# The new status of Intaki

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469>\
**Category:** Intergalactic Summit\
**Created:** [November 8, 2022, 11:20am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469 "2022-11-08T11:20:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 7:58pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/21 "2022-11-08T19:58:19Z")

</div>

Did they fix the broken station yet

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Arrendis](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/arrendis/32/432594_2.png) [@Arrendis](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Arrendis)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 8:07pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/22 "2022-11-08T20:07:49Z")

</div>

Declared it a monument, I think.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 8:08pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/23 "2022-11-08T20:08:35Z")

</div>

How tragically on brand.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Imrik\_Schereau](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/imrik_schereau/32/343151_2.png) [@Imrik\_Schereau](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Imrik_Schereau)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 9:06pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/24 "2022-11-08T21:06:29Z")

</div>

> [@Kitaula\_Kuusa\_Jouhinen](#):
>
> Oh look, the Federation stomping their bloody boots all over another people’s right to self governance. So nice of them to decide what kind of freedoms other people are allowed to have. So long as it doesn’t inconvenience The People too long, right?

It has always been the way of the Intaki to observe and avoid snap judgments and rash actions. Letting the ‘dust settle’ and negotiations conclude to see where things land is preferable.

Personally, I think the Federation securing Intaki and Placid against the ongoing, never-ending turmoil that has plagued the region is a step in the right direction. Perhaps not the best method but time will tell if it was for good or ill.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diana\_Kim](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/diana_kim/32/382972_2.png) [@Diana\_Kim](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Diana_Kim)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 9:42pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/25 "2022-11-08T21:42:54Z")

</div>

Negotiation implies you can trust other party’s words. After Federation has been repeatedly violating treaties it was signing, making a new treaty with them is unwise. You could expect even from Gurista more honor than from Federal swines.

This is not a time for talk. This is a time for fight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bataav](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/bataav/32/502151_2.png) [@Bataav](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Bataav)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 10:14pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/26 "2022-11-08T22:14:24Z")

</div>

> [@Andreus\_Ixiris](#):
>
> I’m not party to exactly how the situation has changed

You’ve been gone too long Andreus.

The Federation has demonstrated on multiple occasions that it is happy to simply ignore the inconvenient when it suits them, even if that means actively preventing the Intaki Assembly from legally awarding critical contracts under the franchise system, or disregarding core agreements that establish the very nature of Federal membership for Intaki and the surrounding systems.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 10:18pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/27 "2022-11-08T22:18:52Z")

</div>

> [@Bataav](#):
>
> even if that means actively preventing the Intaki Assembly from legally awarding critical contracts under the franchise system

Do you have proof of this allegation?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ulysses\_Redmane](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/ulysses_redmane/32/410129_2.png) [@Ulysses\_Redmane](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Ulysses_Redmane)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 10:24pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/28 "2022-11-08T22:24:15Z")

</div>

> [@Ilyan\_Valtovist](#):
>
> We’re again at a point where a very few people keeping a cool head is all that’s between us and a considerable amount of death and chaos, and I can’t help but resent the latest link in the chain of escalation for it.

And all of this in a time of terrible disaster and uncertainty. The Trigs are up to something, the Drifters are lurking just out of sight, and every Empire is at eachothers’ throats. What’s next? Sansha? Overminds?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bataav](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/bataav/32/502151_2.png) [@Bataav](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Bataav)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 10:53pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/29 "2022-11-08T22:53:31Z")

</div>

Of course.

The Intaki Assembly first met with representatives from the Intaki Space Police in [November YC121](https://universe.eveonline.com/new-eden-news/concord-and-empires-mount-major-operations-against-triglavian-stellar-manipulation-capsuleers-fighting-on-all-sides).

Since then, the Gallente Federation have delayed the entire process, using the weight of Federal beauracracy at every stage, with Senate committees and panels being involved where they are not required. What little progress the Federation has allowed, has been reported on by The Scope over the years.

