The Righteous do the Right thing when No One, not even God, is Looking.
Which is exactly why the issues highlighted during the invasions of YC122 and alluded to by this latest leak need to be addressed. Or do you suggest that we should maintain the status quo that utterly failed the State, all while demanding further funding? The Corporate Security Forces outperformed EDENCOM in State systems, consistently. Would it be unreasonable to think that maybe further association with EDENCOM, it its current incarnation, would be detrimental to our defense?
You say that as if it is something admirable.
The continued loss of life and materiel alike is horrifying.
It is imperative that we reconsider our stance, hopefully seeking out a peaceful resolution to this conflict. I do not know about you, but I am not terribly fond of throwing loyal men and women into a meatgrinder without any attainable strategic objectives in mind.
As mentioned ad nauseum, EDENCOM failed us. Our own Corporate forces were better. EDENCOM, as it is now, should be torn down. Either restructure it into an actually effective organization, one led by a level-headed and impartial officer, or do away with the entire concept and use the funding to reinforce national defenses.
The CONCORD entity that takes your advice on defense policy deserves its fate, Malitia-hnolku.
What âfailed usâ was the capsuleer class. Your traitorous self very much included. Had we stood together, nothing need have been lost.
To. Your. Masters.
Traitor.
I advise you refrain from speaking on subjects you know so little about, all for the sake of hollow antagonization. It reflects poorly upon both yourself and your associates.
The issues with EDENCOM run deep and need to be addressed. A well organized defense would not fall from the minor contributions of a handful of capsule pilots. The outcomes of the invasions speak for themselves, especially those of systems where independent capsuleers did not participate.
Except, of course, that the âEDENCOMâ forces in the State were Caldari Navy forces, organized according to Caldari Navy doctrines and run by Caldari Navy officers.
So did EDENCOM fail the State, or did the State fail EDENCOM?
Well obviously, Amicia Cora, circumstances are not static. If they were, why would policies need to change in the first place?
I think what youâre missing, maybe, is that you think the goal of Midularâs government, and by extension that of mine, was peace.
Ah yes, well known Caldari Navy doctrines such as Raptors fit with dual light pulse lasers, and an utter lack of any hybrid weapons systems.
There is a reason the Megacorporations are blaming EDENCOM and there is a reason that our Honorable Chairman, who personally fought against the Triglavians, saw fit to instruct our Inner Circle delegation to vote for reducing EDENCOMâs funding once already.
Not so well known, perhaps, but all of the vessels assigned to EDENCOM were from the various navies, and EDENCOM doesnât appear to have refit anyone elseâs ships. Nor did they really have the time to refit every one of hundreds of ships assigned to them by the Caldari Navy.
Which means the State, which is well-known for not trusting outsiders and not wanting to show their best toys to outsiders, didnât send their front-line assets to EDENCOM, but probably garrison or even training vessels, second- or third-line, likely long-obsolete doctrines, staffed by people the megas wouldnât miss.
But Iâm sure youâll argue that it makes more sense to believe that an Amarr-biased EDENCOM singled out the Stateâthe Empireâs allyâfor a level of malicious, active sabotage they didnât display toward any of the other powers, including the Republic, expending time and effort, manpower, money, and materiel, all to undermine their own efforts, than that an insular, xenophobic State withheld their most capable and effective assets for themselves, and only committed lesser, more expendable forces to the command of foreigners.
Yeah, itâs called âCYAâ: Cover Your Ass. Any politician who can get into a position of authority knows that the very first thing they should do when any crisis goes badly⌠is find someone to blame. And the second is âblame them, loudlyâ.
This is why there should be a mandatory uniform for politicians of assless chaps.
That way, itâs obvious to even the most casual observer, whether the politician is doing anything constructive, or merely covering their ass.
Also means that if a voter is unhappy with their elected representatives, they can use an implement such as a rug beater, and give them a damn good thrashing.
Thank you for your kind and thoughtful reply, Amicia. You know that my own skepticism is not rooted in the ancient Empire, only in specific elements. Certainly not in the noble paragons of Khimi Harar whose comradeship I treasure.
It is mainly directed at the tyrants of the Federation, who would only use political unity as a tool to puppet us. It is a game they play extremely well. It would be a union that could only leave the State sliding back into subjugation, mob rule and degeneracy after a hundred years of war and the blood of generations spent to preserve our way of life.
There is also a point to be made that the differences between the Empire and Republic are far too serious to be resolved by a mere mingling, and that to call for unity before these fundamental differences are resolved is to âmake the jump before the callâ.
My use of the past tense in reference to EDENCOM was deliberate, though I am aware of some continuing efforts. If EDENCOM wishes to justify the present tense, it needs a victory. To justify the future tense, it will need a plan.
