I would like to submit this petition to request the development team to reconsider the current design of the AEGIS Capital Ship Security Facility sites. The structure of these sites makes them exceedingly difficult to complete. Over the past two weeks, I have attempted to run them three times using a specialized ship fit; however, the density of the mines in the second room is overwhelmingly high, making progress nearly impossible.
I propose reducing the mine spawn density by at least 10% to improve playability. While I fully support the intended challenge of these sites, their current state appears unmanageable. In my experience, these sites are rarely completed, as most signatures remain untouched until they naturally despawn.
Additionally, it is noteworthy that the primary loot from these sites is also obtainable from covert research facilities—sites that are highly risky yet still feasible. This issue has persisted in the game for at least two years, as I encountered the same challenges before taking a break.
Please rest assured that my feedback is not based on a single attempt. I have tested multiple ship fits and strategies while carefully studying available resources, including YouTube guides.
Btw there are far more difficult sites out there with imbalanced(in a bad way) difficulty/reward ratio like Ancient city(step 4), Drifter hive sites and AEGIS Secure Capital Construction Forges. The subject here is childs play compared to those.
Regarding the first message, I can’t share any location with you. Looks like you dismiss my feedback without bringing up anything substantial. Perhaps you’d like to share some specific data or recordings how to run the site.
Your second message is not relevant to the subject that I raised. Please open a separate thread if you have feedback regarding these sites. I will analyze it and perhaps voice my opinion, too.
Indeed I dismissed it. You clearly havent invested enough time to research info about site on the internet/practice the site otherwise you wouldnt post that wall of text here. And why should I spoon feed you or anybody here? So site loot would cost less and the the guys who actually did their homework would have more competition? Nah
Again, assumptions. You don’t ask, you assume. This is quite arrogant and short-sighted. I did invest enough time and even my killboard reflects it. Unlike you, I believe I run enough of these sites to make an opinion.
PS. TR09N please provide the video recording of you running the site successfully.
TR09N you haven’t provided any meaningful feedback here. Just an assertion that it’s fine for reasons you refuse to substantiate. Dismissing it out of hand is a waste of a post.
Anyone could respond as you had on any subject, regardless of whether they knew anything about it. While I’m sure you’re not an idiot the problem we have is that your post is completely indistinguishable from something that an idiot would write. How are we to know that you’re right?
The assertion was that the site difficulty doesn’t match the site reward, especially when the same reward is available from a much easier site. The evidence offered was that people are cherrypicking sites and that this site is not being picked because it’s not worth running. And that when he tried running them with a specialized fit the mine density made them more trouble than it was worth. His proposal was matching the difficulty to the reward by reducing the difficulty so that they become a part of the game that people don’t intentionally steer away from.
To counter this you’ve provided a simple negation “you’re wrong”.
When asked to provide arguments you provided a wallet screenshot.
You’re meant to be arguing that the reward is appropriate for the difficulty. That means arguing that either OP has overstated the difficulty or understated the reward. I think you’re very confused about what is going on here because you’re struggling to match the content of your posts to the subject of the discussion. Please try harder to address the assertion made in your disagreement with it.
Evidence of its worth running? Evidence that I competent enough to say that OP havent invested enough time to find optimal way that doesnt care of mine density? Also comparing this sites is incorrect, covert sites have less spawn rate than aegis one, like you can find 2-3 coverts per region max and 5-6 aegis ones. By the time you could find one covert I can complete 2-3 aegis ones.
