# Project discovery: suggestions from biologist and capsuleer **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [June 17, 2020, 6:09am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/project-discovery-suggestions-from-biologist-and-capsuleer/249609 "2020-06-17T06:09:09Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 4
**Author:** ![Dragomir\_Krividus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/dragomir_krividus/32/269154_2.png) [@Dragomir\_Krividus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Dragomir_Krividus)\ **Post date:** [June 18, 2020, 5:22pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/project-discovery-suggestions-from-biologist-and-capsuleer/249609/4 "2020-06-18T17:22:10Z")
> [@Max\_Adoudel](#): > > First of all - make more types of test samples. You feed us with all kinds of stainings (some pictures look familiar, but I won`t bet I know what is stained), which generate 1 cloud, 2, 3, 4 and so on. But you analyzed yourself just one easily distinquishable type. Those who just want profit from PD will rapidly learn that and the other samples from those high-rated ‘explorers’ will have only one small gate in the middle of nowhere. Take your time, make “test analyses” in all the clusters of images you have. This, I agree on most other points too but this one is particularly annoying. Give us more examples on how to divide more complicated samples. Also some examples are contradicting or misleading, sometimes the dividing line is placed differently on two very similar samples. Edit: From the other thread ([New Project Discovery - golden zones - #7 by Leandra\_Stormbreaker](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/new-project-discovery-golden-zones/249476/7)) it looks some characters get only limited set of examples to train on. Someone @CCP should look at that. --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/project-discovery-suggestions-from-biologist-and-capsuleer/249609)._