Really?
So what kind a size does a system have to be before a Null Alliance cannot provide cover/runs out of players/alts?
Bearing in mind a ship has a D-Scan Range of 14.3 AU, so 8 ships would have a sensor footprint (taking into account overlap) of around 1700+ square AU
Tell me.
Why are people logging out of the game and unsubscribing if what you say is true?
Not everyone is goon scum with botting alts.
Whether what I say is true or not does not have anything to do with you guessing the reason for the Black Out and calling it true.
Where is your evidence of reduced cap production?
Do you have some data about any Null operations with the big blocs at all?
The people who are lying about leaving are the renters and krabulons.
Do keep up R2.
This is called “deflection”. Its a sad attempt at validating your position.
No one is talking about production, you toad.
Yes, its called “tears of null bears” and you can locate it on the platform we are talking on right now.
Ok, so what i said is true. Got it.
Hey guys,
I’m not sure why you’re arguing like this on the thread. I’m looking for constructive ideas and thoughts from people to see if others want Null sec population to increase and what they think the game needs in order to see that happen.
Lets do a hard reset here and start over with idea’s to increase Null sec Population from people who want more pilots in null sec.
My position has been from the start that you are making up reasons for black out and calling them true. Now you are asked to provide proof and are in fact deflecting onto whether nullsec empires know how to use DScan.
Better a toad than an outright liar.
How does removing non aligned krabs stop the donut?
Delete Dscan, imo.
Usage of alts predominately is for increase income, no defense. Very few people utilize alts in this manner. Thus, only goon scum does this (give a few).
Interestingly, your both, and more.
Im tired of your stupidity, go talk to someone else. You only reply to my posts to get attention, and im denying you that. Maybe you’ll cry some more about it.
At least you admit youre biased.
If that’s what you have to answer a simple question, you should be glad someone gives you the time of day.
Yes, I am. And your point?
More demonstration of your inferior intelligence levels.
Everyone is biest, though i would not expect you to understand more intellectually inclined things like that.
You are precious.
I release you for now.
Oh Small one. Don’t worry, you might grow up some day and maybe then you will get not smart…but…smarter
STILL waitin’ tah hear about that thing he’s been developin’.
@Wardeth_Power super cap production is not important for the health EVE.
You should tell that to you goon leaders.
It is you are or you’re FFS!
He actually edited a quote of mine in a mistaken attempt to correct my punctuation-less but otherwise accurate “youre” to “your”. Incorrectly.
that’s not a war. not in the actual sense of the word
local is easy intel. the amount of time i spent in null it was
x person is in y system, ship unknown
ive been forced to dock up or be yelled at, get fined, or get kicked out over neuts being 15 jumps away up a pipe
Yeah, and that Im not disputing.
A large alliance being unable to work around it for the same outcome was what I was disputing.
This is true, and its a highly important point. The conditions of war mechanics really need to be reinvestigated. To base it on the single most important accomplishment (building your own station(s)) a corporation or alliance could make is a bad way to kill the communicable effort and sense of progression.
This is a really big issue and mistake on ccp’s part.
The only effective way at working around this is to contract alliance space into a more favorable manner, and camp that entry point. This will give alliances and their rivals targeted area’s of engagements. They wont have to look for fights, they will know where they are.