# HAW FAX - Choose either Subcapital reps or capital reps

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/haw-fax-choose-either-subcapital-reps-or-capital-reps/117522>\
**Category:** Player Features & Ideas\
**Created:** [November 1, 2018, 6:21pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/haw-fax-choose-either-subcapital-reps-or-capital-reps/117522 "2018-11-01T18:21:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Capitol\_One](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/capitol_one/32/429562_2.png) [@Capitol\_One](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Capitol_One)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 6:21pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/haw-fax-choose-either-subcapital-reps-or-capital-reps/117522/1 "2018-11-01T18:21:57Z")

</div>

So Just like there’s 2 different weapon systems for dreads, anti-cap or anti-subcap, we should get two types of remote reps for FAX: subcapital remote reps that are effective at repping subcaps, and capital remote reps that are effective at repping caps but not so effective for repping subcaps.

It would introduce a choice with both pros and cons and hopefully make things a little more interesting instead of the current FAX that are very effective at repping anything from a frigate to titan.

What are your thoughts?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rivr\_Luzade](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/rivr_luzade/32/311061_2.png) [@Rivr\_Luzade](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Rivr_Luzade)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2018, 6:30pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/haw-fax-choose-either-subcapital-reps-or-capital-reps/117522/2 "2018-11-01T18:30:29Z")

</div>

Same sig radius based application as capital neuts for capital repair modules basically? Sounds interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Old\_Pervert](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/old_pervert/32/149708_2.png) [@Old\_Pervert](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Old_Pervert)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2018, 9:18pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/haw-fax-choose-either-subcapital-reps-or-capital-reps/117522/3 "2018-11-02T21:18:09Z")

</div>

I’ve long advocated for (and agree with you about) sig-based returns on capital reps. Would go a long way towards reducing the issues that a fax causes when one is jumped in on a subcap brawl.

And since we’re on the topic, they need diminishing returns, to prevent N+1 from working in capital brawls.

Nothing stopping you from fitting a large remote rep to your fax (I think? I’ve never tried…). A large repper would be inconsequential for repping up a cap, so there’s no real need to add “haw” reps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Curtis\_Beradan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/curtis_beradan/32/273375_2.png) [@Curtis\_Beradan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Curtis_Beradan)\
**Post date:** [November 25, 2018, 4:17pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/haw-fax-choose-either-subcapital-reps-or-capital-reps/117522/4 "2018-11-25T16:17:41Z")

</div>

Good idea. Sig radius application would bring some problems, though, since you could just target paint your own fleet members and have them turn on MWD for sig bloom to receive capital reps. I think it would just have to be hard-coded that capital reps can’t be used on subcaps.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/3X/4/1/41ec4921cbaca7a6f9ea556e7cc20018461eae5e.png) [@system](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2019, 4:17pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/haw-fax-choose-either-subcapital-reps-or-capital-reps/117522/5 "2019-02-23T16:17:48Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.