# Proposal for Rebalancing of the Suicide Gank

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/proposal-for-rebalancing-of-the-suicide-gank/368013>\
**Category:** Crime & Punishment\
**Tags:** high-sec\
**Created:** [June 24, 2022, 9:28am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/proposal-for-rebalancing-of-the-suicide-gank/368013 "2022-06-24T09:28:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1410

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Io\_Koval](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/io_koval/32/282426_2.png) [@Io\_Koval](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Io_Koval)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2022, 2:39pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/proposal-for-rebalancing-of-the-suicide-gank/368013/1410 "2022-09-29T14:39:57Z")

</div>

Why do you bother replying to a guy desperate for a forum post from CCP:

> [@Lucas\_Kell](#):
>
> Ask him though. @CCP_Rattati, in the following slide, when you labelled some highsec PvP as griefing, were you only talking about behaviour that is currently against the EULA, or were you talking about a subset of highsec PvP that is currently allowed within the EULA?

Yet IGNORES the POST-FANFEST _forum post_ BY CCP, which should exactly be what he wants:

> [@GM's holding strangers accountable for toxic behavior](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/gms-holding-strangers-accountable-for-toxic-behavior/371089/27):
>
> To be abundantly clear: there has been no policy change for ganking

> [@GM's holding strangers accountable for toxic behavior](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/gms-holding-strangers-accountable-for-toxic-behavior/371089/27):
>
> Asymmetric PvP, as well as ganking, is still allowed in EVE.

This OBJECTIVE FACT has been pointed out to him before. It’s not worth engaging anymore.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/proposal-for-rebalancing-of-the-suicide-gank/368013)._