# Wondering how many "mega multis" will be heading to Exordium to avoid ganks

**URL:** <https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [April 15, 2026, 4:26pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972 "2026-04-15T16:26:13Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Remi\_Lacroix](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/remi_lacroix/32/494680_2.png) [@Remi\_Lacroix](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Remi_Lacroix)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 12:02am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/183 "2026-05-03T00:02:47Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> > [@Darquies\_Shade](#):
> >
> > and now a whole new player system that will not allow ganking at all
> > 
> > And I do believe the new system will be chock full of all kinds of players
> > 
> > Just not gankers 🙂
> 
> Maybe you can exercise even harder ganks in Exordium than outside of it…not against the ships and pod, but against the whole account. I was told you call it “to barney someone” by popular folks here…
> 
> So if you find anyone above 4 weeks old grinding away in Exordium, you might want to drop a message and a screenshot to CCP, so that they either enforce it how they say they would or they implement mechanics to prevent it in the first place or they clarify their rule set for the new region.

wowie. Barney fife trying to set up his own police department!

Imagine that.

You’re like that shade guy. Nothing is clear enough for you. CCP has been very clear, and its just not enough for you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Power\_Armor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/power_armor/32/413178_2.png) [@Power\_Armor](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Power_Armor)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 12:48am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/184 "2026-05-03T00:48:12Z")

</div>

The official rules haven’t been published yet. Only intentions. I couldn’t find it in the EULA or elsewhere just yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gloria\_Exercitus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/gloria_exercitus/32/509735_2.png) [@Gloria\_Exercitus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Gloria_Exercitus)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 1:25am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/185 "2026-05-03T01:25:18Z")

</div>

> [@Eloken\_Toralen](#):
>
> Ganking is heading down the same path. Of course, CCP does not want to ban it outright straight away, its going to be a slow frog boil.

CCP will ultimately find that the way to keep noobs is to make the game _more_ dangerous…not less so. It would be better to provide noobs with more opportunity to replace lost ships, than to prevent them losing them.

Fact is, CCPs own stats have shown that only 1% of noobs get ganked in the first 2 weeks. The vast majority who leave are _not_ leaving because they got ganked. I suspect they leave because they are bored. And ironically the lack of danger is _part_ of that boredom.

So CCPs attempts to ‘fix’ a non-existent ganking problem will only make things worse…like doctors of old who applied leeches to ‘heal’ a patient and then wondered why they died.

CCP need to do the counter-intuitive thing and _increase_ the danger. Give noobs more starter ISK…more easy ways of replacing ships, and so on. But ‘safe’ areas…no, that’s not a fix, that’s the end of EVE.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Remi\_Lacroix](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/remi_lacroix/32/494680_2.png) [@Remi\_Lacroix](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Remi_Lacroix)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 1:49am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/186 "2026-05-03T01:49:54Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> The official rules haven’t been published yet. Only intentions. I couldn’t find it in the EULA or elsewhere just yet.

So you’re intentionally ignoring everything that has been posted by ccp about something that isnt live yet?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Christine\_Creed](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/christine_creed/32/510186_2.png) [@Christine\_Creed](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Christine_Creed)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 3:30am UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/187 "2026-05-03T03:30:04Z")

</div>

> [@Remi\_Lacroix](#):
>
> So you’re intentionally ignoring everything that has been posted by ccp about something that isnt live yet?

Yep, thats exactly what Barney is doing. I bet he kicks his own puppies and kittens over it as well.

🤡 Praise Barney Fife of Exordium 🤡

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Power\_Armor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/power_armor/32/413178_2.png) [@Power\_Armor](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Power_Armor)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 1:22pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/188 "2026-05-03T13:22:31Z")

</div>

Just as you say it…while it isn’t published and in effect and only announced in the forums, it isn’t in effect as it isn’t published and only announced in the forums and thereby no applicable rule for the not opened yet space yet and so won’t be enforced and can’t be adapted to by the players because the exact wording is unknown yet, because it is unpublished and not in effect, neither in the EULA nor in the rulesets accompanying the EULA on the mighty webpage of rulesets where also the EULA is published.

And all of these announcements and intentions are subject to change until they are finally fixed and published. From that point on, everyone can read them and adapt their playstyle accordingly.

I hope i have made myself clear enough.

