# Talking in Stations Podcast, open mic, Name & shame FC's **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [December 1, 2020, 10:31am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/talking-in-stations-podcast-open-mic-name-shame-fcs/283031 "2020-12-01T10:31:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 11
**Author:** ![Archer\_en\_Tilavine](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/archer_en_tilavine/32/461718_2.png) [@Archer\_en\_Tilavine](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Archer_en_Tilavine)\ **Post date:** [December 1, 2020, 2:41pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/talking-in-stations-podcast-open-mic-name-shame-fcs/283031/11 "2020-12-01T14:41:35Z")
Once again, you don’t like someone, therefore you say their credibility/qualifications are zero. Classic Brewlar, incapable of saying “while I disagree with/don’t like this individual, I cannot deny their credibility/qualifications”. Speaking of zero qualifications/credentials, in [your single-issue CSM campaign](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/brewlar-kuvakei-bringing-an-end-to-botting-game-moderator-corruption/238549) your proposals were repeatedly debunked by those who were actually knowledgeable about/experienced in IT security/computer programming, but you insisted on pitching defective-by-design/wouldn’t-work-at-all anti-botting measures anyway. And who the ■■■■ accuses constituents who disagree with them to be “pro-botters” anyway? What is that? So childish. By the way, you know “Name & Shame FC’s” is literally part of this thread title, right? Thought I’d let everyone know in case you decide to edit title and whitewash history. Pathetic. ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/3X/2/e/2e968b56eee75efe69d1e3ce0a3fafcfb0cb758e.png) --- _[View the full topic](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/talking-in-stations-podcast-open-mic-name-shame-fcs/283031)._