave a great deal of operational latitude. > [@Elinore\_en\_Divalone](#): > > Exactly, the point of the SCC application for _our standard_ is to “blaze the trail”, so to speak, for _all other standards_ so they could come out of the obscurity status and into the broad Market. There are already BPO _variants_ for many existing technologies. I can’t see why it shouldn’t be the same for warclone blanks. Like _Tetrimonic Warclone Blanks_ emerging recently. Or _Shriker Warclone Blanks_ found in those infamous _SCARAB Breacher Pods_. And on this, I’ll say that your presumption that these standards are in obscurity, because they’re not on Capsuleer accessible SCC Markets or parts of SCC markets, and the continuing seeming claim that it makes their use and deployments illegal, very shortsighted but very… Capsuleer all the same. This narrow lensing I think is likely the disconnect point in your rationale. There are myriad methods and options of legal and illicit engagement with various industries and non-capsuleer entities and operations beyond the SCC and CONCORD. I’d comment more on the remainder, however I have superseding business to attend to. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/formal-complaint-at-customs-officers-proceedings-regarding-attempted-transfer-of-warclone-blanks/400295)._