Otherwise please get back to me and i will take my time to elaborate further.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darquies\_Shade](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/darquies_shade/32/410887_2.png) [@Darquies\_Shade](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Darquies_Shade)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 4:43pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/189 "2026-05-03T16:43:02Z")

</div>

> [@Darquies\_Shade](#):
>
> But i really Really get tired of all the vitriol that comes from these forums.

> [@Remi\_Lacroix](#):
>
> get real. you spent multiple days trying to deny the reality of eve online then decided to attack my real life and now you’re tired of the vitriol? You cause it with your child antics and refusal to accept any information that does not match your own wild opinions.
> 
> A couple of people on these forums like to point, call names, make wild assumptions and then play victim.

> [@Remi\_Lacroix](#):
>
> wowie. Barney fife trying to set up his own police department!
> 
> Imagine that.
> 
> You’re like that shade guy. Nothing is clear enough for you. CCP has been very clear, and its just not enough for you.

> [@Christine\_Creed](#):
>
> Yep, thats exactly what Barney is doing. I bet he kicks his own puppies and kittens over it as well.
> 
> 🤡 Praise Barney Fife of Exordium 🤡

I rest my case

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sonder\_Majus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/sonder_majus/32/495253_2.png) [@Sonder\_Majus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Sonder_Majus)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:08pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/190 "2026-05-03T19:08:34Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> no applicable rule for the not opened yet space yet and **so won’t be enforced**

Where did you get that from?

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> because it is unpublished and not in effect

In effect over what? Unreleased, non-existing content?

Man, this gloom and doom over a _non-issue_ is really tiring. It is as if you’re depressed, over being unemployed, because it is Sunday. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Power\_Armor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/power_armor/32/413178_2.png) [@Power\_Armor](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Power_Armor)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:16pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/191 "2026-05-03T19:16:45Z")

</div>

Could you please read more thoroughly before posting?

I really don’t know how a non released rule for a non-opened space could be enforced in a non-opened space? You tell me how it is possible?

From my educational knowledge i can only enforce rules once i published them and the thing that is governed by these rules is in existence or in this case “opened”? A question of sequential timing, right? Cause and effect?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:27pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/192 "2026-05-03T19:27:39Z")

</div>

What even is your point? The content isn’t released, they said they will be updating the TOS/EULA. This is something you would complain about only IF the content is released and they enforce rules that aren’t published yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sonder\_Majus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/sonder_majus/32/495253_2.png) [@Sonder\_Majus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Sonder_Majus)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:36pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/193 "2026-05-03T19:36:41Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> I really don’t know how a non released rule for a non-opened space could be enforced in a non-opened space? You tell me how it is possible?

Well, the question is fallacious. Why would you even expect to police something, which doesn’t even exist?

Your whole issue is circular reasoning. You’re using a conclusion \<rules don’t exist yet\> to “prove” your premise \<rules won’t be enforced\>. Again, just a logical fallacy.

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> From my educational knowledge i can only enforce rules once i published them and the thing that is governed by these rules is in existence

Correct. Since the EULA has to gover the game _as it is now_, only applicable rules are published and enforced.

So, why are you creating false dilemmas here?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Power\_Armor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/power_armor/32/413178_2.png) [@Power\_Armor](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Power_Armor)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:36pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/194 "2026-05-03T19:36:58Z")

</div>

I don’t have a point right now. I keep telling that the rules haven’t been released and finalized and that the space isn’t open, while other people tell be rules have been published in the forums and thus are already law and in effect.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sonder\_Majus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/sonder_majus/32/495253_2.png) [@Sonder\_Majus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Sonder_Majus)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:38pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/195 "2026-05-03T19:38:10Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> other people tell be rules have been published in the forums and thus are already law and in effect.

Where? Everyone is talking about intentions and goals shared by CCP. You’re the one hell-bent on rules for non-existing issue. It is just that everyone is tired of your contrarian doom and gloom comments.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Power\_Armor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/power_armor/32/413178_2.png) [@Power\_Armor](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Power_Armor)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:40pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/196 "2026-05-03T19:40:31Z")

</div>

I have written a dozen times that the rules are not written down and in effect and thus not finalized. Just read above.

Yet Remi Lacroix says, i would be ignoring everything and acting against all that is published.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malak\_Starfire](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/malak_starfire/32/501915_2.png) [@Malak\_Starfire](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Malak_Starfire)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:43pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/197 "2026-05-03T19:43:49Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> I don’t have a point right now.

