# \[NEMA Press Release\] Paid Positions for Reporters

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/nema-press-release-paid-positions-for-reporters/195779>\
**Category:** Intergalactic Summit\
**Created:** [October 15, 2019, 7:36am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/nema-press-release-paid-positions-for-reporters/195779 "2019-10-15T07:36:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 56

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maverick\_Destro](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/maverick_destro/32/167095_2.png) [@Maverick\_Destro](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Maverick_Destro)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2019, 2:28pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/nema-press-release-paid-positions-for-reporters/195779/56 "2019-10-16T14:28:02Z")

</div>

I wasn’t accusing you in particular of gatekeeping. That’s why I put in that statement about it being a generalization. I was just addressing your statement, not condemning you.

Criticism is fine, but condemnation of the material before you even give it a chance? C’mon…

> [@Diana\_Kim](#):
>
> I am requesting an independent review of activities of that Press and recommend Authorities to close them on suspicion on deals with manslaughtering cult.

> [@Teinyhr](#):
>
> I’d much rather read that than yet another CODE. wank-piece.

> [@Teinyhr](#):
>
> Maybe you’ll get more readers if you invested efforts into something more inventive.

> [@Melisma\_Ramijozana](#):
>
> Personally, I’ll read your report when it comes out, but I’ll be skipping the CODE. piece. For one because, as has been stated, it’s lame.

> [@Constantin\_Baracca](#):
>
> I’m not sure you have the ISK to pay for that award-winning writing. The rewards she won for that writing were slightly more than what you’re offering, and that was written for people she doesn’t particularly dislike… or, you know, who was at least a bit more diplomatic about it all.

> [@Teinyhr](#):
>
> Again. Trying to make an in-depth look at “how code is good for business” will be about as informational as the first thing I posted in this thread, just with so many words.

This isn’t constructive in any way. All of these comments are meant to destroy and tear down people when they try to put forth a different perspective on the cluster.

It should be noted, this is EXACTLY the type of elitist attitude of capsuleers that we plan on exposing.

I’m not here to be diplomatic. I’m not here to make friends. I’m here to ensure the cluster has ALL the viewpoints, the WHOLE TRUTH, necessary to make an INFORMED decision instead of listening to the propaganda, spin, and lies that happen here on a regular basis.

Ms. Teinyhr, you may be well-respected among the others here. I applaud that, and I’m sure you’re a pleasant individual to have a conversation with, but neither I nor my organization will be cowed by the elitists that think they get to control the narrative to their own ends.

You’re more than welcome to offer your own counter-points to anything we publish. We’d be happy to publish your responses, as well. We are the FREE PRESS, after all.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/nema-press-release-paid-positions-for-reporters/195779)._
