If he did he wouldn’t be asking for HAC buffs. 
3 Likes
Realllyyyy? I mean ralllyy?
Aside from the higher hp and resists across the board?? Aside from the 2 other bonus categories???
Would you be happy if they just put it all under ‘Bonuses’?
You would be complaining no matter what. If it had 2 ‘role bonuses’ you’d be crying for 3.
Cerberus:
Caldari Cruiser bonuses (per skill level):
5% bonus to kinetic Light Missile, Heavy Missile and Heavy Assault Missile damage
10% bonus to Light Missile, Heavy Missile and Heavy Assault Missile max velocity
Heavy Assault Cruisers bonuses (per skill level):
10% bonus to Light Missile, Heavy Missile and Heavy Assault Missile max flight time
5% bonus to Rapid Light Missile, Heavy Missile and Heavy Assault Missile Launcher rate of fire
Role Bonus:
• Can fit Assault Damage Controls
But yes, it’s ROLE affords it that ability… since ADCs can literally ONLY be fit to them.
1 Like
adc can also be fitted on assault frigates
Yes. Because the role of the HAC/AFs is to be in the thick of combat. To be the heavy assault and withstand heavy assaults for a limited amount of time.
HACs are fine. This a lame attempt at a reverse nerf thread. The OP thinks HACs are OP, so generates a silly thread.
Pretty sure the role of AF is just too grab tackle long enough for something heavier to show up.
Well that too. Thats where the ADC comes in, to hold out long enough. Pretty sure the OP is just gas lighting HACs.
The op is just a troll who ever so often creates new idiotic threads about nonsense, and people keep falling for it.
lol lol
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.