The Intaki Assembly [successfully asserted its sovereignty under the Federal constitution](https://universe.eveonline.com/new-eden-news/flosewin-iv-occupation-and-inner-circle-peace-summit-dominate-new-year-yc122) in YC122, and under the franchise system, it is the Intaki Assembly that has authority, not the Senate.

The Senate may disapprove of the Assembly’s choice of franchisee, but that does not equate to the right to block a legitimate process.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 10:55pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/30 "2022-11-08T22:55:18Z")

</div>

Ctrl+F “Franchise”

No matches

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bataav](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/bataav/32/502151_2.png) [@Bataav](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Bataav)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:04pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/31 "2022-11-08T23:04:21Z")

</div>

I recommend the [ISP for Intaki](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/isp-for-intaki/287403) discussion.

Alternatively, if you’re looking at The Scope, unfortunately they have a habit of relegating Intaki news to the footnotes, but the minor headlines are there should you with to look for them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:11pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/32 "2022-11-08T23:11:59Z")

</div>

If I were an uncharitable person, I would suggest you’re extrapolating a situation that would be conducive to your agenda from headline stubs.

My level of charity is contingent upon my previous experience with an organisation.

I will - in a fashion that ILF shall no doubt enjoy - leave it as an exercise to the reader to draw their own conclusions on the implication here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/auriga_menkalinan/32/351666_2.png) [@Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Auriga_Menkalinan)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:20pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/33 "2022-11-08T23:20:02Z")

</div>

> [@Andreus\_Ixiris](#):
>
> My level of charity is contingent upon my previous experience with an organisation.

How is your level of charity with [published decisions of the Supreme Court](https://universe.eveonline.com/new-eden-news/galactic-hour-news-roundup-caldari-protests-privy-council-and-triglavian-occupation), in this case overruling the Federal Security Council’s stay on franchise negotiations?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:22pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/34 "2022-11-08T23:22:03Z")

</div>

Curious that you didn’t lead with that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/auriga_menkalinan/32/351666_2.png) [@Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Auriga_Menkalinan)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:22pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/35 "2022-11-08T23:22:55Z")

</div>

I’ve not said a word today. Let’s see how this pans out first.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:27pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/36 "2022-11-08T23:27:25Z")

</div>

Even so, your best argument here is “the Intaki franchising process was subject to a stay pending review by the Federal Security Council due to the understandably contentious nature of who the Assembly was proposing to choose, a thing that the Federal Security Council may have theoretically been entitled to do, but the Supreme Court reasserted that the Assembly has rights accorded to it under its Federal charters.”

That’s government bureaucracy in the Federation working as usual, and it is - and I must stress that it feels _insane_ that I need to point this out to you - _Intaki’s sovereign rights as a Federal signatory being upheld_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/auriga_menkalinan/32/351666_2.png) [@Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Auriga_Menkalinan)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:34pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/37 "2022-11-08T23:34:05Z")

</div>

I agree with you both, actually, which leaves me in a quandary. While I welcome the removal of Viriette from the scope of the War Powers Act, I share Bataav’s misgivings about the intentions of the federal authorities for what comes next. I don’t think that’s particularly unreasonable, given all the ‘bureaucracy’ involved. We shall see.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Andreus\_Ixiris](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/andreus_ixiris/32/498273_2.png) [@Andreus\_Ixiris](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Andreus_Ixiris)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:35pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/38 "2022-11-08T23:35:30Z")

</div>

Right, because the Federation always has to be in the wrong here _somehow_, doesn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/auriga_menkalinan/32/351666_2.png) [@Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Auriga_Menkalinan)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:37pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/39 "2022-11-08T23:37:07Z")

</div>

> [@Andreus\_Ixiris](#):
>
> I must stress that it feels _insane_ that I need to point this out to you

You don’t need to. I publicly thanked the court at the time. I was really heartened to see that part of the system working but that was 18 months ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/auriga_menkalinan/32/351666_2.png) [@Auriga\_Menkalinan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Auriga_Menkalinan)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2022, 11:38pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469/40 "2022-11-08T23:38:43Z")

</div>

No it doesn’t. You seem to be the one making assumptions about my views here.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/the-new-status-of-intaki/383469.md?page=3)
