Uedama anti-gank

I rode atop a beetle and killed people with a pitchfork. Killing them in the most ridiculous fashion XD

Ive not bothered to mine. I dont have time for that so i sell plex.

Looking at all that, it looks like the miners have to be extremely sweaty whilst mining, all while peeps can just warp in and kill them, and having to fit a relatively expensive ship.

Seems a bit sht but i guess they should have escorts. People in my corp do protect miners if needed and recently one defended himself with drones and a buddy.

1 Like

If you mine in an out of the way system, youā€™re fine. Basically most mining fleets do not engage in opsec at all, thus get blapped.

Iā€™d forgotten what this thread was about, Githany. There are just so many of them dealing with what you call (rather dramatically) a ā€˜scourgeā€™.

I went back to the top to read your original post again, and Iā€™m glad I did, for there I noticed the words Iā€™ve quoted, above.

You want to help stop ganking in Highsec. I donā€™t think Iā€™ve ever seen you write your aim quite so starkly.

Not even Dracvlad (and Co.) have said they wish to go that far.

Unless I have misunderstood you, of course.

You see, seen in that light, your efforts will be ineffective - unless you have the backing of the gameā€™s designers. Is there more to your organisation than white-knights and woolly-wishes? Concerned gamers want to know!

1 Like

I do not believe mining or ganking were part of the original idea of eve, We can be what ever we want to be but in the same respect , Iā€™m not going to say statements like happened in the last war" We want Goons removed from the game " when I heard that I thought , well that plans doomed, we will never remove ganking but once people couldnā€™t fight them because of various factors. Now we have changed the face of ganking forever and inflict substantial losses.

Our movement will continue and more will fall, remember gankers are just the tip of the iceberg

1 Like

The Tip of which Iceberg, Githany? Which other playstyles would you like to banish from the game? Worth a couple more threads?!

She wants to eliminate lowsec pvp as well, but she doesnā€™t really mean it, sheā€™s just a ltitle high and drunk and roleplaying as someone who plays EVE.

1 Like

was this the iceberg that sank the titanic, is ag a modern version of the titanic.

2 Likes

You know I donā€™t , just want to stop the bully boy tactics where ever they be.

Ps how was dune

Ahh another Dune fan? And Aiko is a Dune fan as well? People of culture I see. Iā€™m hopefully watching it tonight. I still think the perfect Baron Harkonenn was the guy from the Sci-Fi mini series.

You canā€™t and wonā€™t. While CCP may or may not have originally intended for hi-sec ganking, itā€™s pretty clear that they whole-heartedly embrace it now. Ganking helps fight inflation - both you and the ganker(s) lose your ships and ~50% of your mods. Ganker may profit, but overall it removes wealth from economy. So trying to fight against ā€œbully boy tacticsā€ is fighting against CCP itself. And youā€™re not gonna win that fight.

And no, Iā€™m not a ganker alt. I actually fking despise ganking. Mostly cuz Iā€™m jealous of them getting a free pass while CCP fkd over can-flipping and one-man wardecs. But also cuz itā€™s a crappy game mechanic completely stacked in favor of the aggressor. Iā€™d like to think there are better ways to mitigate inflation, but this is CCP weā€™re talking aboutā€¦ so weā€™re stuck with ganking. (Until all the victims decide to win EvE, but by then it will be too late.)

Very good.

Thatā€™s why I will not give up , with enough of us we can change anything, look how ganking has changedl

1 Like

im curious how has ganking changed ? in your opinion,

in every patch/nerf ganking has had to change . ganking is an evolving process, back in the day it was a few folk in a niche profession. as valid forms of highsec naughtiness was removed/ nerfed one by one more folk were funnelled into ganking as options decreased.

over time the gankers also got nerfed and we had to get better and tighter to overcome the nerf ( and we did ) , then we were nerfed again and we got tighter and nerfed again . ganking has been in a constant flux of change for as long as i remember but we just come back harder every time we get nerfed, and so many nerfs lol its not funny anymore.

ganking is always changing to the conditions of the game and the choice of prey so whats new. thats EVE

3 Likes

Are you trolling me? Or are you really that delusional? Itā€™s hard to tell.

Other than insurance, how has ganking ever been nerfed?

i am guessing you have not ganked over the last 15 years.

1 Like

Using local is only practical when thereā€™s less than 20 or so people. Once it gets beyond that, the window has to be made too large to see everyone on it, and by the time you get to 30 - 40 people the natural variation makes it much harder to spot groups of 5 or so ( which Iā€™ve seen on Zkillboard kill off a Procurer ) turning up.

But heckā€¦that doesnā€™t go with the ā€˜simpleā€™ narrative does it.

1 Like

I have not. But I am aware of the changes that have been made. But those changes (insurance, hp boosts, hull resists, sec status hits, etc) have never stopped ganking. If anything, ganking has only increased over the years. So itā€™s hard to take the idea of it having been nerfed seriously. Yeah more people have been funneled into ganking which definitely contributes to prevalence. But when folks are ganking targets for fun, without even bothering to scan their fit/cargo, and still coming out ahead in the long run, you know the changes havenā€™t been effective.

2 Likes

As Vladimir says above, ganking is ridiculously stacked in favour of the aggressor. Gix wants to believe the myth that people who get ganked are naive, stupid, not alert, etc, etcā€¦but even a cursory look at zkillboard shows that people arenā€™t getting ganked for want of shielding. And whilst being alert may eliminate 99% of ganksā€¦the victim only has to make a mistake once. The odds are always stacked in favour of the ganker.

And they must always be, by definition, as in PvP it must always be possible to overcome armour, shielding, etc otherwise there would be invincible ships and PvP would become meaningless.

2 Likes

My problem with ganking is people calling it PvP. Piracy is of course part of Eve, but 23 Catalysts shooting up a largely defenceless Procurer that cannot fire back should be called just piracy. Calling ganking PvP is like calling the mugging of some little old lady a ā€˜street fightā€™.

2 Likes