# Let’s talk about suspect flags for T4/5 **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [July 21, 2019, 9:02am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057 "2019-07-21T09:02:24Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 13
**Author:** ![Ramona\_McCandless](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ramona_mccandless/32/468438_2.png) [@Ramona\_McCandless](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ramona_McCandless)\ **Post date:** [August 3, 2019, 11:37pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057/241 "2019-08-03T23:37:41Z")
I think being able to gank them is sufficient penalty for them daring to engage in this trite content. ---
**Author:** ![Onictus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/onictus/32/277200_2.png) [@Onictus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Onictus)\ **Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 12:17am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057/242 "2019-08-04T00:17:00Z")
> [@Haulie\_Berry](#): > > Which doesn’t actually change any of the calculus on, “Highsec even with a suspect timer is still a lot safer, especially without local in null.” Not even close. ---
**Author:** ![Haulie\_Berry](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/haulie_berry/32/388021_2.png) [@Haulie\_Berry](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Haulie_Berry)\ **Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 2:47am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057/243 "2019-08-04T02:47:11Z")
> [@Janus\_Gregorian](#): > > You have to understand: Anderson isn’t interested in a proper discussion or comparable risk/reward. He just wants to protect his T5 income and will use any and all silly logic to accomplish that, or at the very least change the subject. I actually think the suspect flag would make the income a lot _better_. If you’re not a paste-eating numpty it doesn’t move the needle on the actual risk, but it intimidates the paste-eating numpties out of the market. ---
**Author:** ![Janus\_Gregorian](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/janus_gregorian/32/144827_2.png) [@Janus\_Gregorian](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Janus_Gregorian)\ **Post date:** [August 4, 2019, 2:56am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057/244 "2019-08-04T02:56:49Z")
For the people willing and capable to put in that effort, yes. But that counts out most carebears/PVers, obviously. Still, it’s one reason I’m not necessarily seeing it as the solution. ---
**Author:** ![Onictus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/onictus/32/277200_2.png) [@Onictus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Onictus)\ **Post date:** [August 5, 2019, 9:47pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057/245 "2019-08-05T21:47:49Z")
> [@Janus\_Gregorian](#): > > It doesn’t, not necessarily anyway. What matters is that right now the risk/reward for these things is out of line compared to other high sec option. Funny I can run level 4s at 200m/hr or Incursions @ 150mil/hr T4/T5s run in the that range…and being at the mercy of CCPs servers and netcode is significantly more risky than either of the above. In 3 years running incursions I have never lost a ship. Can’t say that for burners or T4s. ---
**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/3X/4/1/41ec4921cbaca7a6f9ea556e7cc20018461eae5e.png) [@system](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/system)\ **Post date:** [November 3, 2019, 9:47pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057/246 "2019-11-03T21:47:52Z")
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed. [Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/let-s-talk-about-suspect-flags-for-t4-5/177057.md?page=12)