Once I started reading, my first thought was…
What a great sight! Our IGS needs such a tower.
Though then it went through ideal into creepy and inefficient angle:
For how would you optimize the law if you can’t criticize it?..
But when it went worse. The lawspeaker was clearly insane - setting laws for objects without will. Or he was simply utterly incompetent. Unmerited. Unprofitable.
How did he was even put in this position? How did they choose the successor? Was it some sort of democracy, that allowed such stupidity to happen?..
Yet I think the moral of the story and answer of the question - what’s the one true law, should be this:
If you set the rules, you must follow them yourself.