# Gunnery equivalents to RLML and RHML **URL:** \ **Category:** Player Features & Ideas\ **Created:** [August 2, 2020, 2:52am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/gunnery-equivalents-to-rlml-and-rhml/258051 "2020-08-02T02:52:56Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 28
**Author:** ![Archer\_en\_Tilavine](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/archer_en_tilavine/32/461718_2.png) [@Archer\_en\_Tilavine](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Archer_en_Tilavine)\ **Post date:** [August 28, 2020, 5:20am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/gunnery-equivalents-to-rlml-and-rhml/258051/28 "2020-08-28T05:20:16Z")
This post is similar to one posted some time ago: [Hello Fozzie, any update on a turret 'RHML/RLML' treatment?... :-)](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/hello-fozzie-any-update-on-a-turret-rhml-rlml-treatment/235481) The proposal was a bit different but along the same lines of reasoning. Here is what I said in response to that post: > [@Hello Fozzie, any update on a turret 'RHML/RLML' treatment?... slight\_smile](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/hello-fozzie-any-update-on-a-turret-rhml-rlml-treatment/235481/3): > > _ **the simplest solution would be to rename the modules so that they are no longer named in relation to smaller sizes** _ ; this would allow them to maintain their existing parameters with zero modifications, thereby maintaining the status quo and making it easier to modify in the future without having to do so under restraints imposed by smaller subsizes. The nice thing about the rename option is that it is not mutually exclusive with future iteration, but future iterations could be done without the restraints imposed by lower sizes. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/gunnery-equivalents-to-rlml-and-rhml/258051)._