Then stop? You’re the one making a big deal of things. I have not seen others state that things are already in effect…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Power\_Armor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/power_armor/32/413178_2.png) [@Power\_Armor](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Power_Armor)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 7:52pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/198 "2026-05-03T19:52:33Z")

</div>

My actual last topic was - and there clearly was a “maybe” included…and it was an answer to Darquies Shade and then they jumped on me how i could even dare to ignore the written and established rules of Exordium:

> [@](#):
>
> > [@Darquies\_Shade](#):
> >
> > and now a whole new player system that will not allow ganking at all
> > 
> > And I do believe the new system will be chock full of all kinds of players
> > 
> > Just not gankers 🙂
> 
> Maybe you can exercise even harder ganks in Exordium than outside of it…not against the ships and pod, but against the whole account. I was told you call it “to barney someone” by popular folks here…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sonder\_Majus](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/sonder_majus/32/495253_2.png) [@Sonder\_Majus](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Sonder_Majus)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 8:12pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/199 "2026-05-03T20:12:48Z")

</div>

Buddy, just drop it. 😃

Nobody here wants to spend mental energy on decyphering what was your “actual last topic” or whatever else you’re going to come up with. Don’t cherrypick the issue, you post a lot of comments and often refuse to elaborate further.

Just wait until rules do get published, instead of flopping around with absurd statements and made up problems.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Glenduil](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/glenduil/32/501812_2.png) [@Glenduil](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Glenduil)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 8:59pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/200 "2026-05-03T20:59:47Z")

</div>

Remi is wrong. No rules have been set. The space doesn’t exist. It’s all just fantasy at this point. There is no newbie safe space.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Remi\_Lacroix](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/remi_lacroix/32/494680_2.png) [@Remi\_Lacroix](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Remi_Lacroix)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 9:06pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/201 "2026-05-03T21:06:58Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> Just as you say it…while it isn’t published and in effect and only announced in the forums, it isn’t in effect as it isn’t published and only announced in the forums and thereby no applicable rule for the not opened yet space yet and so won’t be enforced and can’t be adapted to by the players because the exact wording is unknown yet, because it is unpublished and not in effect, neither in the EULA nor in the rulesets accompanying the EULA on the mighty webpage of rulesets where also the EULA is published.

How is something to be enforced when the space isnt even reachable? What is there to enforce? Nobody is there.

Rules and eula/tos changes will likely come when the content goes live. CCP through various developers and gm’s have expressed their plans and are up front about veteran players not being able to farm the content.

You’re just being ridiculous, like that shade guy. Over and over and over you have to be shown the posts by developers. You might quiet down for a short time, but then its back to the same ridiculous why why why why what if what if what if, i’m going to report everyone, i’m going to report everyone.

It’s nonsense. It’s child antics on a forum with no purpose other than to feed into the very same reason ccp gave for making the safe space for new players. Misinformation and hypotheticals and “I’m just asking questions” when you already know the answer.

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> And all of these announcements and intentions are subject to change until they are finally fixed and published. From that point on, everyone can read them and adapt their playstyle accordingly.

You can read what they have published. You are playing coy and I do not understand the reason behind it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Remi\_Lacroix](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/eveonline/user_avatar/forums.eveonline.com/remi_lacroix/32/494680_2.png) [@Remi\_Lacroix](https://forums.eveonline.com/u/Remi_Lacroix)\
**Post date:** [May 3, 2026, 9:14pm UTC](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972/203 "2026-05-03T21:14:05Z")

</div>

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> I don’t have a point right now. I keep telling that the rules haven’t been released and finalized and that the space isn’t open, while other people tell be rules have been published in the forums

> [@Power\_Armor](#):
>
> thus are already law and in effect.

Your conclusion if flawed.

First; CCP has a whole page announcing reasoning, mechanics, features and some indicators of coming rules, and reasons behind them.

Then there are posts on the forums from ccp developers that further elaborate.

Not one person you’ve argued with on this thread has said the rules are already in place.

[Previous page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972.md?page=9)

[Next page](https://forums.eveonline.com/t/wondering-how-many-mega-multis-will-be-heading-to-exordium-to-avoid-ganks/509972.md?page=11)
