It looks like you’re as lazy with your reading comprehension as you are with your ‘creativity’ and your work ethic. I didn’t dismiss your idea because an AI was involved. I didn’t even dismiss it. I gave it a very weak ‘Sounds interesting’ and then pointed out that both your presentation and the concept were flawed. It had nothing to do with AI - it was because of things like pulling “Cloud-Optimized Warfare for smooth and scalable fleet engagements” out of thin air, or using meaningles puff-phrases like “What you conquer you must defend”.
Used properly, it might be able to. “Please flesh out my two-sentence concept with a bunch of buzzwords so it looks better”… isn’t that use.
Yes, it is inherently bad. I already pointed that out. If you could get the AI to explain things for you, you might’ve noticed. It’s bad because people invest their game time in EVE to build their ‘presence’ in EVE. Their wealth, their corp, their territory. Creating a pocket dimension is absolutely useless for that, and thus would be ignored by all but a very bored few. On their alts.
Compelling gameplay absolutely needs to occur in existing space. Creating a separate mini-game effectively outside of EVE is just a cop-out for an actual lack of creativity. EVE has tons of underused existing space. While new space is an option, it should be used to enhance and expand activities in existing space, not replace it with a one-way exit.
Yeah, it really is. You used AI to blow a 2-sentence concept with few actual details into a vague and meaningless babble filled with hype and jargon. The problem isn’t that you ‘used AI’. The problem is that it’s advertising style hype effectively divorced from the reality of the game.
Sure, it’s great to have an idea for adding something cool to the game. It’s nice to take the time to post it so other people can react if they choose to. For that, you got a mild thumbs-up.
The idea got the criticism because it has massive gaping holes and pie-in-the-sky wishful thinking. Your presentation (“hire me and I’ll do this”) got criticisms because it was clear you’d put no real effort into it, and CCP already has a bunch of guys talking up their cool new ideas while putting too little effort into actually implementing them.
And the AI usage got criticism, not because you used AI, but because you used it to skip past all the actual meaningful thought that might have turned the idea into something interesting, and just crank out a puffy description that looked good but meant little.
If you’re looking to get hired mate, then show you’ve got something more on the ball than "My work skills are ‘typing things into chatgpt’, and ‘advanced copy paste’ ".
