# Triglavian T3C – Revisiting an Old Idea

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155>\
**Category:** Player Features & Ideas\
**Tags:** feature-request, ships\
**Created:** [October 13, 2026, 10:00am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155 "2026-10-13T10:00:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drosera\_Binata](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/drosera_binata/32/514743_2.png) [@Drosera\_Binata](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Drosera_Binata)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2026, 10:35pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155/21 "2026-10-13T22:35:06Z")

</div>

hey, i think a standup vorton projector could be fun

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Levedi](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/levedi/32/514716_2.png) [@Levedi](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Levedi)\
**Post date:** [October 15, 2026, 8:15am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155/22 "2026-10-15T08:15:36Z")

</div>

Here’s something I’m curious about:

For those of you who already fly Strategic Cruisers, would you actually consider switching to a Triglavian T3C if one became available?

Not necessarily because it would be stronger, but simply because of the different playstyle and Triglavian identity.

I’d be interested to hear what would make it appealing to you. o7

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drosera\_Binata](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/drosera_binata/32/514743_2.png) [@Drosera\_Binata](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Drosera_Binata)\
**Post date:** [October 15, 2026, 2:48pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155/23 "2026-10-15T14:48:22Z")

</div>

even though i cant, i probably would

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gerard\_Amatin](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gerard_amatin/32/481361_2.png) [@Gerard\_Amatin](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gerard_Amatin)\
**Post date:** [October 16, 2026, 8:49am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155/24 "2026-10-16T08:49:32Z")

</div>

> [@Levedi](#):
>
> For those of you who already fly Strategic Cruisers, would you actually consider switching to a Triglavian T3C if one became available?

Depends on the use-case.

I often pick a T3C based on what I want to do with it. Tengu does nice sniping in PvP, Loki has long range webs, Proteus can be fun with sentries, smartbombs and I’m lately using it for exploration, Legion had the right profile for some event sites when I ran those. Legion logi does well dropping with Redeemers while Loki logi does well in a shield setup with HAM web Lokis, Tengu is nice if you wish to bring ECM while Proteus can bring long range scram and point almost equal to an Arazu.

So I’d probably look at what kind of thing I can use the Trig T3C well for.

As the first covert ship with spooling damage I bet these T3Cs will quickly find a new place in the whaling meta where Kikis and Bombers already do well by combining both the spool and the cloak.

It would be more mobile than a bunch of blops, and on a bulkier cruiser hull more capable of skirmishing than bombers or destroyers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 11:58pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155/25 "2026-10-17T23:58:37Z")

</div>

Hear me out.

For EWAR. Give them smartbombs that Neutralise. Since the existing ships have bonus to smarts and neuts.  
Low or no damage 10-15km range AOE neuts.

Also have only 3 subsystems instead of 4 because TRI haha.  
Offensive

1. Desintegrator
2. Aoe Smartbombs
3. Spooling Armor repairer+command  
Defensive
4. Covert
5. Passive
6. Active  
Propulsion
7. Agility+Warp speed
8. Ab+Mwd bonus
9. Interdictor nullifier  
And no engineering or whatever is the 4. today and jsut adjust slots and stats to compensate for the lack of a 4. subsystem.

Ps: Also let them fit assault damage control and siege and probably a panik modules as well or 2 that needs a wormhole to lock on to.

Ps2: Also give them MJD field generator that jumpos backwards instead of forwards. Or jumps 3 times because TRI haha…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Syzygium](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/syzygium/32/510263_2.png) [@Syzygium](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Syzygium)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2026, 12:08am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155/26 "2026-10-18T00:08:20Z")

</div>

> [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](#):
>
> For EWAR. Give them smartbombs that Neutralise. Since the existing ships have bonus to smarts and neuts.  
> Low or no damage 10-15km range AOE neuts.

That is a very dangerous approach. Especially when combined with a hull that can be cloaky and can warp nullified.  
The range of this AoE effect has to be pretty small to prevent Headshot-Moves against whole fleets when used in large numbers. And this could mean the system would be pretty useless if used solo or in small numbers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/cpt_whiteeye/32/473463_2.png) [@Cpt\_WhiteEye](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Cpt_WhiteEye)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2026, 12:11am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155/27 "2026-10-18T00:11:41Z")

</div>

I dont think we are talking about usefulness here. If that were the case then CCP would have to revisit every T3C we currently have and think hard about half the subsystems usefulness.

Just give it some stupid op think liek the rest ofthe triglavian ships and its fine. The game will balance itself around it. Also if someone manages to neutralsie a whole fleet with cloaky T3C Triglavian Cruisers and then manage to kill that fleet with another fleet then its all the best. At least iwill have something to watch on youtube.

Ps: hell yeah imma ask siri to make a video of that rightnow and heat up Texas a bit. Winter is coming.

Ps2: Knowing CCP the next ship they gon release will be a Serpentis Logi ship with a shotgun remote rapairer out of nowhere because theyh ave no pattern and randomly release stuff when the AI is done with it. Just look at the Akoman. We get it its harvest season. But that thing was not designed by a human.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/triglavian-t3c-revisiting-an-old-idea/520155.md?page=1)
