# Suggestion: Sisters of EVE Expeditionary Command Destroyer

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/suggestion-sisters-of-eve-expeditionary-command-destroyer/518646>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [September 21, 2026, 3:41am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/suggestion-sisters-of-eve-expeditionary-command-destroyer/518646 "2026-09-21T03:41:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ViviCruor-2](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/vivicruor-2/32/510320_2.png) [@ViviCruor-2](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/ViviCruor-2)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2026, 3:41am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/suggestion-sisters-of-eve-expeditionary-command-destroyer/518646/1 "2026-09-21T03:41:44Z")

</div>

\*\*Suggestion: Sisters of EVE Expeditionary Command Destroyer\*\*

- \*\*Covert Ops cloaking\*\* — warp while cloaked, for scouting or repositioning undetected

- \*\*Scan strength/probe bonus\*\* — reinforces SOE’s exploration identity, faster/better scanning for wormholes and exploration sites

- \*\*Command Burst bonus\*\* — at least one Burst type (Skirmish or Information fits the covert-support role) to buff a small cloaky gang from within cloak

- \*\*Expedition Hold\*\* — a modest expedition-fit cargo bay, so it can double as a light exploration/support hull on the move

- \*\*Price target: 100–200M ISK\*\* — accessible support-hull pricing, not T3-tier

Fills the gap for a covert-capable command hull with Sisters flavor — mobile buff support that also pulls its weight scanning/exploring, instead of choosing between a Force Recon and a plain Command Destroyer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Asgidur\_Hurtini](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/asgidur_hurtini/32/494282_2.png) [@Asgidur\_Hurtini](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Asgidur_Hurtini)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2026, 4:29pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/suggestion-sisters-of-eve-expeditionary-command-destroyer/518646/2 "2026-09-21T16:29:26Z")

</div>

Ofc posting on the right section is a challenge.

Who sends a destroyer as an expeditionary ship anyway?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Namdor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/namdor/32/396179_2.png) [@Namdor](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Namdor)\
**Post date:** [September 21, 2026, 5:19pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/suggestion-sisters-of-eve-expeditionary-command-destroyer/518646/3 "2026-09-21T17:19:45Z")

</div>

> [@ViviCruor-2](#):
>
> Fills the gap for a covert-capable command hull with Sisters flavor

What gap?

There not being a ship for that doesn’t mean it’s a gap.

You’re obviously not getting a covert ops + MJFG + booster at that price tier. You might see that in an AT prize ship, maybe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lucy\_Alfrir](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/lucy_alfrir/32/382506_2.png) [@Lucy\_Alfrir](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Lucy_Alfrir)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2026, 11:06am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/suggestion-sisters-of-eve-expeditionary-command-destroyer/518646/4 "2026-09-22T11:06:57Z")

</div>

Came to say Cloaky command dessy sounds OP, but @Namdor beat me to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mitsu\_Miu](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/mitsu_miu/32/414469_2.png) [@Mitsu\_Miu](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Mitsu_Miu)\
**Post date:** [September 22, 2026, 12:01pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/suggestion-sisters-of-eve-expeditionary-command-destroyer/518646/5 "2026-09-22T12:01:13Z")

</div>

Would need a wee bit of nerfs, thus

Links for only remote and local reps. Booshes only logistics ships.