# TIL EANMs are better than active Hardeners

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/til-eanms-are-better-than-active-hardeners/57474>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [February 15, 2018, 5:18pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/til-eanms-are-better-than-active-hardeners/57474 "2018-02-15T17:18:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![S\_totan](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/s_totan/32/161406_2.png) [@S\_totan](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/S_totan)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 5:18pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/til-eanms-are-better-than-active-hardeners/57474/1 "2018-02-15T17:18:57Z")

</div>

As the Title says,  
2 dark blood EANMS and 2 dark blood ANMs will give you a better resistance profile than 4 damage specific ACTIVE hardeners.  
On a Redeemer, the resistance profile is 85,75,73,72 with the passive hardeners, but 85,75,72,72 with the active hardeners.  
So, use no cap and have a slightly better tank than an active tank approach.  
The active tank approach does have the ability to overheat though which give it better tank overall but at the cost of burning mods and use of CAP… so I dont know what to think here.  
Should active tanking modules(un-heated) be better than passive tanking modules?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Makshima\_Shogo](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/makshima_shogo/32/247769_2.png) [@Makshima\_Shogo](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Makshima_Shogo)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 7:09pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/til-eanms-are-better-than-active-hardeners/57474/2 "2018-02-15T19:09:25Z")

</div>

Its for situations where you need only 1 or 2 resistances high and have low amount of slots for it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Abyss\_Azizora](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/abyss_azizora/32/15938_2.png) [@Abyss\_Azizora](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Abyss_Azizora)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2018, 7:35pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/til-eanms-are-better-than-active-hardeners/57474/3 "2018-02-15T19:35:27Z")

</div>

Doing anything where you know the damage types (usually only 2 of the 4) is where active hardeners shine. (Also you can overheat them.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system1](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/original/3X/4/1/41ec4921cbaca7a6f9ea556e7cc20018461eae5e.png) [@system1](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/system1)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2018, 7:49pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/til-eanms-are-better-than-active-hardeners/57474/5 "2018-05-16T19:49:36Z")

</div>

Closed on May 16, 2018, 7:49pm UTC

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
