you need to read at first … he dont want to swap ! he wanna fit both at the same time …
then use a zeugma ?
to hack bot data and relic. Which is what data and relic modules are used for, may I teach you.
and why should he used it ? its price is about 100 times higher then 2 modules fittet ! and as he can fit bith modules there is no need for … you need to teach yourself first before you want to teach others
The T2 modules are not only significantly less expensive then the zeugma, they are better then the zeugma at doing the hacking, too: t2s allow storing 3 utitly modules instead of the zeugma’s one, and the t2’s virus resitance is higher, too.
The zeugma is only better when you cannot or do not want to fit 2 modules, e.g. when fitting a T3C to run the more dangerous hacking sites, such as the later rooms of the superiour sleeper cache or a higher end wormhole hacking sites… or when fitting a pvp-prioratized astero and the scram complains it feels lonely without the company of a web, but the astero needs a prop mod, too, so… one mid is all that’s left for hacking…
Indeed.
I was answering literally to his literal interpretation of the OP. In most cases you can have one analyzer fit and the other one can be refit with a depot. Your fit can hack both data and relic, though it does not have the two installed at the same time. This information is still relevant as it implies the rigs should not be data- or relic-specific.
removed several posts.
1. Specifically restricted conduct.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to courteous when disagreeing with others.
In order to maintain an environment where everyone is welcome and discussion flows freely, certain types of conduct are prohibited on the EVE Online forums. These are:
- Trolling
- Flaming
- Ranting
- Personal Attacks
- Harassment
- Doxxing
- Racism & Discrimination
- Hate Speech
- Sexism
- Spamming
- Bumping
- Off-Topic Posting
- Pyramid Quoting
- Rumor Mongering
- New Player Bashing
- Impersonation
- Advertising
3. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online if it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.
I was fitting one up and that’s the point where it ran out of powergrid - with just that stuff on it. I was demonstrating that it is hobbled in terms of fitting.
With a power core in a low slot, it’s far less slippery in null with a slower align time than the cheetah and Helios.
there was some advice that you should fit a 300+ million isk module wich can hack data AND relic sites !
For travel between cans in large, spread-out sites. Doubling the price of the killmail is irrelevant to me. I don’t lose hacking ships. I am still flying my original helios from many years ago.
My original post is about how in the game balance is created by giving each racial ship a sort of role that makes one choose what to do. However, for exploration in a covops ship, there really aren’t multiple options that excuse racial differences between ships. Every ship needs:
- To have a fast align
- cloak
- Nullifier
- MWD to get between cans quickly
- hacking modules
- probe launcher and probes
- cargo scanner
Unfortunately, the Helios is the best at doing this without having to sacrifice one of the options. It can do it all without fitting modules or low slots.
Cheetah seems to do ok with a power core in one low slot. and has the same align time.
Anathema is incapable of fast align like the Helios.
Buzzard can’t do it all.
I’d prefer to fly a buzzard. I like the way the ship looks. But…
what ?`oO
which ship you want to fly … you gave 2 different answeres … oO
you contradict yourself and thats the reason i cant believe you that you dont lose any ships …
and as you said :
i know you loose ships ! because MWD bewteen the cans are the dumbest choice of travaling from can to can
What about dropping a BM when you load grid, to bounce on it ?
Anyhow I still like the MWD to move on small distances.
Data + Relic rigs
Data Analyzer + Relic Analyzer + 5MN MWD + Cargo Scanner
Sub 3s align
Nullifier, Sisters Launcher, Covert Cloak
Whats there to complain about the Anathema? You are slower in movement but have plenty of fitting room for other shenanigans. If you don’t need that, fine, but it delivers everything you ordered.
5 Likes
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.