# Mike Azariah for CSM 20 (yes, I am at it again)

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/mike-azariah-for-csm-20-yes-i-am-at-it-again/498270>\
**Category:** CSM Campaigns\
**Created:** [September 26, 2025, 11:25pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/mike-azariah-for-csm-20-yes-i-am-at-it-again/498270 "2025-09-26T23:25:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 40

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Itaer](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/itaer/32/414099_2.png) [@Itaer](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Itaer)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2025, 3:18am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/mike-azariah-for-csm-20-yes-i-am-at-it-again/498270/40 "2025-10-08T03:18:26Z")

</div>

> [@Mike\_Azariah](#):
>
> This year the brush seems to be ‘your platform was written by chat gpt.’

Let’s say that you knew for certain (somehow) that a candidate did have ChatGPT write their post. Would that make you question their candidacy?

Posts written by LLMs are pretty clear. Certainly no one would suggest that there is anything wrong with using spell check, because the function of spell check is to convey _your own ideas_ more clearly.

I think that comparing this with LLMs with a false equivalency. ChatGPT-written posts _are representing computer-generated words_ as their own original thought. Why would I want to vote for a candidate who cannot think for themselves?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/mike-azariah-for-csm-20-yes-i-am-at-it-again/498270)._