If it wants to continue receiving its remaining support, it should also address these concerns openly and honestly. There must be a full investigation into this scandal.
I would add this to my platform, darling, but the Federation seems to have already moved beyond assless chaps to chapless chaps, if you know what I mean.
Yes, I concede it is difficult for me to take âI heard from Jimmy that, according to Billy, Judy said the Amarr are meanie poopoo headsâ seriously. Really now, Judy. What gave the religious fanatic slaver empire away?
StillâŚ
Given that the police function of CONCORD clearly must be devolved to respective national security agencies, it does follow that EDENCOM should also be devolved.
You just described the Amarr Empire.
Regarding EDENCOM, Now that the Invasions are currently over, EDENCOME and Edencom aligned organizations should transfer control and ownership of all established infrastructure to the Empire in which that Infrastructure exists, and EDENCOM itself should be disbanded.
To my knowledge there is no tube child programme in place to replace Caldari Navy Crews with Arrendis clones.
Fortunately, the recent labor demonstrations show that the State has an abundance of citizens the megacorporate executives would be just as happy to see dead.
I think, perhaps, the point raised is more that viewing Collective as some form of Outside Context Problem existential threat doesnât really work, in that similar scenarios have played out, over and over and over again in human history, and downplaying that they have by raising that international norms for that didnât exist previously, particularly to those affected by it quite viscerally, is probably not particularly wise
Note, mind, that this is not a justification of the Invasions, but more me trying to highlight something you may have, perhaps unintentionally, overlooked considering the anagonistic relationship you have with those like Mr. Aloga.
And, unfortunately, I am under no illusions that, should my own people have been within easy reach of the Empire, they would be the target of a violent attempt at reclamation and subjugation, and in fact many amarr I have spoken to have confirmed this outright, being outside the normal diplomatic realm of the CONCORD treaties my people are not openly recognized as protected by those international agreements. And the only reason they have not been put to that particular torch, has been due to the resources to do so being better put elsewhere, and ultimately(to our great benefit), limited range of projected power.
No, itâs not. Itâs assumption, denial, and demanding. Faith insists things must be the way you want them, no matter the evidence, no matter what suffering that justifiesâbillions must be enslaved, abused (physically, emotionally, and sexually), have their very identities stripped away and all knowledge of their ancestors ripped from them, for generation after generation? Why, thatâd be terrible if we did it to you, but when you do it, itâs ok because God said so.
Thatâs âfaithâ. That kind of myopic, âok for me but not for theeâ self-centeredness is the end result of all faith. Because faith denies evidence, and demands acceptance.
Hope, trust, and conviction are wonderful things. Hope is aspirational, where faith is compliant. Trust built on evidence, on knowledge, is one of the strongest bonds there is. And conviction⌠conviction is just the willingness to act on that trust, to be steadfast and worthy of it in return.
None of those things require âfaithâ. Faith is simply the narcotic those in power keep you hooked on, to ensure you will be their biddable tool. Thereâs a reason so many faiths revolve around ideas like your âParadiseâ, why so many depend on there being a reward at the end of this life. Because faith itself is a corruption of those things you claim it encompasses, and so it encourages corruption, it encourages transactional virtue.
âIâll be good so I get the rewardâ is not virtue. It is avarice. It is being paid off. It is grift.
And it is what you cite in the exhortation of âfaithâ you call your âPaladinâs Codeâ.
Except that a mutually agreed-upon international order realized through those agreements did exist among the people being invaded. To say that the Empire does not fill the role of the Triglavians, you would have to establish that the Triglavians, at the time of invasion, were already part of CONCORD, and violated those agreements.
You believe wrong. All of your replies have downplayed centuries of murder, assault, rape, and torment into something acceptable, even laudable. Your empireâs proponents are no different from the Kybers in their âno, look, itâs really all for your own goodâ rhetoric.
You have no right to those words.
This conversation is over.
Slightly off topic, does not faith also mean trust?
Could one have faith in their ability? Would a trooper, who has faith in their leaders ability to lead well, also be considered under the influence of a narcotic?
Faith is belief in the absence or defiance of evidence. Itâs sometimes used to mean trust, but when that trust is grounded in evidence, itâs just that: trust, not faith. In the example of a trooper who places faith in their leaders⌠if thereâs no evidence to suggest that their leaders are competent⌠then yes, the âyou must be good, or you wouldnât be in chargeâ is very much an artificial additive being used to numb pain, worry, and anxietyâa narcotic.
Ah, so if I were to say thar you have a lot of faith in the logical process, it would really mean trust. But to someone who doesnât know much about that or an outsider, it could look like faith?
I donât know much about the Amarrian God, but I would say that they have books and scriptures that teach them the way and they trust that, and the evidence in those and thus looks like faith.
Where as my faith is Wayism, is really faith because there isnât a set of accords or teachings.